Why would you need a private thread if you are town?In post 12, TierShift wrote:So, are we gonna majority FoS or just let the groups decide for themselves? I'd prefer the latter.
And uh, are we getting private threads? The opening post hinted at it
Micro 309: Triplicate Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
You'd need one if you were scum to talk to your scumbuddies obviously. The OP mentions that it is in lieu of QTs. Why would the groups of 3 get anything analogous to QTs? That doesn't make any sense.In post 16, TierShift wrote:
Why would I need one if I were scum?In post 13, Blackfish wrote:
Why would you need a private thread if you are town?In post 12, TierShift wrote:So, are we gonna majority FoS or just let the groups decide for themselves? I'd prefer the latter.
And uh, are we getting private threads? The opening post hinted at it
I was wondering if the groups of 3 got a private forum but prolly not.-
-
Blackfish Goon
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
But it said "in lieu" of QT's. QTs are generally used by scum to talk among themselves. Why make the assumption that town would receive them?In post 20, TierShift wrote:I dunno, I saw 'this game is being used as a test case for private threads' and I just assumed.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Nothing about the nature of the game suggested that the three groups would have private communication. As far as I understood it, the group divisions are made solely for voting purposes and to help town with POE, with group members only being able to vote for themselves and town getting 2 confirmed townies when a mafia member is lynched. This I believe to counteract the mountainous effect of the game and provide a mechanic to help town in the absence of power roles. I assumed scum use the private threads instead of having a scum QT since that's what the OP implied. I am not following why I should think that the game implies town have private communication.In post 15, Who wrote:It's the fishes.
VOTE: Blackfish
Why would you assume that they are only for scum when the nature of the game (Town being divided into groups) implies that it could be for town as well?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I am curious, what would you rather discuss instead?In post 23, TierShift wrote:I'm purposely townslipping, duh.
No, I missed that part on my first read. I see 'test private threads' and '3 groups of 3'. Now let's stop discussing this.
Midget, there's no need to fear a quickhammer, since it only ends when all 3 groups have hammered and until then you can change votes.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Scum are obviously not stupid enough to ask publicly why they haven't received their QT links and Tiershift asking for it was either a towntell (or a fake one). I wasn't sure enough which so I pushed him to see if he reacted in an alignment revealing way. His response was a little sarcastic and dismissive which bothered me so I checked to see if it was alignment indicative for him to react that way in his other games and found nothing. I have a slight town lean based on his trying to shut down the discussion but it is not strong.In post 38, Who wrote:
I'm not saying it should be assumed, I'm merely saying it is an easy mistake to make. Also, why would scum be stupid enough to ask publicly?In post 24, Blackfish wrote:
Nothing about the nature of the game suggested that the three groups would have private communication. As far as I understood it, the group divisions are made solely for voting purposes and to help town with POE, with group members only being able to vote for themselves and town getting 2 confirmed townies when a mafia member is lynched. This I believe to counteract the mountainous effect of the game and provide a mechanic to help town in the absence of power roles. I assumed scum use the private threads instead of having a scum QT since that's what the OP implied. I am not following why I should think that the game implies town have private communication.In post 15, Who wrote:It's the fishes.
VOTE: Blackfish
Why would you assume that they are only for scum when the nature of the game (Town being divided into groups) implies that it could be for town as well?
As for your post, why did you jump in and answer for Tiershift before he had a chance to respond himself?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Why did you find it weird?In post 37, goodmorning wrote:Up to my last post I thought Town. Now? This continued pushing is a little aggressive, and I'm not really sure whether that's playstyle or something more sinister. It's also a little weird that he's focused on LM's not commenting on it and didn't mention that I didn't.
I focused on LM because he RVS voted as if there was nothing better to discuss while ignoring the discussion thathadtaken place. Your posts came across as prioritizing your own scumhunting of Tiershift by asking him why he wanted the groups to discuss among themselves as opposed to majority decisions.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
The phrasing of this post is odd. You "wanna" call my overt pushing more town? What does that mean? Does it mean that you want to but can't?In post 39, BipolarChemist wrote:I wanna call Blackfish's overt pushing more town. Pushing out of the RVS I find is always good and gets discussion going, which is clearly has.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Leaving out cross group discussion also keeps the other townies from influencing the other groups which I don't like. Looking at things on a larger scale allows us to draw connections and establish relational tells among everyone so that when we are out of our groups, we have even more interactions to work with in addition to just the in-group interactions.In post 49, RedCoyote wrote:To be clear, I am proposing we more or less completely leave out cross group discussion until D2 and let each group kind of decide their own fate. This is because this will automatically put the scum at a disadvantage, I think, by keeping them from working together to influence the other groups. Any thoughts on this?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
They are not mutually exclusive. You could still have asked me a question after you saw Tiershift respond to mine. Or phrased it in a way that didn't already give him an answer.In post 52, Who wrote:Because I cared far more about your response to my question than his response to yours.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Okay, I find it plausible but I wished you had let him answer.In post 57, Who wrote:I had a similar response to him when I saw the thing about private topics, the only difference was that I was on my phone and quoting one section of the first post would have been a hassle.
Why?In post 57, Who wrote:Well personally I'm more confident on my read of people within group coconut than any other group
We can hear the opinions of other players and allow them to influence the lynches and see where they lead. Constraining ourselves to just our groups feels like deliberately cutting off the amount of information we gain.In post 57, Who wrote:As regards "optimal play", I think that without the ability to vote for one another then normal (What everyone is used to analyzing) play will not occur, and we will not be able to effectively analyze what does go on.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Interacting with other groups helps us influence the lynch happening in those groups. I don't understand any need to curtail that interaction in any way. The voting will obviously be made by the group members but that doesn't mean the others shouldn't tell them who to vote for and attempt to influence those votes. I find it a pro-scum strategy to limit it.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
First, I found your post 42 odd but wasn't sure if it was just your playstyle or alignment indicative. In particular, you saying "interesting" to BC's townread on me and the "not attaching value judgment" phrase. I like that BRO picked up on it and the way he responded felt genuine. Second, I like his point about associative tells and his confidence in his scumhunting abilities. Tonally, he comes across as somewhat frustrated that most people aren't good scumhunters. It feels very natural and not like fake bravado. Third, him pointing out that RedCoyote was worried about a rather strange thing which mirrored what I thought too. Overall, his posts feel natural and I like his tone and content.In post 72, goodmorning wrote:
What do you like about them? Because I obviously disagree.In post 67, Blackfish wrote:I like BRO's posts. All of them. So, that's my first solid townread that I have a lot of confidence behind.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Why is this scummy?In post 75, Formerfish wrote:whoever said Blackfish was town for continuing to push a bullshit tell. That's who I'd be looking at as scum.-
-
Blackfish
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Yeah.In post 83, BROseidon wrote:Are you an alt?
Why? And I'd like your thoughts on any other reads you have as well.In post 81, LeMidget wrote:I haven't really looked into page 3 and the latter half of 2 yet so I don't know much about Who but I have a 65.89% townread on you, 18.67% scumread on you, and the other 15.44% in constantly in flux.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I don't like this post.In post 76, BipolarChemist wrote:Do you think Blackfish's overt pushing is too much to the point of being scummy? Or maybe overzealous town?
I'm leaning overzealous town, but he is quickly picking some fights early in the game, which could lead to a decent sized distraction.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I don't like this post for several reasons.In post 76, BipolarChemist wrote:Do you think Blackfish's overt pushing is too much to the point of being scummy? Or maybe overzealous town?
I'm leaning overzealous town, but he is quickly picking some fights early in the game, which could lead to a decent sized distraction.
The first is the hedging. You lean overzealous town on me but you also think that I could be scum. It feels like a whole lot of nothing.
The second is the content. How am I "picking fights" and "leading to a distraction?" At the point I was pushing the game forward, the only discussion in thread was what I generated to get us out of RVS. It wasn't like there was a ton of content that I trying to bury by creating pointless side arguments. Besides, how is pushing on people and questioning them a "distraction?" That's how the game is played.
The third is your phrasing of my actions. "Picking fights early in the game" as opposed to "scumhunting, questioning people", "overzealous" as opposed to "pro-active". You spin my actions in a negative way which is at odds with your townread on me. It feels more like you are trying to justify a scumread and strikes me as dissonant like you don't actually believe in your read but you think it is a read that you should have if you were town. (Calling the aggressive, active players town is a fairly common scum strategy).
Your townread on me overall feels slimy and wobbly. If you didn't think that I was town, there would be no reason to announce it. But, you say that I am town anyways (unnecessarily) despite the fact that you don't actually seem to have a read with any amount of confidence.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Why do you find it scummy that I am uncertain about whether there is scum in our group and asked LeMidget about his own reads? Why does my being an alt have anything to do with it?In post 101, BROseidon wrote:
I'd place a vote on this, especially given your alt-status, but I can't.In post 80, Blackfish wrote:I am not sure yet. Do you?
Other people in Blackfish's group, pls vote blackfish kthx.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I think the answer is fairly obvious. I wanted to generate discussion, kickstart the game, force people to take positions, and hopefully develop alignment revealing information. It could have been nothing. I could have just sat around and been more passive. I just chose not to.In post 98, LeMidget wrote:Why not? He brings up an honest point. Why did you focus on the Private Thread thing for so long, anyway? What made you think it wasn't just nothing?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
This doesn't answer my question. Why do you find aggression and controlling the lynches of the day to be scum motivated behaviors. Aren't they things that both scum and town aim for?In post 111, BipolarChemist wrote:
I've seen it quite often that the loud player of the day either gets lynched or controls the lynch. When someone is being so aggressive, mafia have a good chance of getting them lynched if the loud player is town. They can also get the lynch with having very little, if any, flack coming their way.In post 108, Blackfish wrote:I don't want to reveal my main although I wouldn't mind if you still want it after the game.
Both scum and town try to control the lynches of the day. Why does that give you cause for concern? Would you expect town to lie down and not attempt to control who gets lynched?-
-
Blackfish
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I disagree that mafia in general try to lynch aggressive townies as opposed to townread them but it really depends on who the scum are and some scum may try it but I can buy that you legitimately think that.In post 114, BipolarChemist wrote:
I find over-aggression to either be dangerous for a townie, as it could lead to an easy lynch that mafia could drive, or as mafia it could allow for mafia to have control over the day. Either way, I find over-aggression bad and I'm worried you're bordering on overly aggressive.In post 112, Blackfish wrote: This doesn't answer my question. Why do you find aggression and controlling the lynches of the day to be scum motivated behaviors. Aren't they things that both scum and town aim for?
Why do you believe aggressive scum can control the lynch but not aggressive town?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
How so? He asked me a question to which the answer is obvious. He thought BC was honest. The post you quoted read fairly null to me.In post 116, goodmorning wrote:
Because he's acting like it.In post 113, Blackfish wrote:GoodMorning, why is LeMidget town?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Your explanation is somewhat simplistic and I again disagree but I think it is plausible that you as town could genuinely think that.In post 118, BipolarChemist wrote:Because there are two scum working together and the one town would be alone. It's simply power in numbers and I see an aggressive scum being able to control a lynch more than aggressive town.
Can you provide a list of your reads?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Okay, I have another solid townread: BC based on reading both games and his completed towngame onsite and analyzing his responses to my questioning. The things he is pointing out as scummy matches up with what he would find scummy as town. His thoughts about "loud" players being easy to lynch or controlling lynches checks out as well as his actual beliefs and is null at worst. His reactions to me overall feel town and what I'd expect from him as town. If you want me to elaborate on any part of my reasoning, let me know.
With strong townreads on BRO and BC, I am leaning towards wanting FF lynched out of their group but I'll be interested in hearing how he responds to all this and see if theirs is the all-town group.-
-
Blackfish
-
-
Blackfish Goon
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I explained why I pushed Tiershift: I wanted to see if he was faking towntells or if he genuinely made a mistake. By doing that, I generated discussion and pushed the game past RVS. I disagree that scum has an advantage in doing it. How does it cut off associative tells? In fact, by forcing people to comment on it, I increased the amount of information and associative tells that we gained. Putting a stop to RVS is objectively pro-town. I agree that scum may do it but the motivation is to blend in with the town by doing pro-town things, not to cut off associative tells.In post 134, Formerfish wrote:It came off to me as making noise about a non issue to appear active and in the process of scumhunting. I also don't really like it when people try to get town cred for pushing the game past rvs. Scum also has an advantage in doing that because it gives town less to go off of in regards to associative tells. This game is a little different but it focused the discussion on the pretty magicians assistant and we missed the trick being set up.
Firstly, read the thread. It was BipolarChemist who had townread me. You seem to have a scumread on the guy townreading me yet you barely even remember who it is.In post 134, Formerfish wrote:We have no way of telling if the way you are acting is alignment indicative at all. At best this is a null tell and shouldn't have been used at all. The fact that you got town read for it is bullshit and suspect.
Secondly, I disagree with your BC scumread. I've been active, scumhunting, asking questions, and pushing the game forward. If I were an objective outsider, I'd probably townread my slot pretty heavily. I think BC's leaning-town read on me makes sense from a town POV. Your posts are missing the depth of scumhunting that I saw in BipolarChemist's posts. Where as you focused on the fact that I disagreed with you on Tiershift, BipolarChemist looked at the bigger picture. He tried to get at my underlying motivation for acting the way I did speculating that I could be trying to control the lynch as either affiliation. He then wondered as to how and why scum would be able to control the lynch. He is trying to see if my actions line up more with town or scum. In being stuck on my initial question to Tiershift, you are missing the big picture.
In post 134, Formerfish wrote:
I hope you don't do this often. It's a pet peeve of mine when people make an empty post like this. It allows the allusion of hunting by letting others fill in your blanks. If you don't like a post say why, makes things a bit harder as scum because it starts to pin them down.In post 96, Blackfish wrote:
I don't like this post.In post 76, BipolarChemist wrote:Do you think Blackfish's overt pushing is too much to the point of being scummy? Or maybe overzealous town?
I'm leaning overzealous town, but he is quickly picking some fights early in the game, which could lead to a decent sized distraction.
1) BRO has made a similar post 101. You haven't commented on it at all. Why not?
2) It shows a lack of reading the thread. I explained what I didn't like about BC's post here in post 104. Did you miss it?-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I am not confident about our group yet although I am leaning towards it being Who as well.In post 135, LeMidget wrote:Um, at this stage in the game, I'd like to ask Blackfish to put his vote on Who. I'm fairly certain that you can unvote even if there's a lynch until all three lynches are satisfied.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
What do you like about it?In post 137, TierShift wrote:
Me likesIn post 101, BROseidon wrote:
I'd place a vote on this, especially given your alt-status, but I can't.In post 80, Blackfish wrote:I am not sure yet. Do you?
Other people in Blackfish's group, pls vote blackfish kthx.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Okay, why do you find it scummy that I am uncertain about whether there is scum in our group and asked LeMidget about his own reads? Why does my being an alt have anything to do with it?In post 146, TierShift wrote:Because i thought along the same lines.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
In post 101, BROseidon wrote:
I'd place a vote on this,In post 80, Blackfish wrote:I am not sure yet. Do you?especially given your alt-status, but I can't.
Other people in Blackfish's group, pls vote blackfish kthx.Me likes[/quote]
You tell me.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Your justification for sharing the opinion is falling apart. I am not hard to talk you, I am asking you why you share the opinion. It should be fairly easy to justify if you are town. Instead, all of your responses have been very evasive.
1) BRO claims that (a) not being sure whether there is scum in my group and asking LeMidget for his opinion is scummy and (b) especially so since I am an alt.
2) You agree with it.
3) I ask you why you think it is scummy and why being an alt has anything to do with it.
4) You now claim that being an alt has nothing to do with it implying you don't fully agree with BRO's post. You are acting as though I am the one that brought forth the alt stuff. But, I'll be charitable and assume that you didn't think much of BRO's alt accusation and what you were agreeing with was just part (a) above.
5) Your first instinct is to be evasive. You claim "post 80 just sucked" without explaining why.
6) After being pushed on it, you claim, I haven't answered the question, which I have.
7) When I continue to ask why you find uncertainty scummy, you are now refusing to discuss it because you don't seem to be able to justify what you agree with. If you are town, this shouldn't be hard and there is no need to be evasive.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Yeah, okay I considered that you may not have agreed with the alt part so I'm putting that aside.
Why do find "bouncing back" after answering a question scummy? Why shouldn't I ask Tiershift his own opinion of whether he thinks there is a scum in the group? That would help me get a better read on him later on in the game by analyzing the positions he takes now. Considering he is my group, getting a read on him is crucial as I need to decide which of my groupmates to vote for.-
-
Blackfish
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I also don't like the "It's nothing major" part here. It feels like you are trying to downplay your read instead of justifying it.In post 155, TierShift wrote:I agreed with the spirit of the post, not necessarily with the alt part.
It's not the uncertainty that I find scummy, but the bouncing back.It's nothing major.
I didn't quote the post to show you were scummy, but to show why I thought bro was town.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
I've rarely seen anyone be this evasive before. Look, if you were bullshitting a read because you were skimming or weren't really thinking about BRO's post while you quoted him, or misunderstood it, that's fine. Just say exactly what you were thinking and how you misread it. I am not going to hold it against you if you misinterpreted something while you skimmed through the game. But for fucks sake, stop dodging my questions and trying so hard to brush it under the rug because it makes you look scummier and scummier. I want to see your thought process here and I don't really care if you made a mistake and own up to it. Did you skim through my post, miss my answer to LeMidget and thought that I had neglected to give an answer and found my post off for that reason? Take me through your thought process here.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Okay, cool?In post 165, RedCoyote wrote:
I've use these kinds of passive-aggressive, emotionally charged questions as scum before. I don't anymore, because I think they look scummy, especially when they're done poorly. This is a good example of that.In post 152, Blackfish wrote:Would you rather I pretend to be certain when I am not?
You are missing the point though.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
The point you are missing is that Tiershift claimed that me being unsure is scummy. If I actually am unsure, why would it be scummy? That's what I want to know from him? Wouldn't you like to know? He's in your group after all. Your focus is off. How I make my point is not the issue here and the question wasn't rhetorical.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
Your group wants to hang you RedCoyote. I didn't get the scum feel from you that your other groupmates did and I think so far you've been suspected for shit reasons. I planned to expose the scum in your group and convince your other group member to not stupid lynch you. Convince me I wasn't wrong. Get your head in the game and form coherent thoughts rather than isolated, irrelevant ones.-
-
Blackfish Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 148
- Joined: March 3, 2014
-
-
-
-
-
-