Team Mafia 2020: Normal Game (Endgame)

MathBlade · Post Post #6850 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:09 am

In post 6847, Iconeum wrote:Math plz talk about your relation to the both lunches that happened?

I don’t understand the question and gotta go

Iconeum · Post Post #6851 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:09 am

In post 6848, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6845, Iconeum wrote:
In post 6837, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6833, skitter30 wrote:
In post 6780, MathBlade wrote:I was kinda hoping I was killed and wouldn’t have to relook into stuff.
Um ...
There's really no universe where u were the nk last night

I feel like ur trying to push this 'obvs i am conftown narrative' that doesnt really match with the facts, like now, and yesterday when u freaked out that i questioned you being conftown before ico confirmed he was on you
Again didn’t say my hope was logical. I was drained from this game
Drained? Upon a scum flip? I felt regenerated when I saw that
The entire reason Xtom is suspicious is the entire reason I doubt my save is genuine

None of what anyone claims makes sense and Xtom being scum is too “easy”

Strange because the current claims make perfect sense if scum have a thee power like strongman

skitter30 · Post Post #6852 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:10 am

In post 6821, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6819, Iconeum wrote:Omg math is actually scum
RCE+Ico

Lynch me today/tomorrow then speed lynch RCE and Ico.

I dont get it, this doesnt seem like a real position to have

Iconeum · Post Post #6853 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:11 am

In post 6850, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6847, Iconeum wrote:Math plz talk about your relation to the both lunches that happened?
I don’t understand the question and gotta go

You were on town lunch

Strong against scum lynch

And were blocking obv scum push in Xtoxm by diverting to shos who was starting to town up

skitter30 · Post Post #6854 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:12 am

In post 6853, Iconeum wrote:Strong against scum lynch

Right this too

Flopz · Post Post #6855 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:15 am

In post 6852, skitter30 wrote:
In post 6821, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6819, Iconeum wrote:Omg math is actually scum
RCE+Ico

Lynch me today/tomorrow then speed lynch RCE and Ico.
I dont get it, this doesnt seem like a real position to have

I mean if RCE being jailed prevented the lynch and then Ico lied about being protective it makes sense under that train of logic.

Flopz · Post Post #6856 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:15 am

Also, Skitter, where's the claim?

Flopz · Post Post #6857 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:15 am

*NK not lynch, I words good.

Iconeum · Post Post #6858 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:20 am

In post 6855, Flopz wrote:
In post 6852, skitter30 wrote:
In post 6821, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6819, Iconeum wrote:Omg math is actually scum
RCE+Ico

Lynch me today/tomorrow then speed lynch RCE and Ico.
I dont get it, this doesnt seem like a real position to have
I mean if RCE being jailed prevented the lynch and then Ico lied about being protective it makes sense under that train of logic.

That's v risky for scum because you risk being counterclaim Ed on the spot

Iconeum · Post Post #6859 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:21 am

Don't lynch for at least another 48 hours

I am gonna gif it up in the morning

Flopz · Post Post #6860 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:22 am

In post 6858, Iconeum wrote:
In post 6855, Flopz wrote:
In post 6852, skitter30 wrote:
In post 6821, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6819, Iconeum wrote:Omg math is actually scum
RCE+Ico

Lynch me today/tomorrow then speed lynch RCE and Ico.
I dont get it, this doesnt seem like a real position to have
I mean if RCE being jailed prevented the lynch and then Ico lied about being protective it makes sense under that train of logic.
That's v risky for scum because you risk being counterclaim Ed on the spot

Which is why I don't think both of you and RCE are scum.

Flopz · Post Post #6861 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:26 am

Ico it's worth to restate that you only claimed protective in D2 and not Doc. So you wouldn't have gotten counterclaimed "on the spot" anyways as people may have assumed you were Doc, you never outright stated it. You only claimed Doc today. I wouldn't put it past a very good scum player to think that as nobody claimed Doc in D2 when everyone assumed they were Doc that nobody was in fact Doc. Still very risky tho but less risky than an outright claim yesterday.

Flopz · Post Post #6862 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:27 am

Which you did not do.

MathBlade · Post Post #6863 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:28 am

In post 6861, Flopz wrote:Ico it's worth to restate that you only claimed protective in D2 and not Doc. So you wouldn't have gotten counterclaimed "on the spot" anyways as people may have assumed you were Doc, you never outright stated it. You only claimed Doc today. I wouldn't put it past a very good scum player to think that as nobody claimed Doc in D2 when everyone assumed they were Doc that nobody was in fact Doc. Still very risky tho but less risky than an outright claim yesterday.

This is wrong
Ico claimed doc d2

MathBlade · Post Post #6864 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:29 am

What’s really telling is that if I am scum (which I am not)

Then scum don’t kill me.

Then where’s the missing kill in that case? RCE would have to be scum in that world except Ico and Skitter attack me.

It’s rather telling.

Flopz · Post Post #6865 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:30 am

In post 6863, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6861, Flopz wrote:Ico it's worth to restate that you only claimed protective in D2 and not Doc. So you wouldn't have gotten counterclaimed "on the spot" anyways as people may have assumed you were Doc, you never outright stated it. You only claimed Doc today. I wouldn't put it past a very good scum player to think that as nobody claimed Doc in D2 when everyone assumed they were Doc that nobody was in fact Doc. Still very risky tho but less risky than an outright claim yesterday.
This is wrong
Ico claimed doc d2

I looked at the ISO eariler on today. Maybe I missed it. Can you link it. The closest I saw was in one instance where Ico was calling themselves a doc hypothetically and not actually.

Flopz · Post Post #6866 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:34 am

Interesting that Teacher and Skitter haven't claimed yet.

MathBlade · Post Post #6867 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:35 am

In post 6865, Flopz wrote:
In post 6863, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6861, Flopz wrote:Ico it's worth to restate that you only claimed protective in D2 and not Doc. So you wouldn't have gotten counterclaimed "on the spot" anyways as people may have assumed you were Doc, you never outright stated it. You only claimed Doc today. I wouldn't put it past a very good scum player to think that as nobody claimed Doc in D2 when everyone assumed they were Doc that nobody was in fact Doc. Still very risky tho but less risky than an outright claim yesterday.
This is wrong
Ico claimed doc d2
I looked at the ISO eariler on today. Maybe I missed it. Can you link it. The closest I saw was in one instance where Ico was calling themselves a doc hypothetically and not actually.

I can’t I am at work but there was a discussion about Ico being jk possibly then afterward iirc he specifically claimed doctor

skitter30 · Post Post #6868 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:38 am

In post 6866, Flopz wrote:Interesting that Teacher and Skitter haven't claimed yet.

I thought we were popcorning and i didnt see my name yet, i can go whenever

skitter30 · Post Post #6869 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:38 am

In post 6856, Flopz wrote:Also, Skitter, where's the claim?

Oh here
Vt

skitter30 · Post Post #6870 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:39 am

In post 6855, Flopz wrote:
In post 6852, skitter30 wrote:
In post 6821, MathBlade wrote:
In post 6819, Iconeum wrote:Omg math is actually scum
RCE+Ico

Lynch me today/tomorrow then speed lynch RCE and Ico.
I dont get it, this doesnt seem like a real position to have
I mean if RCE being jailed prevented the lynch and then Ico lied about being protective it makes sense under that train of logic.

No, not really

skitter30 · Post Post #6871 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:39 am

Rce you can go next

Iconeum · Post Post #6872 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:40 am

In post 6864, MathBlade wrote:What’s really telling is that if I am scum (which I am not)

Then scum don’t kill me.

Then where’s the missing kill in that case? RCE would have to be scum in that world except Ico and Skitter attack me.

It’s rather telling.

You are conveniently leaving out the fact that rce could have been saved

skitter30 · Post Post #6873 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:42 am

Math keeps doing this kinda icky thing where he's acting like it's obvious he was csaved (and conftowned) when it really isnt

MathBlade · Post Post #6874 (ISO) » Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:52 am

In post 6872, Iconeum wrote:
In post 6864, MathBlade wrote:What’s really telling is that if I am scum (which I am not)

Then scum don’t kill me.

Then where’s the missing kill in that case? RCE would have to be scum in that world except Ico and Skitter attack me.

It’s rather telling.
You are conveniently leaving out the fact that rce could have been saved

And you’re leaving out the fact Bella could be scum. We’re making judgments based upon what we know. I know I am town. And in response to skitter I am literally considering I am not conf town so...