imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)
In post 26, Kilgamayan wrote:imo what to do with someone that doesn't want to hammer depends on how they handle the situation. Someone that goes "no I'm townreading them and that's that" and shoves their fingers in their ears can be sent to the guillotine the next day because that reeks of scum wanting to avoid hammering a supersaint. I'd be substantially more willing to give leeway to someone that goes "I'm townreading this person for A B C reasons and I think the case against them doesn't fly for X Y Z reasons" and actually makes an effort to dissuade the lynch onto someone else they find scummier. (Assuming their argumentation isn't all bunk, of course.)
Too much word salad 2/10 VOTE: kilga
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
In post 41, Hoctac wrote:I'm very confused. It seems we have a claim and a counterclaim already? I think that means one of them is lying and we should lynch one.
Vote the admitted liar, I, on the other hand, would never admit to something as incriminating as pretending to be a PR not in the setup.
On surface level, this post is apperently attempting to to point out the logical conclusion that I, HoldenGolden, am calling myself a Moron. However, this post gets much deeper by using Emjoi Analysis (EA), where the real scummy intentions come alive. We all know that such a contradiction coming from a townie PoV would use either the (if you are a filthy casual) or (If you want a comedic option). Coupled with a lack of any other analysis besides EA, this is certainly a scummy attempt at discrediting my intelligence.
You not only get my Finger, but my own Arm of Suspicion
In post 41, Hoctac wrote:I'm very confused. It seems we have a claim and a counterclaim already? I think that means one of them is lying and we should lynch one.
Vote the admitted liar, I, on the other hand, would never admit to something as incriminating as pretending to be a PR not in the setup.
I want you to vote Holden if that wasn't clear.
Ah but by trying to defeat the evil you saw in my lying ways, you too lied to CC me. So which one of us is a real liar. The one who admitted to lying, or the one trying to cover up the lie he told?
On surface level, this post is apperently attempting to to point out the logical conclusion that I, HoldenGolden, am calling myself a Moron. However, this post gets much deeper by using Emjoi Analysis (EA), where the real scummy intentions come alive. We all know that such a contradiction coming from a townie PoV would use either the (if you are a filthy casual) or (If you want a comedic option). Coupled with a lack of any other analysis besides EA, this is certainly a scummy attempt at discrediting my intelligence.
You not only get my Finger, but my own Arm of Suspicion
(if you are a filthy casual) or 
(If you want a comedic option). Coupled with a lack of any other analysis besides EA, this is certainly a scummy attempt at discrediting my intelligence. 