Mini Normal 2149 | Philosophers | Over

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1800 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:04 am

In post 1798, Blair wrote:Yes.

Why would you wait with not lynching confirmed scum and taking the risk of you being blocked/mafia doctor being in setup rather than lynching him on that day and then attempting to shoot one of his teammates the ensuing night?

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1801 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:05 am

In post 1799, popopopopopopo wrote:Sad!

What's sad is your attempts at looking town today.

popopopopopopo · Post Post #1802 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:06 am

Blairs actions make zero sense from town pov

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1803 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:08 am

In post 1795, popopopopopopo wrote:Might as well MC at this point

Let's not btw. I think it's pretty obvious we've got what we need. A vig counterclaim on you was all i really wanted to see.

Blair · Post Post #1804 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:10 am

No one wanted to follow my plan, so here we are.

popopopopopopo · Post Post #1805 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:11 am

In post 1803, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 1795, popopopopopopo wrote:Might as well MC at this point
Let's not btw. I think it's pretty obvious we've got what we need. A vig counterclaim on you was all i really wanted to see.

I think we should MC. Why do you want to deny town information?

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1806 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:11 am

In post 1804, Blair wrote:No one wanted to follow my plan, so here we are.

Yeah, because your plan sucked. I suggest we just lynch Popopo today.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1807 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:11 am

If your plan was to lynch someone besides popopo that was individually scummy while shooting him at night while you remained unclaimed then yes, that's the plan I wanted to follow

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1808 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:11 am

In post 1805, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 1803, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 1795, popopopopopopo wrote:Might as well MC at this point
Let's not btw. I think it's pretty obvious we've got what we need. A vig counterclaim on you was all i really wanted to see.
I think we should MC. Why do you want to deny town information?

Lmao.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1809 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:13 am

"Please out more PR's guys! I'm not scum i promise!"

Blair · Post Post #1810 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:21 am

Scum will shoot me tonight and Norwe tomorrow night - protective roles, take note.

popopopopopopo · Post Post #1811 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:29 am

In post 1809, NorwegianboyEE wrote:"Please out more PR's guys! I'm not scum i promise!"

Well let's see. You outed urself as gunsmith, you outed me as vig, and csf is a dead doctor. I don't see their being many other PRs. A mass claim would be useful. Popcorn to nauci.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1812 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:31 am

In post 1811, popopopopopopo wrote:You outed urself as gunsmith, you outed me as vig, and csf is a dead doctor.

No, a more accurate timeline would be=
I crumb cop. You claim VT and that i'm faking my guilty. I reveal actually being gunsmith, which completely screwed over your plan, you then reveal actually being a vigilante, then someone counterclaims you being a vigilante.

popopopopopopo · Post Post #1813 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:39 am

I'm town, so i knew the cop claim was false. Thats why I claimed VT, no sense in outing my PR for a false guilty

Dunnstral · Post Post #1814 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:40 am

In post 1812, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I crumb cop. You claim VT and that i'm faking my guilty. I reveal actually being gunsmith, which completely screwed over your plan,

What is his plan in this scenario?

popopopopopopo · Post Post #1815 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:41 am

when I flip town and this game is a 1000% WIFOM cluster fuck maybe norwe will learn a lesson about partial/fake claiming to "catch people out" being extremely anti town.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1816 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 3:44 am

In post 1814, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1812, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I crumb cop. You claim VT and that i'm faking my guilty. I reveal actually being gunsmith, which completely screwed over your plan,
What is his plan in this scenario?

To make me look like scum obviously. What else is there for caught scum to do in that situation?

Blair · Post Post #1817 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:06 am

In post 1813, popopopopopopo wrote:I'm town, so i knew the cop claim was false. Thats why I claimed VT, no sense in outing my PR for a false guilty

He said he had an investigation on you. If you're a Vigilante, and someone claims a guilty investigation on you, you immediately know they are a Gunsmith (or Psychologist).

If you're scum and someone claims a guilty investigation on you, you can't be certain what the investigation was.

Your uncertainty gave you away.

popopopopopopo · Post Post #1818 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:40 am

In post 1615, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I have a guilty on Popopo. Happy?

I saw this post. I didnt even think of gunsmith, the possibility didn't enter my head. So I assumed it was a fake guilty or a framer

popopopopopopo · Post Post #1819 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:41 am

Why would I out my PR in response to a guilty investigation I know to be false

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1820 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:53 am

In post 1819, popopopopopopo wrote:Why would I out my PR in response to a guilty investigation I know to be false

In post 1817, Blair wrote:He said he had an investigation on you. If you're a Vigilante, and someone claims a guilty investigation on you, you immediately know they are a Gunsmith (or Psychologist).

If you're scum and someone claims a guilty investigation on you, you can't be certain what the investigation was.

Your uncertainty gave you away.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #1821 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:55 am

Keep in mind. I never specifically stated what my "guilty" was. In fact i stated it was a "very specific guilty" in a previous post. This should have clued you in, but instead you immediately assumed i was a cop. Which proves your scum mindset.

Nauci · Post Post #1822 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:36 am

Wow apparently I don't need to catch up after all

what the hell

also Blair whyyyyyyyyy it's only day 2 dangit

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1823 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:41 am

In post 1788, Blair wrote:Why double down on the idea of an unlimited shot killing role after an uncountered 2-shot claim?

Because I wanted to make sure there was

no possibility

of there being SK in this game. Suddenly when I want to make sure of something, that makes me Scummy, apparently.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #1824 (ISO) » Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

In post 1806, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 1804, Blair wrote:No one wanted to follow my plan, so here we are.
Yeah, because your plan sucked.

It did. It really really doesn't make sense to direct the NK of the Vig and you really really should know better than that.

VOTE: Blair