Micro 615: The Walking Dead: Episode 5 (GAME OVER)

WhiteLight · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon May 30, 2016 4:26 pm

In post 24, SirCakez wrote:Why is this voteworthy shotty?

Why isn't it vote worthy in RVS?

VOTE: SirCakez

ISO · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon May 30, 2016 4:31 pm

He answered a question for someone in RVS. I don't see how that's scummy at all, I would have answered it myself and I'm town.

pirate mollie · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon May 30, 2016 5:04 pm

guapo's law: don't answer questions that are aimed at some1 other than you. it interferes with the person who is asking the question's scumhunting.

are we out of rvs yet? it feels like we are out of rvs

HI MAV ARE YOU SCUM THIS GAME?

Maverick1102 · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon May 30, 2016 11:51 pm

Let's aim for me actually being active before you try to suss my alignment out Mollie.

ISO · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 12:40 am

Thank you Mollie, that's about what I was going for although I didn't know there was a law for it.

Also 28 strikes me as odd because why wouldn't town want their alignment to be determined immediately?

Also also I just realized 8 is also weird because it implies that Java read the post before his, but not the one two posts before that. Probably means nothing though. COME ON PEOPLE POST MORE SO I CAN SORT YOU PLEASE AND THANK YOU.

ISO · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 12:40 am

In post 29, Something_Smart wrote:Also also... also

whoops lmao

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 12:43 am

In post 23, Something_Smart wrote:omg somebody else is alive
2 questions to you, shotty:
#1 what is the meaning of 13?
#2: why did you make post 22?

Read last episode, and it was weird java felt he needed to answer for me.

ISO · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 12:44 am

but you were already voting him

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 12:47 am

In post 32, Something_Smart wrote:but you were already voting him

Ya but the first vote was super rvs. Him answering for me was legitimately scummy

ISO · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 12:49 am

In post 33, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 32, Something_Smart wrote:but you were already voting him
Ya but the first vote was super rvs. Him answering for me was legitimately scummy

Why is that, and why did you not just say "vote is now serious"?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 1:03 am

In post 34, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 33, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 32, Something_Smart wrote:but you were already voting him
Ya but the first vote was super rvs. Him answering for me was legitimately scummy
Why is that, and why did you not just say "vote is now serious"?

I had forgotten who I RVSd and my reasoning is self explanatory

ISO · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 1:09 am

I don't think it's self explanatory. Did you think it was scum just because it was "strange"?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 1:19 am

In post 36, Something_Smart wrote:I don't think it's self explanatory. Did you think it was scum just because it was "strange"?

It's scummy any time someone answers for someone

ISO · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 2:59 am

What's the scum motivation behind answering questions for someone?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 4:35 am

SS could be scum.

pirate mollie · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 6:28 am

In post 28, Maverick1102 wrote:Let's aim for me actually being active before you try to suss my alignment out Mollie.

you look very nervous to me mav. I understand that this is your first game outside of newbies yeah? I want to get to the heart of why you are coming across as nervous, whether it is cos you are scum or cos you are in a game where every1 else seems to know each other and are all about the inside jokes during rvs.

don't worry tho, I will be gentle.

pirate mollie · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 6:34 am

In post 39, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:SS could be scum.

:/

Radja · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 6:35 am

Day 1, VC 2

pirate mollie (2)

-

Javajoe24, Maverick1102

Something_Smart (2)

-

BlueBloodedToffee, GuiltyLion

Javajoe24 (1)

-

drmyshottyizsik

GuiltyLion (1)

-

SirCakez

WhiteLight (1)

-

Something_Smart

SirCakez (1)

-

WhiteLight

Not Voting (1)

-

pirate mollie

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch! Deadline is on June 13th at 08:00 PM(GMT+1) or in (expired on 2016-06-13 20:00:00).

Mod Notes - N/A

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 7:04 am

Already doubting me Mollie?

GuiltyLion · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 7:45 am

In post 34, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 33, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 32, Something_Smart wrote:but you were already voting him
Ya but the first vote was super rvs. Him answering for me was legitimately scummy
Why is that, and
why did you not just say "vote is now serious"?

I don't like this question one bit

VOTE: Something_Smart
Vote is now serious

pirate mollie · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 7:49 am

In post 43, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Already doubting me Mollie?

why yes. yes I am.

ISO · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 7:56 am

@Guilty: what about it don't you like?

BlueBloodedToffee · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 8:03 am

Any reason for that?

GuiltyLion · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 8:08 am

Something_Smart wrote:@Guilty: what about it don't you like?

It's written as if you have a phrase ("vote is now serious") that you want him to say, and are pressuring him on the basis of not literally saying that phrase.

It's not a logical way to scumhunt, seems more like just finding something arbitrary to make a push on. Further, I don't see how shotty's response to that question is likely to help townies sort him. What were you looking for in his response?

ISO · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Tue May 31, 2016 8:20 am

I was looking to see if he'd fumble (for instance by admitting he knew his vote was already there when he obviously didn't).

I know it's not an ideal way to scumhunt, but there's barely any content to analyze. I'm just trying to spark conversation.

Finally, I'd like to know why you called it a "push".