The Resistance (Game Over)

pablito · Post Post #26 (isolation #1) » Wed Nov 25, 2015 7:25 pm

I've never played resistance before, but it seems that long deadlines and long discussion phases will help us. So if mission #1 is only 3 people, then I think it could be helpful to put some names into consideration that we would like to keep in the limelight for later, right?

P-edit - yes, I agree with BNLProof

pablito · Post Post #54 (isolation #2) » Thu Nov 26, 2015 3:41 pm

In post 48, lilith2013 wrote:

Is there ever a situation where someone would want to reject a team in the beginning rounds?

(Sorry for rambliness, blame the thanksgiving wine.)

We do get more information through the leader's team suggestions than the missions themselves so rejecting more often than not could give us more information for later, no?

pablito · Post Post #89 (isolation #3) » Sat Nov 28, 2015 1:28 pm

@Lilith, do you feel more comfortable nominating 3 or 4?

pablito · Post Post #91 (isolation #4) » Sat Nov 28, 2015 1:37 pm

Well if bbmolla's team is confirmed/approved you'd have to nominate a team of 4.

pablito · Post Post #103 (isolation #5) » Mon Nov 30, 2015 8:54 pm

No surprise that the first mission went through. It doesn't give us much information - anything specific to the first mission will just incite some WIFOM. What I would like to see is bbmolla's and BNL's suggestion for what they would like to see lilith to do. That will get us information.

pablito · Post Post #150 (isolation #6) » Fri Dec 04, 2015 3:40 am

Wait what. why are we doing Jal again?

pablito · Post Post #175 (isolation #7) » Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:30 pm

@Bowser and Talah, how do you feel about Jal?

pablito · Post Post #181 (isolation #8) » Tue Dec 08, 2015 3:40 am

I'm cool with bnl choosing whom he wants and us figuring out by our votes. When we give leaders carte Blanche to choose the team (even by pre-deciding in a benign manner), we lose an essential game function that is offered to us. I'll use my vote to show my hand and am willing to explain after ward.

I think right now our biggest info is in the last vote and it should be used accordingly.

pablito · Post Post #205 (isolation #9) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 1:41 pm

BNL was pretty straight forward during D1. The remaining days have been pretty flippity-floppity.

In post 96, BNL wrote:Well I guess we're sending the same team again, but we need to townhunt in the remaining 7 people.

This doesn't scream confidence despite pushing that plan D1. Furthermore has been continuing to push the plan D3 despite providing some hesitance on bbmolla. Makes me feel like the original plan that was pushed forward pretty confidently (send the first 3) has been the scum winning strategy and BNL may be pushing the fail onto JAL and may do so to fluminator later.

Those are my thoughts at least - didn't feel helpful for me to say that all before bnl was figuring out who he wanted to send.

Yes there are 5 attempts per mission. We can allow to fail some. A common role PM for vanilla says "You have no power other than your vote." We have been given the opportunity to vote here. Still not sure why not everyone is giving so many approval votes.

So yes, if BNL had sent me instead of bbmolla, I would still consider rejecting it.

pablito · Post Post #227 (isolation #10) » Tue Dec 15, 2015 5:41 pm

fwtjr - this is the first time you've been been selected. So I'm wondering about your thoughts on Jal?

pablito · Post Post #238 (isolation #11) » Sat Dec 19, 2015 7:10 am

SC - rejecting if bb or jal
bowser - rejecting bb
bb - rejecting if sc
bnl - rejecting sc or jal
talah - rejecting jal

I was rejecting bnl, but I'm not so sure about bnl anymore.

The default should be to reject right now since we cannot miss one more. at least we have more clearance in this one.

I think jal is a clear "should reject", but I'm starting to wonder if bb might be a scapegoat for the scum - this aligns with my current gut that at least one of sc or bowser are scum

pablito · Post Post #244 (isolation #12) » Sat Dec 19, 2015 12:15 pm

@BBmolla, what are your thoughts on talah accepting the team for mission 2?

pablito · Post Post #258 (isolation #13) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:09 am

talah, Jal already said not proposing a Jal-less team, so who are you directing your message to really?

BNL, you blatantly are skipping over jelly, which tells me you think that scum must be bowser, sc, fwtjr, jal - please explain why you think it is exactly those four.

pablito · Post Post #259 (isolation #14) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:10 am

*whom

pablito · Post Post #281 (isolation #15) » Sun Dec 27, 2015 6:22 pm

My biggest question mark is on bowser, so I'd rather have bowser off the team. I'm real good with the first three that jelly mentioned as being on the team.

pablito · Post Post #299 (isolation #16) » Fri Jan 01, 2016 4:48 pm

I'm not going to ask for much consensus before I propose any team. I'm going to listen some and maybe ask questions of others and make my own team. Feel free to suggest people though, because it helps me figure out who I'm going to send.

I have some solid two-three I'm planning on sending with me.

pablito · Post Post #315 (isolation #17) » Sun Jan 03, 2016 12:54 pm

I'll submit a team sometime tomorrow. I'm for sure sending lilith and myself.

pablito · Post Post #317 (isolation #18) » Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:00 pm

Nominate: BBmolla, lilith2013, BNL, pablito, Fluminator

I feel most confident in this team.