I feel like at least one person says i make a semantics slip every game. do i just type really haphazardly? it's starting to become a pet peeve of mine.In post 238, dsjstr wrote:Part of that has to do with the slip I saw,I just noticed that MT referred to the town as "them" when saying that there are at least 5 town in group 1 and they should not vote for their own group. This seems weird to me and looks like MT could have slipped. If they are town then theyIn post 13, Morning Tweet wrote:First impressions: i feel that it is unlikely scum placed 2 of themselves in group 2, or 2 of themselves in group 3
That seems like a lot of risk, because at a glance you'd expect us to probably pick group 2 or 3 for the lynch, and it'd be hard to stop it if one of those groups gained traction. all it would take is one scummy member in the group and you'd lose that group and 2/3rds of the scumteam
Whereas if you placed 2+ scum inside group one, it'd likely be easier to steer the lynch away from one to one of the smaller groups.after all, there's at least 5 town in group one and im sure at least some of them would not want to die
I just realized while writing this that if we lynch group one, and there's zero scum in there, we lose the game immediately. ack!
would have included them self as part of the town. Instead he talks about town being other people, now what does this have to do with group 3? If you look at MT's first read list you will notice that Mohab is the only strong town read. I personally
He's pretty obvtown. Mixture of things. As scum, he's more reserved, doesn't take hard stances, I'd expect him to talk more setup and less reads/potential slips. Also, being paranoid of his own group is reminiscent of you know what.
Hoc, I'm referring to thisIn post 242, Hoctac wrote:I think I get what she's referring to, but I'm not 100% sure. I'm not going to explain it in case I'm wrong.
who would do that? me. some other people have mentioned they would too. it's weird but i'm led to think there's something very appealing about 3 scum in group 1; the whole team united in one goal to protect their group and either of the others can go. it's a...emotional read?In post 244, Ame wrote:Kanna I'm not ignoring you, I'm just going to quote everything later. Actually, since I'm already typing this I can respond to 164. It's your reasoning that you are using to justify there being 3 scum in group 1 that comes off as disingenuous. Who do you know besides myself that hates being scum so much that they would throw all their eggs in one basket? It seems unlikely the entire scum team would agree to such a strategy.
Oh... I'm not going to say. You go first.In post 254, Ame wrote:Hoc, I'm referring to thisIn post 242, Hoctac wrote:I think I get what she's referring to, but I'm not 100% sure. I'm not going to explain it in case I'm wrong.
Doro!In post 86, dsjstr wrote:I was also thinking of voting for group 3 tbh
Group 1 is too risky and if there is 1 member in group 2 then even without reads it would be a 50/50 we get them the next day.
I was unimpressed by the ISO... and uhh... maybe not as strong as the other one but it's still nothing to townread.In post 248, Daenerys and Dragons wrote: and enomis?
and then subsequently get his group knocked out of the game. Why not put a more.. active player in group #3 that could sway town to group #2?In post 226, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:like he claims he's demoralized and can use that to be lazy and not try to scumhunt
- Daenerys
No games with him; I'm quite new here. But I spent a lot of time metaing him pregame and I'm confident in my read, but there's just one hiccup involving the question I asked him. I need to understand why he immediately went for group 3 over 2.In post 267, Kanna wrote:@Hoctac; how much experience do you have with Dsj and how confident are you of your read on him?
I think given the ellipsis it is acceptable as it reflects a natural pause in speech where the speaker is unaware of the word they are going to use next and so cannot anticipate the proper form of a/an to use beforehand.