Mini Theme 2083 - Vengeful Ghosts Endgame

[Arkham Asylum]

—

Skip to Next Vote Count

—

---

I don't really know if claiming today was mechanically optimal but I figure it's not the worst case at least to get some information out there considering flipless

Well we know now that DEB was lockscum, since his claim was complete bs.

~HQ

[Chemist1422]

UNVOTE: AA

noted

[Flavor Leaf]

Nah, DEB 100% doesn’t fake that claim.

He could be that as scum, sure, but it wasn’t fake.

[Chemist1422]

Nah, DEB 100% doesn’t fake that claim.

He could be that as scum, sure, but it wasn’t fake.

Are you saying the doc claim is fake?

[Flavor Leaf]

What doc claim.

I only remember the enabler claim

[Flavor Leaf]

And I’m specifically stating that it wasn’t fake, regardless of alignment, that was real

[Chemist1422]

okay

I'm the doctor, as far as I know my action went through last night

I targeted AA, and I assume that's why there were no kills

thus, a soft innocent on AA and a soft guilty on DEB

another explanation is that scum no killed specifically to draw these kinds of assumptions but that seems highly unlikely

[Flavor Leaf]

Might not be fake that Dan is a doctor, but i still believe DEB does not make that up.

That actually leans Credit towards AA scum, tbh.

If DEB isn’t actually an Enabler, then someone coached him into saying that.

[Flavor Leaf]

AA is gambiting is my best bet

[Chemist1422]

AA is gambiting is my best bet

How exactly

Also I had a thought that Ghost!DEB might have stopped the kill somehow

[Flavor Leaf]

AA was bringing up the fact that they’re the most likely to die right?

That’s setting up this gambit, Dan could be a part of it.

However, by no killing there it makes it seem like the doctor still can protect.

VOTE: AA

This isn’t town

[Flavor Leaf]

I can soul read DEB; I’m not wrong.

[Arkham Asylum]

You didn't actually roll scum 5 times simultaneously did you boon?

-Kat

[Arkham Asylum]

AA was bringing up the fact that they’re the most likely to die right?

That’s setting up this gambit, Dan could be a part of it.

However, by no killing there it makes it seem like the doctor still can protect.

VOTE: AA

This isn’t town

LOL

WHAT?

~ Poison Ivy

[Flavor Leaf]

You didn't actually roll scum 5 times simultaneously did you boon?

-Kat

To be fair, before I was saying 4 times simultaneously, I was saying 3, but alas, 4 was all.

[Arkham Asylum]

The problem is I just modded you trying to argue that the traitor in animu was recruited night 3 or whatever instead of night 1 so you making completely nonsensical inferences about night actions does kinda read as scummy to me now, but I've kinda liked you for town since RVS so I don't like this feeling about you right now. There's no reason to think that we would gambit with a no kill night 1 when even if a doc is real that might not be the town's protective structure; instead it's just as likely to think there would be a roleblocker or a jailkeeper. The "doc enabler" doesn't do much since the game is flipless, and in any case if you think scum no kill to bait a doc save claim n1 from a rando... just no, dude. Either you think we're scum with Dann or you evaluate your read of us without that in mind. But the amount of bad logical leaps required for you to go down that little rabbit hole just really damaged my read of you lol

-Kat

[Binary Star]

You didn't actually roll scum 5 times simultaneously did you boon?

-Kat

To be fair, before I was saying 4 times simultaneously, I was saying 3, but alas, 4 was all.

I believe this. I had a period where I was scum in multiple games simultaneously, it was rough. He's talking like a guy who's been freed from his scum prison.

Y

[Arkham Asylum]

Now that Dann claimed for basically no reason given we weren't under pressure and he wasn't under pressure is kinda ??? but given the game is flipless I guess I can see a world he would want to claim a soft inno even if it means he probably dies tonight

-Kat

[Flavor Leaf]

The problem is I just modded you trying to argue that the traitor in animu was recruited night 3 or whatever instead of night 1 so you making completely nonsensical inferences about night actions does kinda read as scummy to me now, but I've kinda liked you for town since RVS so I don't like this feeling about you right now. There's no reason to think that we would gambit with a no kill night 1 when even if a doc is real that might not be the town's protective structure; instead it's just as likely to think there would be a roleblocker or a jailkeeper. The "doc enabler" doesn't do much since the game is flipless, and in any case if you think scum no kill to bait a doc save claim n1 from a rando... just no, dude. Either you think we're scum with Dann or you evaluate your read of us without that in mind. But the amount of bad logical leaps required for you to go down that little rabbit hole just really damaged my read of you lol

-Kat

Aight. Let’s mass claim then.

I’ll start. No surprises in this flipless game then.

[Flavor Leaf]

I’m V. T.

[jjh927]

lol fuck this

VOTE: Flavor Leaf

[jjh927]

-Believes a doctor enabler claim that got lynched
-Thinks we should massclaim day 2

I'd maybe give you either of those things in isolation, but not together, because their combination means you think we should out all the PRs when there's no protection for PRs

[Flavor Leaf]

I mean, sure, but why do I do that so bluntly?

I do believe that doctor enabler claim.

DEB does not make that up. End of story, no arguments about it. He could have had scum coach him, or he could be legit scum doc enabler, but saying he comes up with it on his own isn’t a thing

[Flavor Leaf]

Sorry, I’m just town here. This is a flipless game.

And I don’t claim VT first as scum.

[Flavor Leaf]

Nor do i claim first