Effectively isn't actually masons.In post 699, Rabbi Vole wrote:Vedith we're effectively masons.
Either you are confident 100% that Pignash is town or you're not.
Effectively isn't actually masons.In post 699, Rabbi Vole wrote:Vedith we're effectively masons.
But for my role to make sense Rabbi absolutely has to be town.In post 700, Vedith wrote:Effectively isn't actually masons.In post 699, Rabbi Vole wrote:Vedith we're effectively masons.
Either you are confident 100% that Pignash is town or you're not.
Still, most likely town and not worth to worry about it rn.In post 691, RCEnigma wrote:Hmm, the Mason claim doesn't confirm rabbi as town, it only confirms that he and pignash's are the same alignment.
Dunno, who was towncasing Lich again?In post 692, rosterfoster wrote:How can you read TL's posts and not think he's scum?
In post 676, DoubtingThomas wrote:this is the second? or third? person saying they don't understand lich vote.In post 656, teacher wrote:EBWOP
Can someone take the time to do an actual lich case? I just dont see it. And I dont want the one sentence tunnels, but tell me a specific post that shows scum motivation? All I remember is the early claim shenanigans and it picking up steam way to easy. I think Lich's response to the claims was organic, if silly, and I can see his own mentality thoughout.
I am feeling very uninspired by this gamestate. After re-ISOing, I am still happy with my townblock, but nullreading way too many slots for a pagecount in the 20s. I am off rabbi and pignash for the time being, so willing to pressure another slot I havent felt much on. VOTE: Roster
i've learned from a good town player that people who come into the thread and ask why the top wagon is being wagoned means scums tmi'ing a town top wagon and hoping to make themselves look townier once the town wagoned player flips.
VOTE: teacher
lol
I hate you, but you're a town leanIn post 713, DoubtingThomas wrote:a50 whats your read on me
What do you think about this post? How does it affect your read on volxen?In post 646, volxen wrote:So what's the point of starting a wagon on someone who is not even here to respond to the wagon against him? And if you really are wanting to start a wagon against him, why wait for Vedith to vote for him before placing your own vote?In post 513, Almost50 wrote:I say he needs to post more and he declares VLA.
Anyone up for a wagon here? I don't want to start a vanity wagon, but if I can find 2-3 others willing to make this a competing wagon I'm all for it.
And like DT brought up in this post:
Your transitions don't really make sense since they were never explained. First you voted for DT and made a case against him, at one point going so far as to agree with DT when he said that either you or him should be the day one lynch (see: post 161). Then you voted for Demonlord (Rabbi Vole) (see: post 303), and now you want to wagon Pignash. Why did you abandon your original push against DT?In post 561, DoubtingThomas wrote:Spoiler:
A50 makes a big ass case on me, clashes with me a little bit, then a day laterNEVER REVISITSthe read on me
I scraped all his posts. He never even mentions me, but actively tries to start a wagon on low hanging frits, who are not posting and are not ready to actively defend themselves like demonlord and when the sub comes in, retreats to pignash.
Doesn't look like his scum read on me is real. Doesn't look like he is trying to really find scums. He's trying to defend Lich by shading people's scum read on him.
@Almost50, can you explain your town read of Lich?