Large Normal 216 - Endgame
-
-
Shattiel Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 969
- Joined: January 1, 2018
-
-
Saudade Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: February 12, 2018
-
-
xx2008 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 337
- Joined: August 29, 2018
-
-
Flavor Leaf Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 42893
- Joined: July 17, 2017
- Location: San Francisco
Ap could be doing this as well, though.In post 2477, xx2008 wrote:Am I the only one who believes rcenigma is faking JOAT and is scum?CHECK OUT MY HOW TO PLAY AS SCUM GUIDE Maybe it'll help you catch me
”Yeah, the moment I realized Flavor was scum I stopped trying because I’m sure as hell not beating him.” - Clemency
”Not bragging about myself as much as I'm actually praising the Scum player of the year...and probably the decade.” - Almost50
"Just accept that FL is too good as scum, period." - Clidd-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
A DISloyal RB sounds a bit farfetched to be honest especially with a rolebloicker flip I would expect Ap to mirror the roleblocker that already flipped with the current duoality flips. So they are on my lynch list.In post 2468, Flavor Leaf wrote:
Same. Are you thinking AP is likely town, or possible scum?In post 2467, Garmr wrote:
My gut says sausade is townIn post 2465, Shattiel wrote:Have others actually done anything to prove they're town @garmr
Except FL ofc-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
It's possible but improbable IMHOIn post 2477, xx2008 wrote:Am I the only one who believes rcenigma is faking JOAT and is scum?YEAH BABY YEAH!
Oh, behave-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
I'm not a JOAT thoughIn post 2478, Flavor Leaf wrote:
Ap could be doing this as well, though.In post 2477, xx2008 wrote:Am I the only one who believes rcenigma is faking JOAT and is scum?YEAH BABY YEAH!
Oh, behave-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
In post 2479, Garmr wrote:
A DISloyal RB sounds a bit farfetched to be honest especially with a rolebloicker flip I would expect Ap to mirror the roleblocker that already flipped with the current duoality flips. So they are on my lynch list.In post 2468, Flavor Leaf wrote:
Same. Are you thinking AP is likely town, or possible scum?In post 2467, Garmr wrote:
My gut says sausade is townIn post 2465, Shattiel wrote:Have others actually done anything to prove they're town @garmr
Except FL ofc
What flipped RB?YEAH BABY YEAH!
Oh, behave-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
DVa she was a roleblocker right?In post 2482, AP wrote:In post 2479, Garmr wrote:
A DISloyal RB sounds a bit farfetched to be honest especially with a rolebloicker flip I would expect Ap to mirror the roleblocker that already flipped with the current duoality flips. So they are on my lynch list.In post 2468, Flavor Leaf wrote:
Same. Are you thinking AP is likely town, or possible scum?In post 2467, Garmr wrote:
My gut says sausade is townIn post 2465, Shattiel wrote:Have others actually done anything to prove they're town @garmr
Except FL ofc
What flipped RB?-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
Rolestopper
A Rolestopper is a role that can target a player to stop all other Night actions from affecting them in any way. This is something like the inverse of a Roleblocker. A Rolestopper effectively turns their target into an Ascetic Bulletproof for that night.YEAH BABY YEAH!
Oh, behave-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
In other words, it's a +ve utility only if it stops a kill on Town, but otherwise it's a -ve utility preventing kills on scum as well as investigation on anyone.
Like, assuming the most likely scenario (Gamma was on Nero and scum shot Gamma), if DVa was alive and was on Nero last night she would have stopped Gamma's action on him and thus Nero would have lived and Gamma would have still died.YEAH BABY YEAH!
Oh, behave-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
Why didn't you vote Flubber here?In post 945, Shattiel wrote:
You called out that the "town play" in MS continues to descend.. which means you're referring to someone who you townread?In post 943, Flubbernugget wrote:I dont think I ever said I had a read on either (though garmr comes off as gut town and I do find CT scummy as of recent)
So I have no clue why you're asking that question, what you expect it to accomplish, or how it's related to any of the dumbness surrounding your Mason "gambit"
I asked for clarification cause it's smells tmi and wolf fur-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
Why did you target RCE?In post 2456, AP wrote:
Maxous, Garmr, You.In post 2437, RCEnigma wrote:AP what were your targets in order?-
-
Not Known 15 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3748
- Joined: September 15, 2017
-
-
Almost50 Monkey Business
- Monkey Business
- Monkey Business
- Posts: 27276
- Joined: November 13, 2015
- Location: Right here.
I'm starting to get a bit paranoid at you. It's not your norm to be this disengaged and come to throw some meaningless questions around then disappear again.In post 2488, ofrhz wrote:
Why did you target RCE?In post 2456, AP wrote:
Maxous, Garmr, You.In post 2437, RCEnigma wrote:AP what were your targets in order?
Where did the last session of questions lead you?
As for this one it was implicitly answered already (which means your skimming). I wanted to verify him once an for all, thinking he had a verifiable action. If he did and it went through it would have confirmed him 100% to me.
Modded 2 Opens & 2 Large Themed games successfully.-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
In post 2490, Almost50 wrote:
I'm starting to get a bit paranoid at you. It's not your norm to be this disengaged and come to throw some meaningless questions around then disappear again.In post 2488, ofrhz wrote:
Why did you target RCE?In post 2456, AP wrote:
Maxous, Garmr, You.In post 2437, RCEnigma wrote:AP what were your targets in order?
Where did the last session of questions lead you?
As for this one it was implicitly answered already (which means your skimming). I wanted to verify him once an for all, thinking he had a verifiable action. If he did and it went through it would have confirmed him 100% to me.YEAH BABY YEAH!
Oh, behave-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
None of your actions are verifiable at this point and your crumb wasn't really a crumb now that i look at it:In post 2491, AP wrote: I'm starting to get a bit paranoid at you. It's not your norm to be this disengaged and come to throw some meaningless questions around then disappear again.
Where did the last session of questions lead you?In post 848, AP wrote:@FL: I get that. I got it the first time too. Problem is [redacted][redacted][reacted] so I hope you'll excuse me if I don't fully trust your read. Not that I have a "strong" read on Maxous anyway, but he's not in my lynch pool for D1, so it would take me more than just your word of honour to sheep you there.
if this was your only crumb, I don't think anyone could've picked up on the fact that you RB'd max N1 based on this post alone.In post 1697, AP wrote:Yes, and it's quite a coincidence you came into D2 tunneling me in particular. It's also quite a coincidence I provided a quote from my D1 posts where I decided I would target you in specific and crumbed it while I was addressing the IC.
and my primary reason for townreading you, which was that Flubber calling you out made you more likely to be town, kind of no longer holds true because he did the same thing with the random shading that went nowhere with Creature-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
I guess this question didn't lead to anything because it looks like you've only rolled VT as town on APIn post 2459, AP wrote:
I only crumb as A50.In post 2457, ofrhz wrote:AP why didn’t you crumb your role? Can you point out instances where you were a TPR and didn’t crumb this?-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
In post 730, AP wrote:
Did Max confirm? It would be easy for a Cop to verify TWO slots if that was the case. I don't think faking Masons is a large is at all a good idea, so I'm tentatively removing Max from my D1 lynch pool.In post 638, Shattiel wrote:Max and I are actually masons
Also it looks like you took Max out of your lynchpool at this point because Shattiel fakeclaimed Mason with him (and by your logic, that made Maxous more likely to be town).In post 734, AP wrote:That lasted for what? 4 hours?? You're back in my lynch pool.
Hint: Max is not though. If you flip scum you were most likely faking a Mason with TOWN. (Oh, keep your mouth shut, FL).
But you claimed that you removed Max from your lynchpool around 848 because you intended to RB them?In post 1671, AP wrote:
^^ See? I wasn't sure (and I was also teasing FL about his shitty play in another game that has now ended). THIS is the point where I decided I'd go for Max rather than Shattiel.In post 848, AP wrote:@FL: I get that. I got it the first time too. Problem is [redacted][redacted][reacted] so I hope you'll excuse me if I don't fully trust your read. Not that I have a "strong" read on Maxous anyway, but he's not in my lynch pool for D1, so it would take me more than just your word of honour to sheep you there.-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
VOTE: ofrhzIn post 2492, ofrhz wrote:But RCE never said what his third action was. I don't understand why you thought his action was verifiable and then would try to rb someone you were TR'ing?
If you really wanted to verify RCE's claikm, you could've done it n2 but instead decided to go for Garmr
The ofrhz I know certainly knows how to read.
Let me tell you what RCE said about his last night action:
Then your huge multi-quote post 2495 proved you're not even reading for comprehension, but rather to try and find some contradiction to push that you failed to see the bolded:In post 2381, RCEnigma wrote:I used my protection last night, was I your target?
Did Shattiel flip yet? Did she flip before and get reinstalled into the game perhaps??In post 734, AP wrote:That lasted for what? 4 hours?? You're back in my lynch pool.
Hint: Max is not though.you were most likely faking a Mason with TOWN. (Oh, keep your mouth shut, FL).If you flip scumYEAH BABY YEAH!
Oh, behave-
-
AP Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: April 2, 2018
-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
RCE said his last night action was a protective one in the beginning of this dayphase though. You couldn't have known that his night action was a protectiveIn post 2496, AP wrote:
VOTE: ofrhzIn post 2492, ofrhz wrote:But RCE never said what his third action was. I don't understand why you thought his action was verifiable and then would try to rb someone you were TR'ing?
If you really wanted to verify RCE's claikm, you could've done it n2 but instead decided to go for Garmr
The ofrhz I know certainly knows how to read.
Let me tell you what RCE said about his last night action:
In post 2381, RCEnigma wrote:I used my protection last night, was I your target?at the time you decided to RB him last night.
I could've been clearer when I said "RCE never said what his third action was," but my point was that last night, you tried to RB someone whose role you weren't sure you could confirm in an attempt to confirm them? I don't understand the logic behind that, especially since RCE was someone you were townreading since halfway through D1 I believe.-
-
ofrhz Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 5944
- Joined: March 16, 2018
You clearly said you were taking Max out of the lynchpool here. And the sentences that followed implied you did so because of the mason fakeclaim.Then your huge multi-quote post 2495 proved you're not even reading for comprehension, but rather to try and find some contradiction to push that you failed to see the bolded:
Did Shattiel flip yet? Did she flip before and get reinstalled into the game perhaps??In post 734, AP wrote:That lasted for what? 4 hours??
You're back in my lynch pool.
Hint:Max is not though.If you flip scum you were most likely faking a Mason with TOWN. (Oh, keep your mouth shut, FL).
And I still don't see how this was a crumb or indicated that you were taking Max out of the lynchpool because you decided to target them.In post 848, AP wrote:@FL: I get that. I got it the first time too. Problem is [redacted][redacted][reacted] so I hope you'll excuse me if I don't fully trust your read. Not that I have a "strong" read on Maxous anyway, but he's not in my lynch pool for D1, so it would take me more than just your word of honour to sheep you there.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.