I suppose. That's how about 50% of my conversations go, anywayIn post 72, Pine wrote:I think you and I are more or less on the same page, just using different words?
+1In post 75, Something_Smart wrote:I suppose. That's how about 50% of my conversations go, anywayIn post 72, Pine wrote:I think you and I are more or less on the same page, just using different words?
My point is just that the doc isn't special, it's just vulnerable to being accidentally outed, and so we should do everything in our power to avoid that.
I think you’re ascribing malice to what is more likely carelessness. I’m not giving any credit to Titus beyond pointing out that the Doc could be used as an IC, an important note that I didn’t even think of until she suggested itIn post 74, OkaPoka wrote:okay but claiming d2/d3 although still suboptimal is not titus's planIn post 71, Pine wrote:Because nuance, OkaPoka. S_S’s plan is where we should start, until we decide we want to blow the setup open.In post 67, OkaPoka wrote:I'm interested in why Pine thinks Titus's plan has any merit whatsoever when S_S literally presented a better plan
Titus’s plan is bad for D1, but has merit later in the game
like i feel like your are giving credit to titus when she deserves none
Yeah phone operator is named mod-confirmed town who can, on a very low chance, find the doctor and thus can gate lynches to protect the doc, leading to ic-->hidden IC on d2-3.In post 45, Pine wrote:Indecisive Doc is a weak role, and Phone Operator is almost meaningless except to catch obvious lies...which is also pretty meaningless.
A D2 or D3 Innocent Child, however, is very strong.
but when does town ever play optimally, ss?In post 50, Something_Smart wrote:This happens anyway though, if we force whoever we lynch to out their neighbor before they die.
She's town but we should be sticking to "strategy A" until there's a town consensus to switch to "strategy B"In post 78, OkaPoka wrote:whats ur 2 cents on titus krazy
I'll keep leading the horses to water. Sooner or later one of them is bound to take a drink.
Probably not. Did you have anything in mind?In post 82, Pine wrote:I feel like we should stop any voting and claiming and whatnot and actually discuss this setup. It might be semi-breakable.
Right the fuck now, when every single one of us has three voices of reason in our heads.In post 81, Krazy wrote:but when does town ever play optimally, ss?In post 50, Something_Smart wrote:This happens anyway though, if we force whoever we lynch to out their neighbor before they die.
Right this minute I’m not sure. At my in-laws watching a very good movie. This is the sort of thing I need a legal pad, some coffee, and an hour to really explore.In post 86, Something_Smart wrote:Probably not. Did you have anything in mind?In post 82, Pine wrote:I feel like we should stop any voting and claiming and whatnot and actually discuss this setup. It might be semi-breakable.
Works for me. I wanted to stay the fuck away from White Flag because it’s got a 75%+ scum winrate, so I’ll take a Townsided setup in its place. The fuck did that skull come from.In post 95, Pine wrote:
Just because it’s probably +Town EV doesn’t mean it’s guaranteed, we need to do our due diligence
PE: this is a new setup suggested by someone after the process began (I forget who). It hasn’t been stress-tested
