In post 129, Doctor Drew wrote:Your 106 was calling someone out for making a overly wordy post which is partially why you voted Billy, but then at the end of the post you say it is probably an over eager newbie, essentially confirming what I said about it being NAI.
You called somewhat out for something you even admit isn't scummy.
In 117, calling someone out for missing a post always reeks of me of scum just throwing shade left and right hoping that other people hop on and get the wagon going.
Also, the only person I ISO'ed was Nitro on D1. My vote on you is all based on your actions today. Hardly call that tunneling.
Okay? So how is changing my mind about a post making someone look bad? The first time I read Billy's post it felt like someone trying too hard to make a lengthy town post, but their posts thereafter convinced me that that's just what their posting style is like. I did not confirm anything you said, I changed my mind on my own.
And no one was even on a wagon for MariaR. I had a reason for asking MariaR that specific question.
And I pointed out that the only thing in
your ISO
, not Nitro's or anyone else's, is your throwing shade at me for flimsy reasons and directing other people to find me scummy, including taking the time out of your day to quote Dunn's post from day 1. Not only that, the select way you were cherrypicking my posts feels exactly like scum fishing for a mislynch.
Call me whatever you want...