I mean, I guess final decision is up to the moderator, but I feel like the thread would get pretty ridiculous if aero let us include lists of randomly generated words.
VOTE: Guiltylion
In post 16, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:You can't think of any reason?
In post 25, lilac wrote:VOTE: Davsto
For wasting your vote on a non-player. You're hurting town, buddy.
In post 42, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:Also it is funny when you guys are saying it didn't do anything or help, making do exactly what I wanted and help exactly how I intended.
In post 67, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:@FA, nothing spectacular, no one attacking or defending me has done anything to stand out, with both sides have logical arguments. Me personally beveling my move is defend-able in logic, but poor in execution. The stand outs being Postie for the vote and follow up discussion, and Lilith the started asking questions which is good, but then they let Postie do the actual accusations while just agreeing, and they have yet to vote me which seems odd. I'm also waiting for Guilty Lion, see what they have to say.
VOTE: Lilith yeah I could see cautious scum here.
In post 93, Wednesday_ wrote:Should be a lot more active now I died in another game feels badman.
Town reading mgsv, guilty lion sounds town. I think postie might be town as well via mgsv insight.
VOTE: lilac post looks like backtracking from davsto.
In post 95, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 77, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:Wagons and pressure are great for pressuring scum, and rvs, but I'm not going to keep sitting on a null player just because my vote happened to be there most recently.
I don't really scumread you for this remark, but I do disagree with it. If a player is null to you then you should be trying to sort them and your vote is one way to help do that.
Like if you backtrack on a scumread and unvote as a result, that makes sense, but then to go nowhere with it afterwards feels directionless and doesn't give town new information.
I feel like we've stalled out some this week, I don't want to sound like an asshat but come on guys let's make some pushes and get some things going. Lilith! Why the unvote on TMWSTW? No comment on me jumping on you?
In post 110, Wednesday_ wrote:@lillith how long have you been playing mafia?
In post 109, Wednesday_ wrote:In post 100, lilith2013 wrote:Because I get scumread for it anyway, and it's part of my job as town to be as towny as possible so I'm trying to fix that by not being defensive about things, but I haven't really figured out what the alternative is.
I'm not liking this post.
In post 111, vandergeist wrote:I got prodded too, sorry I've been spending way too much time recently playing Fallout 7.
So all we need is Postie to start pressuring on a bizzare issue and we get all this support from weak side arguments (Lilith, Frozen Angel). Postie’s more town in my mind than Lilith and FA by far, Wednesday as well at least had better justification for joining the lilac wagon.
In post 123, vandergeist wrote:In post 122, lilith2013 wrote:Which bizarre issue was Postie pressuring about? Are you talking about lilac?
The self-voting and then lilac.
In post 124, vandergeist wrote:*why lilac was bizzare:
Lilac not being offensive enough -> why does she stand out from the other quieter players?
Lilac's Davsto vote -> it was RVS who gives a damn
Lilac's WIFOM -> I'm glad they felt the need to ask, I hadn't even thought about it. The possible WIFOM is a rabbit hole.
This misguided pressuring is a mess
In post 111, vandergeist wrote:I got prodded too, sorry I've been spending way too much time recently playing Fallout 7.
So all we need is Postie to start pressuring on a bizzare issue and we get all this support from weak side arguments (Lilith, Frozen Angel). Postie’s more town in my mind than Lilith and FA by far, Wednesday as well at least had better justification for joining the lilac wagon.
In post 126, lilith2013 wrote:Can you explain why Wednesday's reason for jumping on the wagon was better than FA's?
In post 111, vandergeist wrote:I got prodded too, sorry I've been spending way too much time recently playing Fallout 7.
So all we need is Postie to start pressuring on a bizzare issue and we get all this support from weak side arguments (Lilith, Frozen Angel). Postie’s more town in my mind than Lilith and FA by far, Wednesday as well at least had better justification for joining the lilac wagon.
In post 113, vandergeist wrote:Since msgV asked for these:
Townish - Postie, Wednesday, TMWSTW
Meh - GuiltyLion, Davsto, Lilac
Scumish - Lilith, FA
In post 102, Frozen Angel wrote:In my opinion your still trying to stay in RVS. seems fairly scummy in my opinion.
What gave you this impression?
In post 111, vandergeist wrote:So all we need is Postie to start pressuring on a bizzare issue and we get all this support from weak side arguments (Lilith, Frozen Angel). Postie’s more town in my mind than Lilith and FA by far
In post 56, Frozen Angel wrote:whats your read list lilac? you seems a hard trier . but it seems your just asking questions instead of answering any...
@TMWSTW whats the point of making people successfull about you to move the game out of RVS? I'm kind of lost in your logic here. I can't see town motivation for that ...
In post 134, Postie wrote:Yeah, I'm uncomfortable with pretty much every single person who has gotten on the lilac wagon's reasons for getting on the lilac wagon. Not a good sign.
UNVOTE:
In post 172, lilith2013 wrote:In post 134, Postie wrote:Yeah, I'm uncomfortable with pretty much every single person who has gotten on the lilac wagon's reasons for getting on the lilac wagon. Not a good sign.
UNVOTE:
What was your reason for being uncomfortable with FA being on lilac's wagon? Has that feeling gone away?
In post 186, GuiltyLion wrote:K after that latest post I'm thinking town on lilac and I'm pretty baffled at how confident some of you are that she's scum. That Postie vote makes no sense coming from scum, would expect her to vote lilith there.
Lilith you think she's probably town by virtue of the pressure on her, why aren't you pushing on those people? What are your reads on Wednesday and FA?
In post 191, lilith2013 wrote:[Lilac's] 183 is iffy and I'd like some more clarification on that, and an explanation of how she came to her other townreads, because if it's only through eliminating her scumreads then that's a bad way of forming townreads and I can see that as coming from scum.
In post 213, Postie wrote:In post 205, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:@Postie, why do you have Vender as "super town", I currently have them at null and have trouble wrapping my head around such a strong read.
Her thought process has completely mirrored mine in most places, and comes across as town to me for that reason.
In post 207, Wednesday_ wrote:@postie that looks like a reason to park a vote. I don't think anyone says that anymore. That you won't do something unless.
Me: "I'm voting you because you're doing a ridiculously scummy thing that I've only ever seen scum do."
You: "OMG stop vote parking."
??????????????????????????????????????
In post 207, Wednesday_ wrote:The disagreement is there because I made a post describing why it was backpedaling and why that self awareness was likely scum. Was that not obvious that I disagreed? I gave you the courtesy of saying so. Tell me why I should unvote lilac postie because I have yet to see you defend them.
I... know you disagree (you said "I disagree")? That's not what I'm asking. I'm quite clearly asking you to tell mewhyyou disagree with the things I explained in the post I quoted (97), hence me saying "why?". I'm baffled as to how something so simple is confusing you here.
And you still haven't explained anything.
Congrats, my vote isn't moving.
In post 96, Wednesday_ wrote:In post 82, lilac wrote:@Frozen I never said I had a problem with her voting for me. I'm just wondering why she chose me over Davsto. Was it partially random or did she notice something else that helped make up her mind?
My vote for Davsto was partially a random vote. He just happened to vote for the mod which doesn't help town. I see how my "parked vote" on him can mislead some people into thinking that I'm making a serious case against him. That would require sitting here at my computer and waiting to pounce like a cat when he slips, as opposed to keeping an eye on what others are saying and how they are contributing to the discussion.
UNVOTE: Davsto
So I don't befuddle anyone else.
Sorry. Post 82 is what I am refering to. You're supposed to read my mind postie. Lilac was self aware that her "parked vote" was atteacting attention. In reality only you postie were voting lilac. She called her vote partially random which means she saw something there t further says she wasn't intending to scum read him 'a serious case against him'. So she was making a case. I think lilac needs more pressure.
In post 224, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:In post 96, Wednesday_ wrote:
Sorry. Post 82 is what I am refering to. You're supposed to read my mind postie. Lilac was self aware that her "parked vote" was atteacting attention. In reality only you postie were voting lilac. She called her vote partially random which means she saw something there t further says she wasn't intending to scum read him 'a serious case against him'. So she was making a case. I think lilac needs more pressure.
Right so this is in direct response to
In post 97, Postie wrote:Well I'd assume the "partially random" thing meant that it wasn't fully random because she gave a reason, but it wasn't a "serious case" because the reason was an RVS-ish one. Makes sense to me and doesn't strike me as backpeddling at all.
So Wednesday later saying that the disagreement was already explained doesn't make sense because Postie was responding to that.
Person A Gives Argument A
Person B Disputes Argument A with Argument B
Person A says they disagree with Argument B
Berson B asks why
Person A says because Argument A and that doesn't work, they need to elaborate. Yes, all caught up, sorry.
In post 258, droog wrote:In post 71, lilith2013 wrote:In post 67, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:@FA, nothing spectacular, no one attacking or defending me has done anything to stand out, with both sides have logical arguments. Me personally beveling my move is defend-able in logic, but poor in execution. The stand outs being Postie for the vote and follow up discussion, and Lilith the started asking questions which is good, but then they let Postie do the actual accusations while just agreeing, and they have yet to vote me which seems odd. I'm also waiting for Guilty Lion, see what they have to say.
VOTE: Lilith yeah I could see cautious scum here.
I didn't vote you because I didn't think it was scummy and I never said it was, I said I didn't understand why you would self-vote because I don't think it helps us.Jumping on me for that after the fact--it happened like a page ago and you've posted since then, so why didn't you say this earlier or vote me when it happened?--that seems pretty scummy to me, though.
VOTE: TMWSTW
man did his neat voting trick to get reactions
he then voted you because he didnt like your reaction
what about that sequence is scummy
please explain
In post 274, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:In post 270, Postie wrote:In post 225, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:Just read Frozen's ISO, I suggest everyone should it's not long. I could go for FA lynch if we really aren't getting Lilac, they haven't done anything and their limited criticism of Lilac can almost entirely apply to themselves. Also guys, if people don't start putting more effort in day 2 I'll just policy lynch my way to LYLO.
What've you got against a Wednesday lynch?
I'm not against a Wednesday lynch but I was much more for Lilac and FA. My read for Wednesday is null, and based mostly on how they're making me feel by gut. Some of it has to do with how they're pinging me differently in another game I'm playing with them.
In post 256, droog wrote:In post 11, GuiltyLion wrote:Oh god now I'm not only analyzing people's posts for scum motivation I'm also dissecting them for word sneak motivation
the setup is cool but just a distraction
there's no penalty if i dont use all the words right
In post 273, droog wrote:In post 271, Postie wrote:What's your read on Wednesday?
very null
hes someone i want to interact with i think
In post 283, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 276, droog wrote:im not going to start a vanity wagon
i dont see any counters to lilac
im not opposed to a lilac wagon
but barring any major read changes im going to sit back
and try to see what else there is to do today
i will definitely hammer if needed
this is exactly where I am.
droog looks towny to me (also I'm a big fan of your posting style).
Lilith what's your read on lilac? I looked through your ISO and I don't think I see you taking a stance on her one way or the other.
In post 286, droog wrote:why are you sheeping man's wednesday case
when you're also worried about the 'collywobble'
In post 288, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:@Lilith it's gut null read based on this on going game and how they are acting different in another on going game. I'm only bringing it up because I was asked and that's how I feel, other than that discussing it further doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
In post 305, GuiltyLion wrote:her flip would tell me more about Davsto and lilith.
In post 287, lilith2013 wrote:In post 286, droog wrote:why are you sheeping man's wednesday case
when you're also worried about the 'collywobble'
Er.. Please explain how I am sheeping his case? Not even sure he has a case because he says she is null. Whereas I am voting her.
In post 321, Wednesday_ wrote:Why are you nerds debating between me and lilac? You realize other players exist yes? Am still hella busy. Instead of talking yourselves to death with lilac or wednesday put others in contention to see how they react you seriously don't expect me to believe you've done nothing but argue lilac or Wednesday? Jesus.
Welcome expediance. Unfortunately I'm not so kind as others might be to give you the courtesy of an unvote. You should ask the mod for an extension by the way it would help me loads.
In post 319, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 307, lilith2013 wrote:In post 305, GuiltyLion wrote:her flip would tell me more about Davsto and lilith.
How so?
You seem pretty intent on avoiding the lilac wagon, I thought Davsto's vote on it was weakest. If lilac flips town, townpoints for you, scumpoints for Davsto.
If lilac flips scum, scumpoints for you and townpoints for Davsto.
The opposite scenario on Wednesday doesn't really work because Davsto jumped on lilac but has no reason to switch to Wednesday regardless of his alignment.