In post 91, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: not mafia
Fuck it, I want to wagon not mafia now.
In post 109, Raskolnikov wrote:N_M's been posting elsewhere onsite the whole time which to some extent just makes me want to say fuck him. Icon's statement there is also consistent with my skims and was mainly why I think icon might be paying attention, though from experience saying meta on people you've played isn't that difficult either when scum so eh.
In post 306, CheekyTeeky wrote:I don't get why you're acting like the game has to end now? We have more than a week left and Rask is speaking as if the day is about to end and we don't have time to scum hunt. This is even more ridiculous given that people have started moving their votes around a bit.
You're absolutely right, I want to see a flip soon.
Rask looks like eager town to me.
Why would eager town want an NM flip of all things? Who would've been his partner if you guys had hammered before I got here? Why would Rask expect NM to contribute and complain about it instead of pushing other slots that weren't OMGUS. Eager town = posturing imo.
In post 338, GreenLiquid wrote:The bit about defending Iconeum being scummy seems like it was tacked on to disguise this being an OMGUS vote. I don't get a sense of you having a strong scum read on him from your posting, certainly not strong enough to think that a player defending him is scummy.
I agree with this, was why I asked Bujaber that question about his read there. You think someone is scummy into voting someone else because they defend that scummy person seems like chainsaw, or something like that.
In post 362, BuJaber wrote:Icon works as a potential lynchee that is not one of you 3 but if icon is town then I lynch what could potentially be a strong townie. (He seems like scum at the moment though so I am inclined to join a wagon there but I might not start one)
In post 377, Lovebird wrote:Could be bored town. Fits with not wanting to wagon anyone who was being active.
So which is he? Eager town or bored town? I'll flip your question on you and ask why you're town reading him? I'd like to be proven wrong so I can sort other slots.
In post 383, Lovebird wrote:I was townreading him because seemed to be trying to sort people early, hadn't really seen anything that made me change my mind.
You'll be easily fooled by scum if you think this shallowly. What do you make of his OMGUS vote on ZZZX?
In post 383, Lovebird wrote:I was townreading him because seemed to be trying to sort people early, hadn't really seen anything that made me change my mind.
You'll be easily fooled by scum if you think this shallowly. What do you make of his OMGUS vote on ZZZX?
Idk, sometimes things just are like they seem. If it doesn't work out then I can rethink later. I'll look.
In post 79, ZZZX wrote:I can see a billion reasons to push that are legit, You picked the wrong one.
Did rask push inactivity as scum?
He is pretending to give content by doing that while he is just adding noise
In post 83, Raskolnikov wrote:I won't say it's content, but I also don't think it's noise. This game is objectively very slow and this is a lot less pages than usual by this time frame.
I think you might be defensive too as it feels like you're taking it as a direct scumread or shade on you but I don't feel like that's how it is.
In post 85, Raskolnikov wrote:I should bring up I like to POE and this kind of gamestate is not so has not been good for that.
I suspect through how most people are that 1 scum is uninvolved because I usually have more scumreads by now. I don't think this prediction is like bujabers though because I feel like this is based on (hopefully not inaccurate) reads and not whatever his was based on (I'm still not sure).
Anyone who has more than 1 or 2 solid reads at this stage is plain lying and talking bullshit or making up reads.
In post 387, Lovebird wrote:Okay, I see what you mean. Goes to not mafia as an easy push. Says he wants more content, but voting not mafia doesn't really accomplish that.
