[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8483108 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 659: Game Of Thrones S1E2 GAME OVER - Mafiascum.net
In post 17, SirCakez wrote:The lannisters would probably be the scum flavor from this episode though
For all intents and purposes they were the main villains of season 1
Radja doesn't necessarily play that game, though.
Sure, the Lannisters should have been scum. That's probably how I'd prefer it, but I was scum in episode one and I was a white walker.
White walkers were villains in episode 1 though.
The only other villain I could think of in episode 2 would be like viserys, but a 1-man scum team doesn't make sense
In post 59, Kraeg wrote:But still the flavor of the game is GoT, and it has got to have some impact on the alignment of each character. The Lannisters seem to be the hostile ones, at least in this episode, it's just fair to think that they would be scum. Saying that they aren't necessarily evil makes it look like you are planting an excuse to claim as town when a rolecop investigates you and finds out that you're a Lannister(assuming there's a role cop).
That'd be a flavor cop, not a role cop, but I do agree with your thinking here.
In post 67, Kraeg wrote:A handful of people have been discrediting the flavor discussions, and the more people discredit it, the more I think that there's something about the flavor that makes people not want to discuss it. Perhaps the flavor really points out certain things about the scum.
Again, I mostly agree with this. Flavor can be useful for claims at some point. Granted, if it never comes to that then it's useless discussion that just clutters the thread.
This "I agree with you!" crap looks like scum trying to post "content" without actually getting their hands dirty
- saying "this makes it look like you're scum" as opposed to "this makes me think you're scum" x2
- the arguments he uses I completely disagree with and find reachy
- vague shade net
- awkward phraseology
- possible that he knows lannisters are scum flavor
I'm saying "this makes it look like you're scum" because I'm trying to be objective. Saying "this makes me think you're scum" is subjective, and usually based on gut feeling and it's very easy for anyone to say what makes them think as scum.
You probably find it awkward because we're talking about the characters of the scum here, and it would be awkward for scum to read about people talking about them. I have my own reasoning why I think the lannisters are scum flavor, I didn't mentioned it out of the blue. Even if I knew beforehand that Lannisters are scum flavor, it's actually good for the town for me to be saying it, at least the town has an info they can use once people starts knowing each other's character. And why the hell would you even think that someone who thinks that lannisters are scum flavor is a scum? That doesn't make any sense. Seems like you just threw different negative comments just to paint me badly but not to justify why I am scum. Your reasoning for voting me is scummy.
Vote: Expedience
Ok this OMGUS was pretty terrible
I am concerned that Kraeg is just being lynchbait though, I've mislynched him before.
In post 96, Kraeg wrote:Then go ahead and lynch me. I'm pretty sure there's a scum in my wagon for me to be at L-1 this early. At least we can narrow the list the next day.
What are your current reads? Who on your wagon do you think is scum?
In post 97, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm still trying to narrow my list for today before we do any lynching
In post 78, SirCakez wrote:*snip*This "I agree with you!" crap looks like scum trying to post "content" without actually getting their hands dirty
VOTE: shaddowez
I agree, but I'm not so sure this is being done intentionally.
In post 96, Kraeg wrote:Then go ahead and lynch me. I'm pretty sure there's a scum in my wagon for me to be at L-1 this early. At least we can narrow the list the next day.
I find this post scummier than the posts that lead most to vote. I kind of want to vote you, but there's already a lot of votes off you and there's no reason to rush.
How would bad questions made to look like content be unintentional?
Yeah that post from Kraeg was scummy af
In post 107, SirCakez wrote:What are you hoping to get from these questions?
Scum generally need to make up reasons to scum read people. Considering Kraeg is saying he thinks there's scum on his wagon, it'd be interesting to see who he thinks it is and why. It can also help support associatives/distancing if he flips red.
As for GL, he hasn't really provided much this game, so similarly I'm trying to get content from him. Engaging people and getting information is the only way for us to root out the scum.
This answer was a lot better then expected, good reasoning behind both of those
In post 118, Kraeg wrote:I have no one in particular in mind who I think is a scum in my wagon. I'm just saying that I won't be surprised if at least one of the people in my wagon flips scum considering that it appears that I'm becoming a lynchbait here, and how convenient it is to point fingers at me due to the lack of people discussing and pointing fingers.
Meanwhile Kraeg is flinging shade at his wagon without actually contributing reads which is enough for me to think he's scum over lynchbait here
soo
In post 107, SirCakez wrote:What are you hoping to get from these questions?
Scum generally need to make up reasons to scum read people. Considering Kraeg is saying he thinks there's scum on his wagon, it'd be interesting to see who he thinks it is and why. It can also help support associatives/distancing if he flips red.
As for GL, he hasn't really provided much this game, so similarly I'm trying to get content from him. Engaging people and getting information is the only way for us to root out the scum.
This answer was a lot better then expected, good reasoning behind both of those
I don't think his answer was all that good, and it's strange to me that you took your foot off the gas here. Are you still scumreading shaddowez? If not then what exactly is in this post that scum!shaddowez could not have faked
No
He actually had reasoning to back up fluff I called him out on, it could have maybe been faked but I don't feel like it was
In post 107, SirCakez wrote:I wouldn't call asking a question and a random townread "things to discuss"
why not? Other players found things to discuss about them, but you pretended like I didn't make the posts until I called you out on it
Where? Aside from the answer to the said question.
And I ignored those posts because I didn't consider them real topics of discussion
well the person you are currently voting asked me about it in 61, and accused me of possible scum motivation behind it. If my early Wis townread is not a "real topic of discussion", then what do you make of Kraeg pushing me on it?
I think it's scum!Kraeg picking up on something random to try to nitpick with
No, this is already the third time you came in here promising to us that you'll post soon, and yet didn't. I'm already starting to think that this your way of "trying your best to play the game" - by promising to post soon which results into you not being able to give anything substantial in the game. There really isn't that many posts to read. You could have at least given us your general thoughts about the game or about some people here instead of just making a promise to post. I would be more inclined to think that his kind of play is a scum play.
did you miss gl asking me the same thing that you did? cos it looks like you are not paying particularly close I mean it is not like this game is bombarded with an inflation of posts so whats up?
GL's posts kind of blend together for me, so yeah I must have missed it
Post
Post #204 (isolation #19) » Thu Nov 10, 2016 11:15 am
Postby SirCakez »
In post 201, Wisdom wrote:so you want me to just leave mollie alone..? im trying to not be aggressive with her for this purpose
I mean I think this is going to be a stupid spammy argument that is going to put people off of getting involved in the game and I want to get Kraeg flipped
SirCakez wrote:
Her 180 on him would be scummy if he's town, if he's scum it's fine
That doesn't make sence. Mollie is only towny if she is right and scummy if she is not?
I don't think Mollie would bus via a 180, thus if Kraeg is scum then I think she's town
If Kraeg is town then her 180 looks super scummy for obvious reasons
Post
Post #245 (isolation #27) » Fri Nov 11, 2016 9:56 am
Postby SirCakez »
In post 236, ConvergentConclusion wrote:I don't think the Kreag wagon is useful anymore because Kraeg already replied to it and we already talked about it. A new wagon will create some better discussion.
This makes no sense
Do you think he's scum still or not?
Post
Post #268 (isolation #28) » Sat Nov 12, 2016 7:01 am
Postby SirCakez »
In post 258, GuiltyLion wrote:
Cakez's pivot on him was what I was trying to explore, because it looks to me like he felt like he needed an excuse to drop his push on shaddowez so he could hop on the Kraeg wagon
Well yeah the stuff Kraeg was posting was unbelievably scummy and Shaddowez had good reactions soooo the conclusion there is obvious for me
BBT I have 0 read on so I guess I'm fine with him going? The Kraeg wagon collapse is infuriating though.
In post 268, SirCakez wrote:Well yeah the stuff Kraeg was posting was unbelievably scummy and Shaddowez had good reactions soooo the conclusion there is obvious for me
If Kraeg is unbelievably scummy then why aren't you considering that he might be town?
By unbelievably scummy I didn't mean I literally couldn't believe he was scum ffs
It was a figure of speech for super scummy
Post
Post #300 (isolation #30) » Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:32 am
Postby SirCakez »
rb wrote:Cakez I barely registered so far, BBT in same boat (obv). BBT lynch is meh. It's likely a town slot and he may either show up to the party or we get a decent replace, I'd rather not kill it just now, I'd rather try kill scum.
Gotta go to work, adios.
What the heck
You barely registered BBT but you think it's a town slot? How does that add up?
In post 207, Wisdom wrote:then why is it wrong to try to sort mollie now if you're open to the possibility of her being scum?
My mollie read depends a lot on Kraeg's flip
Currently I lean town on her due to her reaction when you started pushing her
This is definitely lining up lynches. If you're town reading her based on what she's providing, why would just a town!Kraeg flip make you scum read her?
In post 217, SirCakez wrote:
I am lining up lynches, that's not a scumtell
Her 180 on him would be scummy if he's town, if he's scum it's fine
I wouldn't necessarily say it's a scum tell, but it definitely comes off as leading. What do you think about the argument between her and Wisdom about her "want to lynch you" quote?
-I've explained more then once, her flip on Kraeg is scummy if he's town but not scummy if he's scum
-I think it's dumb TvT, I said this earlier
Was hoping some votes would get BBT to at least think about posting, but obviously that didn't work.
VOTE: Cakez
Spent a lot of time early on in the back and forth with Expedience, but then sort of dropped it.
In post 107, SirCakez wrote:I am concerned that Kraeg is just being lynchbait though, I've mislynched him before.
This on top of 220 looks really ugly to me. Most of his other posts look shallow and/or easy to backpedal from. Examples: 204,206,280
This is super opportunistic
In post 297, pirate mollie wrote:what game did you play with kraeg? cos I did a meta dive on him and looked all 4 of his games (I was in 3 of them!) cos I wanted to chack which games we had together cos I knew there was a cple of them and you were in none of them. so why are you posturing a null read based on false meta?
Post
Post #301 (isolation #31) » Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:35 am
Postby SirCakez »
oh lmao I haven't played a game with Kraeg, I was thinking of ConManMick in Open 635 when I was talking about Kraeg earlier. Kraeg modded an Open I was in which is how I got confused.
Then my worries about him being mislynch bait are out the window (unless someone else has meta with him)
Post
Post #322 (isolation #34) » Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:54 pm
Postby SirCakez »
Yes I was worried kraeg might be mislynch bait, I remembered mislymching him before at the time before I realized my meta was someone else.
You're just throwing shitty shade like shadowez now
In post 322, SirCakez wrote:Yes I was worried kraeg might be mislynch bait, I remembered mislymching him before at the time before I realized my meta was someone else.
You're just throwing shitty shade like shadowez now
this actually gets better and better.
in the only game that kraeg has modded conmannick was not in it. also, super short game since smudger was the only townie who was lynched, scum was lynched d2, scum was vigged n2, and scum!titus was lynched d3.
do you wanna change your story again?
I didn't say CMM was in kraeg's game, I said I was in an open kraeg modded and there was a different open where I mislynched CMM and I got them mixed up somehow >.>
Post
Post #388 (isolation #50) » Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:21 pm
Postby SirCakez »
rb always feels like that (the personal grudge thing), it's NAI
Honestly I think kraeg might be town now
I would lynch in bbt/wis/kuroi tomorrow but I'm biased because I'm pissed at getting mislynched AGAIN