Would it be helpful to have a "NEIN until X is president" option (probably a unanimous vote), or is it preferable to go through the steps of having people nominate their Chancellors and voting, even if the plan is to reject it?
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
In post 106, dweller wrote:Also if we are going with the meta that Oka pointed out then I think 37 is a good choice. because everyone deserves a chance at least for first deck
Thats not what he said though, if we passed liberal policies on 15 and 26, then we go to 51 and 62 to have the least amount of people touching the deck as possible.
Im voting no until it gets to NMSA.
Anyone doing different will be in conflict with a clear liberal agenda.
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
As it stands 4 people have touched cards and 2 lib policies passed. 3 players are facist and 3 people havent touched the deck, why would you want to put the power in the hands of people that have a higher probablity of being Facist
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
In post 103, Formerfish wrote:Shouldn't Oka be picking me since I already passed a lib policy?
I think for maximum info we should give everyone a chance to come in government. after that we should decide based on our judgements.
Thats not even what Oka suggested though, he suggested we keep it in 2 pairs if both passed lib policies. I dont even know why you are bringing this up since you were part of one pair, unless you are Fascist and cant keep doing that forever.
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
What more info do you need than we have 4 people who all passed a lib policy and we have a way to keep the government in their hands so that we can win the game?
Do you not want to pass lib policies and win the game?
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
if 15 succeeds in getting a lib policy the next set is usually 26
if 26 succeeds then you have two lib pairing governments for the moment
you veto until seat 5 is president and seat 5 nominates 1 again, then seat 6 nominates 2 and you run these two governments back and forth until someone fails
altermatively if 26 fails then you go to 51 again and then after that you play 73 or 74 (you don't want to play either 2 or 6 here because they could have double dropped lib cards so you lock them out, and you need to find a winning triangle)
now for more interesting scenarios
if 15 fails and 26 fails then it becomes interesting because 2 has an investigate and usually you should investigate your own chancellor and then theory breaks down a bit on optimal choices of whether 37 or 47 or 6 should play but hopefully we dont reach that
but like meta is more of a guide
and since we are on a mafia site
we can use this as a guideline rather than a strict playbook (this is probably my least favorite part of secret hitler site, they only play meta and even if you scumread people and it can get throwy)
pedit: yes that would be the goal of finding a lib triangle, you leash it down so you have a good poe pool to find who is to blame if things fuck up
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
Would it be helpful to have a "NEIN until X is president" option (probably a unanimous vote), or is it preferable to go through the steps of having people nominate their Chancellors and voting, even if the plan is to reject it?
"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC
"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC
In post 61, Vex Vience wrote:i was gonna post most of what oka said earlier but i was asleep.
also, 15 26 is the only thing ill currently ja. tho, i do want them to both red so i can play
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"I preach darkness. I don't inspire hope—only shadows. It's up to you to find the light in my words." ~ Charles Lee
"The cosmos is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be." ~ Carl Sagan
