Micro 618 {Over}
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
In post 1, Ranger wrote:Game will start when your 48 hours have elapsed, or we have 7 confirmations. (Whichever comes first.) I will not count votes or topic requests made prior to then, however, day will begin once one of those two conditions has been fulfilled regardless of whether I'm here to announce it or not.I'm reading this as 7 have confirmed, Day has started, votes count.
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I just want to clarify, and I know SOMEONE will jump on me for this, but it is a genuine question about the mechanics:
If werevolves have no factional NK, and only kill Town through lynching and vengekill resulting from lynching, can't Town actually peacefully co-exist with werewolves indefinitely, as long as we never lynch? I mean, with no NK, they pose no threat to Town unless we lynch.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
A-HA! GOTCHA! NowIn post 23, MURDERCAT wrote:Werewolves control the vote if town doesn't vote so it doesn't work. Read the rule I posted above, it's important.you'vemademelook dumb, which is EXACTLY what you accused me of doing to you. That's hypocrisy, which is a scum trait. My vote stands.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Comedic purposes.In post 33, BNL wrote: Why switch votes in RVS?-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
It's a half-OMGUS, since I am only OMGUSing one of your heads. My RVS technique is evolving, thanks to an ongoing game I can't discuss. I feel like I have more of an insight into RVS now, and am approaching it a bit differently. Why are you so keen to get us out of RVS?In post 43, ReallySick wrote:
is this an OMGUS?In post 39, Chip Butty wrote:I'm reading Realeo as Town, but I'm pretty certain Sick is scum.
I would like you to address my points. why you are not playing as your town meta.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
You're voting me for "potentially carnivorous"? Have you looked at your scumbuddy MURDERCAT'S avatar?In post 32, ReallySick wrote:VOTE: Chip Butty
for potentially carnivorous and to be honest, I have a hunch that BulletNLynchproof is town.
~ Realeo
Also, did you mean to tie your vote on me to your hunch about BNLP? And is your hunch based on his superior math skills? As far as I know, that's NAI.
@Sick head: It's the weekend, dawg. Chill. Discussion will pick up once people are in a position to steal from their employers by playing at woork.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Um, we can't get out of RVS until we have somewhere to do - i.e. someone picks up a semi-serious lead to follow. If you've got one of those, by all means lead the way...In post 51, ReallySick wrote:
The reason I want to get out of RVS:
the point of RVS is to generate the discussion, and the discussion is not happening.
Staying in the RVS is not Pro-Town.
~ Sickofit-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I guess the game you're referring to mainly is Open 640, the one we played in together, right? If you go back and look at that, you'll see that I did place two joke votes at the start (Kappy, Aneninen) and, more importantly, that I came out of RVS thinking both were scum, when they were not. Also, I thought you were scum, and prob Shotty too, and you were both Town too. So, I'm being a little more cautious. Also, as you and others have pointed out, there hasn't been a great deal of public posting, so there really isn't much to go on yet. If you see something you think is scummy, and it isn't me, by all means point it out and I'll look at it. If itIn post 59, ReallySick wrote:I agree with this.
I'm still slightly reading chipbutty as scum still.
@Chipbutty
I like the analytic style better. It's a better town style then what you are doing now. You shouldn't change it IMOisme, I'll try to alleviate your concerns as best I can.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Nothing has really pinged me yet. Again, I'm hoping things will pick up after the weekend. In Newbie 1704, I again had Kappy to get me started. That time, he WAS scum. I think he is one of those players who just looks scummy whether they are or not.In post 63, ReallySick wrote:i was referring to all the meta on you i can find.
Those are my only two completed games here, so it's all I can discuss.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I guess if anything looks weird so far, it is this...In post 50, ReallySick wrote:
I have a theory, but the theory is (1) not conclusive (2)normally, I would be glad to explain it, but explaining the theory will be synonymous with [redacted] (3) who the hell picks up read from RVS?
Hence, the reason I used the word "hunch" =P.
~Realeo
1. No-one is expecting a conclusive theory out of RVS. That shouldn't stop you from posting it.
2. WTF?
3. You two heads need to discuss this among yourselves - as far as I can see, Realio is saying we can't pick up reads from RVS, while Sick is insisting that we do. personally, I agree with Sick on this.
There you go, Sick - analytical enough for you?-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
In post 61, Chip Butty wrote: I guess the game you're referring to mainly is Open 640, the one we played in together, right? If you go back and look at that, you'll see that I did place two joke votes at the start (Kappy, Aneninen) and, more importantly, that I came out of RVS thinking both were scum, when they were not. Also, I thought you were scum, and prob Shotty too, and you were both Town too.So, I'm being a little more cautious. Also, as you and others have pointed out, there hasn't been a great deal of public posting, so there really isn't much to go on yet. If you see something you think is scummy, and it isn't me, by all means point it out and I'll look at it. If itisme, I'll try to alleviate your concerns as best I can.
1. Think it should be obvious from the sentence highlighted in green and what preceded it that I was specifically and clearly saying I am being more cautious in reading people as scum and expending time and effort going after them. Because it would obviously be better to spend that time and energy on real scum, rather than a Town who has managed to look scummy.In post 94, ReallySick wrote:[quote="In
Town doesnt need to be cautious IMO. Scum needs to blend in more than town does.In post 61, Chip Butty wrote:So, I'm being a little more cautious.
*deflects conversation away from himself*In post 67, Chip Butty wrote:Sick, do you know Real's reasoning for thinking BNLP is Town? Could one of you explain it please?
2. So, if I ask a question, I am "deflecting attention away from myself"? Are you going to interpret all questions that way? Or are you just trying to make me look bad? This isveryreachy, and I am going to give you an official FOS for this post.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
In post 76, JaeReed wrote: Chip, does this mean you are scumreading Murder? If so, why? If not, why did you make this comment?
Yeah, MC is right - it was just a joke about our avatars. Not scumreading MC right now, but I see someone is pointing a finger at him (Sick, I think?) so will look at his ISO.In post 77, MURDERCAT wrote:(I think its a joke about being carnivorous)-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I've got to say, that takes the biscuit as one of the most bizarre posts I have ever seen in a game of Mafia. But, okay, Realeo - can you be more specific and point out just which midnight (in which specific timezone?) posts were so "shitty"?In post 113, ReallySick wrote:Before we proceed, how many of you are Americans?
I came to my observation that a lot of people made shitty post during midnight--due to exhaustion--so knowing your time zone helps. You will be surprised that a staggering huge proportion of shitty argument came around midnight--so I need to take concern of your local time, are you mafia with stupid argument or are you town with exhausted brain?
I myself an Indonesian and that's +7 GMT
~Realeo-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I'm not understanding much of this.In post 99, ReallySick wrote:
I can't. It's dumb and has something to do with something else.Sick, do you know Real's reasoning for thinking BNLP is Town? Could one of you explain it please?
If I am right, this is sarcasm right?No-one is expecting a conclusive theory out of RVS. That shouldn't stop you from posting it.
The reason I posted the hunch wasBNLP at L-2. With experience of being put at L-1 at page 6, I feel compulsory to declare that I'm not going put him at L-1.
You two heads need to discuss this among yourselves - as far as I can see, Realio is saying we can't pick up reads from RVS, while Sick is insisting that we do. personally, I agree with Sick on this.
I don't care if our methodology conflicts--in fact, it's better thus we have more perspective,as long we don't conflict in fos.
I tr BNLP. He fos ChipButty and MURDERCAT. No conflict so far although we have to admit that we haven't have mutual agreement.
~Realeo
1. You (Realeo) continue to tr BNLP, but you can't say why and you admit the reason is "dumb"? And what is this "something else"? You seem to be saying you were concerned he was at L-2. Why? That's not such a big deal in RVS. He's not going to be quicklynched. Why did you find it "compulsory" to announce you weren't going to vote him to L-1? Why not just say that, rather than you had a hunch he is Town? Those are two different things.
2. No, I wasn't being sarcastic. I meant what I said - you can still post your theory, even if it is not conclusive at this point. I mean, lookat your other head, Sick, pointing fingers at me and MC. He probably goes too far, though, pointing fingers with too little justification. It just looks weird that you are not backing away from your "hunch" but you can't explain the basis of it.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
BTD, can you link to completed games with examples of this, please?In post 104, BTD6_maker wrote: How was my vote scummy? It is consistent with my RVS vote from other games, where I vote someone for having a name suggesting a role that they don't have.
Are we looking for a claim from BTD here?-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
This is pinging me. Leaning scum on karnos now.In post 119, karnos wrote:VOTE: BTD That makes L-1 by my count.
Please don't hammer BTD immediately unless you are a wolf. Let him stew for a bit.
I'm also not happy to see RS on this wagon, given other reasons I am suspicious of them.
MC I'm not sure about. Will reserve judgement for now.
Would scum be so dumb as to have both jump so blatantly on a wagon so blatantly, and so early D1?-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Links, please...In post 126, MURDERCAT wrote:VOTE: Karnos
Off the top of my head I can think of two games where scum went to a really early L-1, and I only have 5 completed games.
Why not? Do you think Town is likely to hammer? Do you think there is a scum not on the wagon yet?In post 126, MURDERCAT wrote: Plus I don't want him at L-1.
This quick jump-off when challenged pings me...-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
MC: Also, if you think there is a scum not on that wagon yet, do you think they would be likely to hammer and draw attention to themselves, especially after karnos asked Town not to hammer?
In short, do you really think BTD was in danger of being quicklynched? like I say, your quick hop off so soon after hopping on looks a little panicked...-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
But we can still go look at them, I guess...It's a pity the only example you can point to is a game in which you were scum. Not exactly a ringing endorsement...In post 135, BTD6_maker wrote:
Look at Open 638. (Admittedly, I was scum but this is something I generally do regardless of alignment. I can't link the others as they are all ongoing).In post 120, Chip Butty wrote:
BTD, can you link to completed games with examples of this, please?In post 104, BTD6_maker wrote: How was my vote scummy? It is consistent with my RVS vote from other games, where I vote someone for having a name suggesting a role that they don't have.
Are we looking for a claim from BTD here?-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
In post 116, ReallySick wrote:Is it from an ongoing game?
Earlier, it looked like you were suggesting you couldn't discuss it because it was from an ongoing game. Now you are saying you both just want to keep it to yourselves for undisclosed reasons? I dunno, seems odd to me...In post 145, ReallySick wrote: I can explain it but I can't explain it to you. I would like to keep it for a while and sickofit agrees with me that we should keep it for a while.
You may keep bugging me about this but neither sickofit nor me will explain it for the time being.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Uh, no. Read my 121, 127, 128, 129 for concern at BTD being at L-1. And it's kind of weird that you accuse me of this, given that your vote remains on BTD. Also, questioning MC was directly connected to that wagon on BTD, given that MC was on that wagon and jumped off right away in response to being challenged.In post 146, ReallySick wrote:@ChipButty: When I was reading your ISO--it seem that you're too relaxed for a concept of people being put at L-1.
Granted, my concern at BPLP was a little bit premature--but your seem to be too relaxed about BTD wagon and start questioning MURDERCAT. I mean, there's only 7 days left at the clock so a lynch there won't be so weird.
Huh? My vote is on MC. That vote was placed during RVS, but I decided to leave it there when MC jumped on the BTD wagon. But, you know, you're right. I think it is time to place a serious vote.In post 146, ReallySick wrote: And you haven't use your vote?
For reasons already stated, and generally weird behavior: VOTE: REALLY SICK-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
How do you think it should be played?In post 156, karnos wrote:I don't think this game should be played the same way more standard setup based games are.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I think there might be a way to guarantee that Town doesn't lose:In post 160, karnos wrote:I'm not sure, but I am thinking there might be some sort of way to break the setup and nearly guarantee a town win.
Start 7/2.
Town agrees to (1) All UNVOTE and (2) Lynch the first person to vote after that. Assuming all Town comply:
If wolves don't dare to vote, indefinite peace. If one wolf votes, then worst-case scenario, he squeezes a vote in just before Dayend and lynches a Town, so 6/2.
D2, we lynch that motherfucker, and he gets his two vengekills: 4/1.
D3, we repeat the strategy from D1. No Town votes. If the remaining scum doesn't dare to vote, indefinite peace. If he does vote, worst case scenario he lynches a Town, so 3/1.
D4, The remaining three Town lynch the remaining scum, and WIN.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
But now that we are aware of it, if we don't do it we will be playing against wincon, since competng strategies would tend to be worse for Town.In post 181, Dionysus and Ariadne wrote:This is ridiculous because it's completely against the spirit of the game we're playing, but I'm p sure you're town for suggesting it~
Maybe you don't like it because you're a wolf, hmmm?-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
So if we are both right, we'll be playing against wincon if we do it, and playing against wincon if we don't do it.In post 183, JaeReed wrote:It's technically playing against win con for no one to vote imo. If no one dies then everyone should lose after a set period of phases pass. As Ariadne said it's against the spirit of the game.
What kind of werewolves don't have NK, anyway? Werechihuahuas, more like...-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Note: Townslip...In post 187, ReallySick wrote: first of all, i think they would have found an easy broken town win if there was one. i believe there may be a Wolf PR that might prevent this strategy from working.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I suspect wolf!D&A picked the fakehammer and thought Town!BTD didn't pick the fakehammer and thus that his seer claim is genuine. So she fakeclaimed to get a real hammer before the fakehammer came to light. She even called for a realhammer.
And who leapt in to carry out that claim for a realhammer? MC, who forgot that karnos had unvoted.
Also, it was D&A who questioned BTD on the Cop v Seer thing...again, trying to secure the realhammer before the fakehammer came to light.
Prob MC second wolf.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: D&A-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Apologies for being a bit absent lately. Will post tomorrow, including an answer to this question. Think I've taken on a bit much with five games.In post 374, BNL wrote:
But why leave D&A? Why would you rather vote Murdercat than D&A, having both as scum?In post 351, Chip Butty wrote:Well, MC is my choice for second wolf, so I don't mind taking him to
L-1.
VOTE: MURDERCAT-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Okay, I'm back. I'm in five games, and I'm starting to think I've taken on a little too much. Mercifully, one of them is in night phase now.In post 374, BNL wrote:
But why leave D&A? Why would you rather vote Murdercat than D&A, having both as scum?In post 351, Chip Butty wrote:Well, MC is my choice for second wolf, so I don't mind taking him to
L-1.
VOTE: MURDERCAT
Basically I left D&A because (1) There didn't seem to be enough interest in a D&L wagon for today - and the only other vote on him was BTD, the other "fakeseer"; (2) I wan't too sure what to make of the BDT/D&L / claims/fakeclaims / fakehammers trainwreck to be sure enough to keep my vote on D&L. When I voted D&A in 277, I nominated MC for second wolf, so that's where I swung my vote.
I'm going to have to reread and see what I make of all that now, and also what I think of MC now. Since I accused him, he has stopped whispering to me. Since this is a brand-new mechanic, I'm not sure what to make of that.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Am I missing something? Seer would only be blocked if the RB knew who he was, or got lucky, right?In post 432, BTD6_maker wrote:Imagine there is a Seer and an RB.
You can try that idea but it will never work as I will constantly be roleblocked every night and will never find scum. This setup is not broken.
I have a slight cold - how did you know?In post 432, BTD6_maker wrote: By the way, are you Sick? Please sign all posts.
- Chip-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Wait, sorry I must be thick, but I'm not following. Why would BTD know there is a RB if he is Seer? And what about the possibility of a jailkeeper or an alpha wolf?In post 435, ReallySick wrote:yes that was me.
ok BTD. If there was a RB than if you were cop... you wouldnt have outed yourself until last minute... not early in the day.
If you are cop... than you know for sure that there is an RB.
you are not a cop.
you are not a seer.
~ Sick
In fact, now that I think about it, an AW seems a more likely counter to a seer, because a RB/JK would have to get lucky to hit the seer early in the game, so my breaking plan could go quite far before the seer got taken out.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Spare us the Townslips.In post 441, ReallySick wrote:Alpha wolf? letme check on that
An AW is the werewolf equivalent to a godfather. Returns "Not werewolf" to seer investigationss.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Normally I would disagree but because of the vengekills and the micropool, this might not be a bad approach.In post 492, karnos wrote: Oh, I agree, we should lynch someone we think is scum. But there should be two scum, and looking for another scum instead of lynching BTD first seems like a smart plan to me.
@All: Have to go out now, but will think the game over when I return.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Are you sure? Link? This is just a few posts after you "slipped" that you didn't know what an Alpha Wolf is...In post 448, ReallySick wrote: AlphaWolf and Seer: i stated above why this is absolutely fine for town as well-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Okay, I don't have any more time to spend on this right now, and might not get back before the deadline. So:
1. I think BTD's ISO still looks SAF. I've talked about the pre-fakehammer stuff before. I was kind of inclined to believe him over D&A earlier, but now I noticed the time elapsed between the fakehammer and his first response was about an hour, which is plenty time to plan a response. Hence I'm not prepared to give him Towncred for anything there. He has given reads on several plaeyers, but nothing much very detailed or original. lately he just seems to be tunneled on setup-related issues and trying to find setups that will support his claim.
2. If there is a seer in this game, there has to be a counterbalance or the game is broken. If it is an RB, then Seer!BTD is broken because the RB can just block him every night, now that he is outed. An Alpha doesn't seem like a strong enough counterbalance, so it prob isn't that.
On the other hand, looking at BNLP's ISO, he actually asks a lot of questions and, on the surface at least, seems to be investigating. I'll need to take a deeper look at him later, but for now he looks not too bad. MC is looking a bit better to me now, but still not sure about him. I think karnos is probTown, partly because of his fakehammer, and partly because he pointed out that, with a Seer, my gamebreak plan could actually ensire a Town win. I don't see a clear scum motivation for that that would outweight the risk that Town might go for the plan. There are a couple others I am a bit suspicious of - RS, for e.g. - and others I will keep to myself for now.
VOTE: BTD-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I just want to point out that MC was the L-1 vote on the BNLP wagon, not the first...
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
Yeah, this. Strengthens my Town read on karnos.In post 528, karnos wrote:7.5 hours to deadline, I'm thinking my vote isn't going to make a difference. At least with the setup being what it is, we don't have to worry about nightkills.
I hope I am wrong, but I really don't think BNL has been acting scummy.
BulletNLynchproof (4) Murdercat ReallySick Dionysus and Ariadne JaeReed (L-1)
At least one scum pushing that wagon, possibly both.
Well, it looks like, under the plurality rule, BNLP is gonna hang today, unless something happens real soonish. For the record, I can't say I really like it, or the looks of the wagon on him.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
This isn't good. If BNLP is a mislynch, as I suspect, then when you factor in the two vengekills when we hit scum, we're already at 4/1 in the best case scenario.
Because micropool, it looks like vengekills + plurality voting is enough to balance out the lack of NKs, and maybe more than enough. I'm thinking that there prob aren't PRs, just on the basis that the setup has a kind of elegance about it, and PRs would look a bit ham-fisted here. That's just gut, though. I think the tool we have been given here to fight scum is the whisper mechanic, but that is a double-edged sword. D2 I will try to make more use of it.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
In post 515, Charloux wrote:I know i don't have the right to say this based on my activity but,why on earth are you guessing the game setup 12 hours before the deadline?!
If you can't decide who to lynch, then just go to random.org or something. The only ones who have a clue of the setup are PR's(If any) and scum. So i can only see scum gaining from mere speculations.
We have no claimed Seer, so lynching town delibaretly is a bad idea if you ask me.
VOTE: Karnos
Since i didn't even analyze the game properly i just decided to vote for someone i don't mind not seeing tomorrow. My first choice would be D&A, butsince SOMEONE blackmailed me not to(You know who you are!) i will just go with this.
Explain the bits in red, please.In post 517, Charloux wrote:What misrepresentation? I never linked that statement to you!
Basically you are scumlean at worst ,but i have reasons not to vote for anybody else.-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
In post 586, JaeReed wrote:
I told him not to vote D&A. My read on her is equivalent to Innocent Child to me. I'd imagine that's what the blackmailed not to part was about, because I told him I want my strongest town read alive.In post 585, Chip Butty wrote:In post 515, Charloux wrote:I know i don't have the right to say this based on my activity but,why on earth are you guessing the game setup 12 hours before the deadline?!
If you can't decide who to lynch, then just go to random.org or something. The only ones who have a clue of the setup are PR's(If any) and scum. So i can only see scum gaining from mere speculations.
We have no claimed Seer, so lynching town delibaretly is a bad idea if you ask me.
VOTE: Karnos
Since i didn't even analyze the game properly i just decided to vote for someone i don't mind not seeing tomorrow. My first choice would be D&A, butsince SOMEONE blackmailed me not to(You know who you are!) i will just go with this.
Explain the bits in red, please.In post 517, Charloux wrote:What misrepresentation? I never linked that statement to you!
Basically you are scumlean at worst ,but i have reasons not to vote for anybody else.
The top bit is him saying deliberately lynching town is a bad idea. I agree. He misunderstood that we were looking for the 2nd scum rather than deliberately avoiding scum to avoid the venge on BTD if he was indeed the seer. (He's not the seer, though)
He has reasons not to vote for anybody else = townreads or claims. It all seems pretty straightforward to me aside from the blackmail comment. Which is directly correlated to our chat in our room.
First, Jae: I don't see why you felt a need to jump in here and answer on Charl's behalf.In post 590, Charloux wrote:@Jae: Although it's all correct, i don't want you to WK me again
@Charl: You've endorsed the content of Jae's answer on your behalf, but it remains unexplained why you say there is no claimed seer. Also, Jae's explanation does NOT explain the "blackmail" comment. Blackmail is where someone is saying "Do what I say, or I will do this bad thing to you". And can YOU please explain the "have reasons not to vote anybody else" bit? Do you mean you literally don't scumread anyone but karnos?-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
-
-
Chip Butty Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3943
- Joined: February 17, 2016
I can think of a couple reasons off the top of my head. (1) Not having a standard nightphase would be a dead giveaway that there are no PRs with night actions - this way, we have to figure it out; (2) Allows time for people to whisper at night.In post 615, karnos wrote: Why would we have a 48 hour night cycle if there is no night power roles? That one aspect of the game makes me second guess my initial thoughts, and I have to admit the existence of a seer is at least possible.
Also, there is this:Clue? Or just part of the fog surrounding parts of the setup?