I kinda support this actuallyIn post 1024, Wake1 wrote:I have been prodded. Again.
My trigger finger is itching. I wanna shoot someone.
Faster we get info the more our lynch can be accurate, or something like that
I kinda support this actuallyIn post 1024, Wake1 wrote:I have been prodded. Again.
My trigger finger is itching. I wanna shoot someone.
Worst of all Time, like Goat is greatest of all Time. Woat=generally really bad town.In post 1020, chkflip wrote:What does woat mean?
Oh good, that makes sense. I couldn’t understand why we had so little time left, if he had added it.In post 1023, chkflip wrote:3 days if you tack on the 2 day extension GIF gave us to the opening vote count of this phase.
Why not you? I think you’re the most logical vigshot, as I keep saying.In post 1028, Creature wrote:If someone should be shot then it's not me
I'm one vote away from being lynched and we don't have much timeIn post 1034, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Why not you? I think you’re the most logical vigshot, as I keep saying.In post 1028, Creature wrote:If someone should be shot then it's not me
And what’s the difference to you whether you’re vigged or lynched?
In post 1035, Creature wrote:I'm one vote away from being lynched and we don't have much timeIn post 1034, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Why not you? I think you’re the most logical vigshot, as I keep saying.In post 1028, Creature wrote:If someone should be shot then it's not me
And what’s the difference to you whether you’re vigged or lynched?
Enough said
If we have 3 days, I think we still have time. Do you seriously think we’d have trouble getting Wake lynched?In post 1023, chkflip wrote:3 days if you tack on the 2 day extension GIF gave us to the opening vote count of this phase.
I’m personally torn between wanting to be here at endgame to help make sure town gets it right and wanting out of this boring game.In post 1036, chkflip wrote:Wake shoots _x_ (someone else heavily considered as town), lynch Creature, lynch Wake.
This is, obviously, assuming _x_ is town.
Why are you so confident on Chemist mime? Before he replaced in, you wanted to shoot Pine.In post 1031, Creature wrote:I think Chemist is pretty much mime here
Gamma and Map I'm both really unsure
That was considering if you, Gamma and Map were claiming scum, in that case Pine would need to go in order for town to have a shot at winning.In post 1040, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:Why are you so confident on Chemist mime?In post 1031, Creature wrote:I think Chemist is pretty much mime here
Gamma and Map I'm both really unsureBefore he replaced in, you wanted to shoot Pine.
In post 1021, chkflip wrote:Oh it's rude. That's cool.
I want Wake to shoot today. Like asap. Then we save his lynch for last.
Gamma wants Wake to not shoot today. He wants them to shoot after another town lynch.
I want to keep Wake alive until lynching him wins.
Gamma wants to lynch Wake immediately.
Idk how tf that's still confusing.
You mean fuck?In post 1045, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also that’s not what I want to do with Wake at all what the fuck
I don't see how this means literally anything else other than what I'm saying, so excuse my... ignorance? I'm woat after all. I also EXPLICITLY SAID the same thing not that many posts ago and you said, quote:In post 940, Gamma Emerald wrote:Currently we have 7 people alive. At five alive with no further mime deaths, we hit LyWin, where one more town lynch wins the game.If we do vig into lynch Wake NOW, we merely hit LyWin versus winning the game. I assume you’re trying to propose a final win here which wouldn’t be possible rn
So excuse me while I walk over there to lolwutIn post 951, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m not running it specifically but see no reason not to. Pyrrha seems to be lobbying for it at this moment without realizing doing it right now is not a win.In post 947, chkflip wrote:Gamma is running with the vanilla "I'm so town" thought process that Wake's best use of their ability is when we only need 2 more town lynches. It's under the caveat that Wake hits town, we lynch Wake, and town wins.
I'm vehemently against this plan as previously stated.