alsoIn post 260, RadiantCowbells wrote:i actually wanted to pick aaronfrost but i'm fine with you.
this was specifically because they were my hitler read
and i wanted to force them to play L or out themselves and kill the late game plan
alsoIn post 260, RadiantCowbells wrote:i actually wanted to pick aaronfrost but i'm fine with you.
alsoIn post 260, RadiantCowbells wrote:i actually wanted to pick aaronfrost but i'm fine with you.
it was really more of aIn post 347, AaronFrost wrote:I mean I wasn't actually lying. I really did get three FIn post 339, RadiantCowbells wrote:remember when i said aaron shouldn't touch the deck again if he passed a 3f and you said i was being silly
Yeah, sorry I was too salty about you nailing me right away AGAIN. I think I don't know how to play this game
+1In post 353, Pine wrote:For real, though, your insistence that you were obviously Town that early was mega bullshit
I agree, even as a lib there was just no way to prove my role.In post 356, Pine wrote:The problem for me here was that I never had a single chance to do anything mechanically pro-Liberal, while RC was given opportunity after opportunity. I felt like Sisyphus
That WAS me being active, and I WAS trying to look lib. I'm sorry that I can't sit down and do nothing but a marathon. We're potty training right now, and 25ish posts an hour should be good enoughIn post 355, Ircher wrote:I'll be running the next marathon: viewtopic.php?f=156&t=82161
At Pine: main thing is you have to be more active and look like a liberal as Hitler. I think you give yourself away too easily by not looking like you're doing anything constructive.
If he was Hitler which there was a small possibility he was, we would have lostIn post 359, Ircher wrote:I have to agree with RC here. He was mechanically more likely town, even if it was a very slight % increase.
it's because in SH you don't need all the town to find each other, you just need a working townblockIn post 360, dsjstr wrote:I agree, even as a lib there was just no way to prove my role.In post 356, Pine wrote:The problem for me here was that I never had a single chance to do anything mechanically pro-Liberal, while RC was given opportunity after opportunity. I felt like Sisyphus
Passing a liberal policy round 1 is a complete null tell and you somehow convinced yourself that it wasn't because it was you. If anyone else had tried that shit, you'd have never let them be elected for anything ever againIn post 357, RadiantCowbells wrote:like
that's not the point
the point is that there was a point where i was the ONLY person in the game who had passed a lib policy as gov
and i was still the person the plurality of people were talking about as scum
that's a really problematic gamestate.
you don't worry about RC Hitler outside of hitler zoneIn post 363, dsjstr wrote:If he was Hitler which there was a small possibility he was, we would have lostIn post 359, Ircher wrote:I have to agree with RC here. He was mechanically more likely town, even if it was a very slight % increase.
bruhIn post 365, Pine wrote:Passing a liberal policy round 1 is a complete null tell and you somehow convinced yourself that it wasn't because it was you. If anyone else had tried that shit, you'd have never let them be elected for anything ever againIn post 357, RadiantCowbells wrote:like
that's not the point
the point is that there was a point where i was the ONLY person in the game who had passed a lib policy as gov
and i was still the person the plurality of people were talking about as scum
that's a really problematic gamestate.
I recommend you read the Round 2 with myself and NSG scum if you want to get a better feel for how playing F isIn post 369, Pine wrote:Mmmkay, apparently I just shouldn't play this game anymore.