Mini Theme 2105: Assassins Mafia (Game Over!)

bitbringer · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:53 pm

In post 448, bitbringer wrote:
In post 446, Definitely Not Scum wrote:Who are your scum buddies, bitbringer?

Is it Pops? We have been thinking her read on NaCL is pretty trash for a while now.

Speaking of... @unwnd, why are you scumreading NaCL?
pops is my scum buddy but don't tell anyone

also Dunn is my scum buddy too, i'm just busing him

-bit

my teammate is a worthless gamethrower. Pls ban him.

bitbringer · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:54 pm

suck deez nutz

Definitely Not Scum · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:54 pm

In post 448, bitbringer wrote:
In post 446, Definitely Not Scum wrote:Who are your scum buddies, bitbringer?

Is it Pops? We have been thinking her read on NaCL is pretty trash for a while now.

Speaking of... @unwnd, why are you scumreading NaCL?
pops is my scum buddy but don't tell anyone

also Dunn is my scum buddy too, i'm just busing him

-bit

Dang you crumbled fast. Rough start for your team.

- OS

bitbringer · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:54 pm

In post 449, Definitely Not Scum wrote:If you agree with the opinion, why does that make it a scum opinion? That... doesn't seem to make sense if you're town.

- OS

town and scum can have the same opinions on posts.

bitbringer · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:55 pm

How the fuck does GIF and pops have the most posts? GIF has been busy IRL and pops is just pops.

-bit

bitbringer · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:55 pm

Oh good, we're voting Dunnstral. I expected more from him after Guns and Roses.

-bit

Definitely Not Scum · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:58 pm

I find it interesting that opinions you mostly agree with mean those people are not town.
Is that a subtle projection of your alignment?

- OS

bitbringer · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:59 pm

In post 456, Definitely Not Scum wrote:I find it interesting that opinions you mostly agree with mean those people are not town.
Is that a subtle projection of your alignment?

- OS

where in the fuck are u getting this from?

tris · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:59 pm

In post 406, NaCl wrote:
In post 403, tris wrote:@bitbringer could you explain your townread on me more?
Tris, why does it feel like you don't want to be townread? Are you 3rd party?

sorry, i keep postponing putting effort into this game

Regarding the bitbringer wagon, could someone explain what they see there? To me, it seems like bitbringer has done a lot not really saying much, although I don't see anything that super jumps out as scummy.

in my case, i don't like the way he's townreading me.

but, that's apparently not the head who's here right now.

actually

bitbringer · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:01 pm

In post 458, tris wrote:in my case, i don't like the way he's townreading me.

i don't like my other head either.

bitbringer · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:02 pm

HIS CONSTANT CALLING OUT OF OUR WHOLE TEAM. IS RUINING MY WHOLE MASTER GAME PLAN AND IT ANNOYS ME.

BITMAP GET BACK IN THE BOX!

Definitely Not Scum · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:02 pm

In post 457, bitbringer wrote:
In post 456, Definitely Not Scum wrote:I find it interesting that opinions you mostly agree with mean those people are not town.
Is that a subtle projection of your alignment?

- OS
where in the fuck are u getting this from?

You told Dunnstral that you haven't done anything townie, but you are now calling him scum for voting you based on reading your posts as not being very townie. That seems contradictory.

You agree with Volxen's opinion that LA is not obvtown, but it is apparently not a town opinion despite you also coming to that opinion. If you're town, that seems contradictory.

- OS

Dunnstral · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:03 pm

I ask you why I shouldn't be scumreading you

You say that you're not saying I shouldn't be scumreading you

That means you're saying my scumread on you is fine

Definitely Not Scum · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:03 pm

In post 458, tris wrote:in my case, i don't like the way he's townreading me. but, that's apparently not the head who's here right now.actually

Who were you responding to in this quote? That quote you quoted seems to be very buddy-that-needs-a-way-onto-the-wagon-esque.

- OS

Dunnstral · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:04 pm

In post 455, bitbringer wrote:Oh good, we're voting Dunnstral. I expected more from him after Guns and Roses.

-bit

I didn't do anything in guns and roses

bitbringer · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:04 pm

In post 461, Definitely Not Scum wrote:You told Dunnstral that you haven't done anything townie, but you are now calling him scum for voting you based on reading your posts as not being very townie. That seems contradictory.

You agree with Volxen's opinion that LA is not obvtown, but it is apparently not a town opinion despite you also coming to that opinion. If you're town, that seems contradictory.

- OS

None of that contradicts if you pay attention to what I said and I really don't feel like I should need to explain this because even in this own post this contradicts what you just said to me that I am townreading people based solely on their opinions agreeing with me which you didn't fucking demonstrate in this very post.

I am not scumreading dunny for thinking I am scum. I don't believe his scumread on me.

I don't think volx opinion on that post was town or scum so I am not giving it town points.

None of this equals me scumreading or townreading people on their opinions. I am trying ot figure out if I think they are genuine opinions and only if I believe that it will give me hints on alignment.

Dunnstral · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:06 pm

In post 464, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 455, bitbringer wrote:Oh good, we're voting Dunnstral. I expected more from him after Guns and Roses.

-bit
I didn't do anything in guns and roses

viewtopic.php?f=56&t=80359&user_select[]=27717

Definitely Not Scum · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:06 pm

In post 465, bitbringer wrote:None of that contradicts if you pay attention to what I said and I really don't feel like I should need to explain this because even in this own post this contradicts what
you just said to me that I am townreading people based solely on their opinions agreeing with me
which you didn't fucking demonstrate in this very post.

Is the bolded at typo? I never said you were townreading people based on their opinions agreeing with you. I said something very different.

I said you are scumreading people despite their opinions agreeing with your opinions.

- OS

Dunnstral · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:07 pm

I literally posted 11 times before dying in Guns and Roses

And bit "expects more from me" after that game

Now that's a real fake read

bitbringer · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:08 pm

In post 462, Dunnstral wrote:I ask you why I shouldn't be scumreading you

You say that you're not saying I shouldn't be scumreading you

That means you're saying my scumread on you is fine

Do we need to make a argument diagram for their to be no miscommunication or something? Cause you are ignoring my main point in favor ur point in what is really i think disingenious.

In the large scheme of things I am saying theres nothing wrong with a scumread on me

if I believe it is genuine.

You haven't shown that and are continually not showing sorting.

bitbringer · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:08 pm

In post 467, Definitely Not Scum wrote:
In post 465, bitbringer wrote:None of that contradicts if you pay attention to what I said and I really don't feel like I should need to explain this because even in this own post this contradicts what
you just said to me that I am townreading people based solely on their opinions agreeing with me
which you didn't fucking demonstrate in this very post.
Is the bolded at typo? I never said you were townreading people based on their opinions agreeing with you. I said something very different.

I said you are scumreading people despite their opinions agreeing with your opinions.

- OS

yes thats a typo. f-me

Definitely Not Scum · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:10 pm

In post 469, bitbringer wrote:In the large scheme of things I am saying theres nothing wrong with a scumread on me if I believe it is genuine.
You haven't shown that and are continually not showing sorting
.

Do you really believe the bolded?

- OS

bitbringer · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:10 pm

In post 471, Definitely Not Scum wrote:
In post 469, bitbringer wrote:In the large scheme of things I am saying theres nothing wrong with a scumread on me if I believe it is genuine.
You haven't shown that and are continually not showing sorting
.
Do you really believe the bolded?

- OS

1 million percent.

bitbringer · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:12 pm

Saying "X is scummy" "Y is townie" is not sorting btw. In case someone wants to argue it is.

Definitely Not Scum · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:13 pm

In post 472, bitbringer wrote:
In post 471, Definitely Not Scum wrote:
In post 469, bitbringer wrote:In the large scheme of things I am saying theres nothing wrong with a scumread on me if I believe it is genuine.
You haven't shown that and are continually not showing sorting
.
Do you really believe the bolded?

- OS
1 million percent.

So you believe the bolded, despite Dunnstral linking a game you thought he did something where he posted only 11 times the entire game.

It's funny because in that game Dunnstral also caught scum you instantly.

- OS