[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7541747 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Secret Hitler (Voting) - Mafiascum.net
Jelly had no choice but to enact a fascist policy.
Unfortunately a liberal can't always enact a liberal policy, especially if
there aren't any liberal cards in the hand they get
. Which is what happened. As confirmed by drench.
And you still haven't explained your vote. You can't explain an event using a second event that happened after the first event. That doesn't even make any sense.
I already suspected this person of being a fascist but this post displays a remarkable lack of paranoia
Post
Post #250 (isolation #2) » Tue Jan 19, 2016 2:33 pm
Postby Cephrir »
In post 177, Drench wrote:i am leaning towards investigating lilith right now, mostly because since three fascist policies have been drawn, it's pretty likely there's gonna be at least one liberal one next time around. knowing if the president and thereby the president's veto power is liberal or not is therefore important. that's what i want to do. 8f 6l means more than likely there's gonna be one liberal card; 3f is only a 15% chance. we need a liberal president to avoid that one liberal card getting nixed before anyone else knows about it
you're not lilith and frankly your constant begging from day one despite repeatedly being told you're not getting what you want is definitely something that i've had to read
p-edit: step away from the computer. maybe breathe a bit
Post
Post #275 (isolation #12) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:38 pm
Postby Cephrir »
In post 273, MrTrow wrote:Yes, i seemed to have totally ignored 'if lilith is scum, then so is drench' when i pointed out cephrir stated the exact same thing, to later claim never having seen the investigation-result that made it so.
Post
Post #276 (isolation #13) » Wed Jan 20, 2016 2:39 pm
Postby Cephrir »
In post 274, lilith2013 wrote:That doesn't make much sense either. 11/17 * 10/16 * 9/15 = somewhere around 25% chance of getting 3 fascist policies. Whereas there's a 11/17 * 10/16 * 6/15 = about 15% chance of getting 2 fascist cards and one liberal card. By jelly's info we confirm that there were at least 2 fascist cards so it's actually more likely that Drench had 3 fascist policies than 2 fascist and 1 liberal.
Post
Post #280 (isolation #14) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:03 pm
Postby Cephrir »
In post 278, MrTrow wrote:No this math is not correct.
That is the chance Drench drew 2 fascist cards and THEN a liberal one.
If we take 'the liberal card could have been the first or the second' into consideration, we're talking about 45%
And then there is the 24% chance of 2 fascist cards in the draw (also implicating Jelly)
Post
Post #293 (isolation #18) » Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:44 am
Postby Cephrir »
In post 291, MrTrow wrote:I had reasons to assume that government would install a fascist policy, i was proven right: any 'ja'-voter ready to backup their, now proven to be anti-town, vote?
Post
Post #325 (isolation #23) » Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:47 am
Postby Cephrir »
In post 322, MrTrow wrote:Let me return with the second most ignored question in this game thusfar: any 'Ja' voters who would like to provide a motivation?
weren't you the one who defended a nein vote with the astounding defense of "they enacted a facist policy therefore i am right"
or is someone else not the brightest bulb in the room
He's way too vocal and seemingly useless to be scum?
let me introduce you to blackberry.
what I mean is BB repeatedly directed attention at himself with "investigate me" and ll that shit. I doubt any Fascist would do that, and I can definitely see a liberal doing that
i would be surprised if blackberry didn't do something off the wall like this as any alignment
Post
Post #337 (isolation #26) » Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:29 am
Postby Cephrir »
In post 331, MrTrow wrote:Your insistence that those who are perfectly fine with giving up their task of trying to stop the fascists, should NOT be questioned, has been noted.(again)
Post
Post #346 (isolation #27) » Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:49 pm
Postby Cephrir »
I think that Trow is probably town I just really don't care enough to pay attention to what he's trying to say and he's unbelievably bad at being concise.
The only thing you don't like about me is that I keep calling you a fascist.
That's not hypocritical. You can quickly read my posts and tell what the point of them is.
Post
Post #369 (isolation #29) » Thu Jan 28, 2016 2:35 am
Postby Cephrir »
In post 366, MrTrow wrote:Though, that's nothing compared to Ceph: who
- refuses to read
- refuses to have reads
- doesn't want readable stuff to exist
- considers, just wait and let the fascists win, the default approach to this game
- is fine with creating (even more) apathy, in this game
what's truly impressive is that not one of these posts says or does what you represent it as saying or doing
Post
Post #370 (isolation #30) » Thu Jan 28, 2016 2:35 am
Postby Cephrir »
In post 366, MrTrow wrote:There is a distinct difference between:
- 'pushing for activity on P1, because then we'll have some workable content by p8'
and
- 'pushing for activity on P1, while firmly of the belief nothing before 'arbitrary game event X' can ever matter and actively hindering situation 1, by pointing this out on P4'
shos did the latter.
Post
Post #371 (isolation #31) » Thu Jan 28, 2016 2:37 am
Postby Cephrir »
the reasons i'm not really posting are
a) i'm having difficulty caring
b) I don't think we're going to accomplish much of anything until we get a nomination here
In post 366, MrTrow wrote:There is a distinct difference between:
- 'pushing for activity on P1, because then we'll have some workable content by p8'
and
- 'pushing for activity on P1, while firmly of the belief nothing before 'arbitrary game event X' can ever matter and actively hindering situation 1, by pointing this out on P4'
shos did the latter.
you could really stand to get over this.
"oops my buddy scumslipped can you please stop telling everyone and maybe forgive him??"
Post
Post #379 (isolation #34) » Thu Jan 28, 2016 12:04 pm
Postby Cephrir »
You really like writing words don't you
In post 378, MrTrow wrote:Sorry, i thought: " I mostly don't read them", means you mostly don't read them(posts, that is)
No, just yours, because they are long, convoluted and boring
Now we're on the subject of posts like 'a JA vote doesn't need defending' (it IS the default, one needs a very good reason to provide 'usefull vote data')
When I said it was the default I was not referring to the game mechanic, I feel that you should vote for it unless you have a good reason not to
this isn't mafia and i don't want to spend two weeks running in circles with no information over reads someone got on page 1
Post
Post #381 (isolation #36) » Thu Jan 28, 2016 12:07 pm
Postby Cephrir »
In post 378, MrTrow wrote:Interesting comparison.
I remember that one, (had forgotten you were in it though)
I replaced in late D1, correctly pinned your slot as scum D2, later you replaced in, insisted early-tells were bullshit, read only half of posts and got a perfect scum-win out of it.
And here you're playing the exact same tactic.
Wow, that actually was a useful analog to this game. (why did you bring it up?)
a) i brought it up because i am town, and therefore lack a filter and also didn't bother to reread it before posting what i thought
b) i am pretty sure i actually read all posts in that game except the ones made by my extremely long winded scumbuddy, if i claimed otherwise i was probably lying
c) i only argued that those early points were bad because they were made against my own slot
d) i am not playing the exact same tactic of trying to get you lynched by pointing out your misreps and inconsistencies, you may not have noticed but i don't actually suspect you, your posts just annoy me