yea
has your other hydra head looked at the game yet?
yea
Yeh she has
Talk me through this homeboiIn post 124, ponchomonkey wrote:I'm wondering if there's any benefit to getting everyone who voted Arcfield to claim and then having everyone else come out with their votes afterward
gonna be real wit u chief i feel like thats a horrible ideaIn post 124, ponchomonkey wrote:I'm wondering if there's any benefit to getting everyone who voted Arcfield to claim and then having everyone else come out with their votes afterward
Also stop trying to take control of thingsIn post 117, Cojones Kickers wrote:I think the way to go here is strange brew followed by dunn
We should finish claiming out tho, byt strange brew should be next not voyc
-M
I’m an awkward kinda guy chumIn post 122, Omochao wrote:I found it awkward and lamistIn post 119, Elastic Plastic wrote:CK had a pretty townie iso imo, I agreed with their Arc vote at the time and I liked their initiative for town.
Yeh bc you’re definitely not trying to do that in a way that benefits the person who has done the objectively scummiest thing in the gameIn post 133, Dunnstral wrote:Also stop trying to take control of thingsIn post 117, Cojones Kickers wrote:I think the way to go here is strange brew followed by dunn
We should finish claiming out tho, byt strange brew should be next not voyc
-M
Voyc should claim next
Why?In post 131, Omochao wrote:gonna be real wit u chief i feel like thats a horrible ideaIn post 124, ponchomonkey wrote:I'm wondering if there's any benefit to getting everyone who voted Arcfield to claim and then having everyone else come out with their votes afterward
Could you expand on what you're seeing that seems scum-motivated?In post 142, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Cojones Kickers
Everything you're pushing/shading today seems scum-motivated
Your thought process for me being scum with rx Strange brew is VERY shallow too and I don't like that you keep pushing that
I think that this is a wolfy pop-in.
You agree with Omochao's thoughts on CK?
More of their buddying attempts from d1 and their flailing that is going on now.In post 145, Voyc wrote:I like Elastic for now, good vibes
@Dunn, why'd you want me to claim first?
You agree with Omochao's thoughts on CK?
Needed more content from you and you lightly pinged me with what you hadIn post 145, Voyc wrote:@Dunn, why'd you want me to claim first?
He came into today saying Strange brew is scum, when I pointed out that they'd go through a voting phase where they couldn't defend themself he ignored that and kept pushing.In post 143, Elastic Plastic wrote:Could you expand on what you're seeing that seems scum-motivated?In post 142, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: Cojones Kickers
Everything you're pushing/shading today seems scum-motivated
Your thought process for me being scum with rx Strange brew is VERY shallow too and I don't like that you keep pushing that
In post 114, Cojones Kickers wrote:Or better explanation he knew that hammering would bring us into a low info voting stage where the odds of a mislynch were still good, probs partly counting on your shitty logic that seems to be prevalent onsite that if someone does something objectively antitown that’s blatant then it’s too obvious for it to be scum so it should be forgivenIn post 112, Dunnstral wrote:Also your argument for strange brew being scum still doesn't acknowledge that there was a voting phase ehere he couldn't slip out of anything, which I talked about on the last page
Not a good luck when you're ignoring info to keep pushing instead of reassesing
I mean you realise that’s exactly what scum rely on to play antitown moves right
Did u just like not read this when you said I ignored your thing about the voting stageIn post 115, Cojones Kickers wrote:Also even if it was to get him killed it would give two dead town to one scum with v little info, aka a gamestate primed for manipulation which still benefits scum