Large Normal 216 - Endgame

[Flavor Leaf]

Correct that i believe Performer and I both don’t make it to D3. My trolling Not Mafia like playstyle isn’t holding up as well, so I’m only going to be night kill immune for so long

[Flavor Leaf]

I don’t think AP was going to be today’s lynch.

But he could be a town PR.

But I think I’d be okay pressuring AP here.

[profii]

Surely AP has gotta be pretty forthcoming if he is a PR - surely Performer just uses one of his powers on him again to check him

[Gamma Emerald]

I know I am townreading xx200

y?

I don't have much time, but I'm curious why people are all of a sudden voting me without saying why.

there was a case made on you, its p good.

I think the important thing is that you replaced into a scummy slot

y was my slot scummy?

On top of that, I was literally the IC, inexperience challenged, for both newbie games that Xx played in.

then why didn't he think that IC was inexperienced challenged then? What do you think of the case that Performer? put out on him?

Xx2k is probably town too for the IC comments. Pushing him as scum for it is pretty weak. Even as AP I expect better play than this.

Same question I asked Boon Leaf.

Nero feels self conscious here

[Nero Cain]

How is that any different than any other game where I ask ppl why they are misreading me?

Also, why didn't you answer the question that you were asked?

[Nero Cain]

Innocent child has been used multiple times. Even the exact phrase Flavor Leaf is innocent child.

So he's either clearly no engaged or reading or playing up his newbie card.

[Gamma Emerald]

How is that any different than any other game where I ask ppl why they are misreading me?

Also, why didn't you answer the question that you were asked?

Missed it as a question to me
I think a lot of the mistakes he’s making are one that would easily be rectified with scumbuddies
A lot of people share the read so why poke me?

[Nero Cain]

b/c yours wasn't explained and it was from befor RC and Leaf explained their town read.

[Gamma Emerald]

Well I mentioned it when I first formed the read

[xx2008]

I was kind of confused about what IC stood for, because IC stood for inexperience challenged in my newbie games. I remember hearing innocent child as IC even in a newbie game, but it wasn't mentioned that much and was probably only a joke that I didn't get.
It might be that I was also playing a recently-finished newbie game with fl as IC (as inexperience challenged), so I was mixing things up on accident.

[xx2008]

I looked at ap from the previous day, and even though it's hard to explain, his posts make me want to target him if I were an investigatting town PR. I just have a feeling that he is one fo those people who need a check on them to be certain about reads. Maybe the motion detector revealed another town PR investigating him?

[Completly Trustworthy]

Investigations or vig kills are usually the ways in which I think players like Saudade should be sorted, so I agree it is a waste a time to lynch him. Still, I think he is more likely town despite how nonproductive he's been this game due to the doubt he showed when voting Seph. If Seph is town, then he is more likely to be town as well in my opinion.

[Completly Trustworthy]

On the subject of the AP motion detector result, I believe Performer for now because he has nothing to gain from this as scum. Since we know of three town power roles already, its unlikely a town PR visited him in my opinion. Also, I do agree with some of the cases on him and am okay with pushing him.
VOTE: AP

[Completly Trustworthy]

Maxous, you said in 1103 that your read on RCE hinged on flips and you had a problem with his readlist. Have the recent flips changed your opinion of the slot at all?

[Completly Trustworthy]

I agree that XX being wrong about what IC means isn't that scummy. The scumteam almost certainly talked about Flavor Leaf during this game, so normally they wouldn't make a mistake like that. XX could have done it on purpose, but I don't think that's likely given what Flavor Leaf said. I'd say it's town-indicative.

[Garmr]

On the subject of the AP motion detector result, I believe Performer for now because he has nothing to gain from this as scum

. Since we know of three town power roles already, its unlikely a town PR visited him in my opinion.

Also, I do agree with some of the cases on him and am okay with pushing him.
VOTE: AP

While I agree that ap is scummy I think the bolded is wrong. As one town power role already targeted him (performer) and Dva had a scum read on him so I wouldn't be surprised if she visited him to. Also if say he is town it doesn't rule out the option scum may of visited him. I thought he was a cop yesterday so what's stopping scum from thinking the same.

That being said

But today he seems to have some knowledge of the scum thread as he knew scum have no pregame chat (unless they have day chat). When most mods allow pre game chat.

I think this is the best reason in my opinion to vote him at the moment.
VOTE: Ap

[AP]

I love it when people go "If there was motion on/from that slot they must be scum"! Motion Detector cannot even tell if I performed an action or one was performed on me (or both).

But sure, lynch me. The game is not fun and my role isn't fun either. I don't even know why it exists in the first place.

I mean, I do see the functionality from a mechanical PoV, but it tells

me

nothing, so I'm probably shooting blanks in all directions.

[Flavor Leaf]

Are you loyal vig? I love that as a role.

[profii]

I love it when people go "If there was motion on/from that slot they must be scum"! Motion Detector cannot even tell if I performed an action or one was performed on me (or both).

But sure, lynch me. The game is not fun and my role isn't fun either. I don't even know why it exists in the first place.

I mean, I do see the functionality from a mechanical PoV, but it tells

me

nothing, so I'm probably shooting blanks in all directions.

Surely now if you hard claim there is some chance your role can be verified via watcher etc which would make you town which would at least be useful

[Nosferatu]

Nos was because he was one of my earliest townreads in here & other people were tring him, so I thought scum might visit him somehow.

interesting choice lol

[Nosferatu]

I am only caught up to the early nos/seph interaction, which reads like scum theater to me. It started as an argument about bolding a name (uhhhh) and then turned into really shallow snipes at each other about who has more game forwarding content. Neither of them tried reading into motivations for the way each is posting.

kinda suspect nos/seph here
Scum theatre is some bold word wouldn't be surprise if he flash some tmi with one of them in that read

Based on nos scum meta, I don't recall scum not ever doing scum theater with his buddies...could be wrong though (garm you want to pipe in on that point?)

I did with alisae

they shot me d2/d3 and rode the game off of it

only time that happened to my recollection

[Nosferatu]

{AP, garmr, performer}
{seph, ofrhz, shat}
{rce}
{profii, lily, max}
{ct, xx}

not sorted:
saud
nero
gamma
ct

VOTE: AP

[Nosferatu]

see ya in another 46 hours o/

[RCEnigma]

Maxous, you said in 1103 that your read on RCE hinged on flips and you had a problem with his readlist. Have the recent flips changed your opinion of the slot at all?

To be fair the only slot from that list I still think could be scum is Sephiroth. Shattiels grown on me, maxous too. Probably just masons as claimed. *Disclaimer /s about the masons*

[Not Known 15]

Vote Count 2.2

xx2008(0):

Performer(0):

Carcalilly(0):

Maxous(1):ofrhz;

Garmr(0):

Saudade

Inferno390

(0):

Nero Cain

Creature

Shortaru

(1):profii;

Sephiroth(0):

Nosferatu(0):

Gamma Emerald

FA_Q2

(0):

AP(5):Maxous;Carcalilly;Completely Trustworthy;Garmr;Nosferatu;

Shattiel

DS

(0):

Completly Trustworthy(0):

Flavor Leaf(0)

:

profii(0):

RCEnigma(0):

ofrhz(0):

NoLynch(0):

Not Voting(10):Saudade;Nero Cain;RCEnigma;Shattiel;xx2008;Sephiroth;Gamma Emerald;AP;

Flavor Leaf

;Performer;

With 17 alive it is 9 to lynch.

Day 2 will end in (expired on 2018-11-22 16:00:00) or when a lynch is achieved.