In post 875, beeboy wrote:you just don't recognize me giving Nahdia space because we are friends
feels like beeboy doth protest too much. giving nahdia space isn't part of my read nor was it something i ever mentioned?
In post 875, beeboy wrote:I don't see how this early you can be making partner associations
In post 876, beeboy wrote:Bleh Drusilla's reads just don't feel right to me. I just don't see how a reasonable individual just keeps pairing people off, rather then just targeting me as an individual.
Maybe she just has this insane bias against the mannerism of my posting which is why she paired me off with both Kanna and Nahdia since she has having trouble vocalizing a read in another way?
the association with nahdia came after i explained my scumread of you. the partner associations are due to me being asked to elaborate as to why i thought post
684 was noteworthy here:
i made a similar observation here:
and had kanna asked me what this tells me i would have said it was + partner equity for midwaybear and skitter. that does not mean that i think they are definitely partners or that they are only scum with eachother, but that those posts make it more likely than it would otherwise be to me. i think you are focusing on the partner associations and implying that the only way that i am town is if i am an unreasonable person or biased against you to discredit me.
yep.
In post 894, Nahdia wrote:but i dont like how she seems to just use me being scum as a baseline assumption without, justifying it? like, to read beeboy or kanna as partners.
i was asked to explain why i thought your post was noteworthy. outside of it i think you are more likely to be town than either beeboy or kanna as i've previously indicated.
In post 922, beeboy wrote:I also don't see much momentum heading towards Drusilla so I moved my vote if you want my particular tactical reason. If I ever see votes move onto Drusilla that makes them viable I will move onto them.
ah, so now you are openly doing what i thought you were doing earlier in a clandestine manner with regards to feeling out support for pressuring me.
In post 968, Kanna wrote:do you really think this read is reliable? although, the fact that you did bring up your own game with this makes me feel like you prepared it as backup if this conversation got to this stage
i think that it is, yes. it is very hard to research because there is no way to search for instances of it beyond reading game after game after game and it isn't something i had thought to look for until gacha mafia. i brought up my own game because i was finding it difficult to explain the open/closed question thing otherwise and that is the post it goes back to.
In post 968, Kanna wrote: In post 865, drusilla wrote:i don't see any buddying or distancing from skitter in the early game events surrounding her and dunnstral and i don't think that is an opportunity scum!skitter would miss with the game focused on her and she did not accept a potential reason for townreading her when given the option. that seems to far outweigh her talking nicely about lilith/beeboy/me and pointing out potential associatives even if you think those associatives are weak. so it felt like you were working toward the conclusion 'skitter is mafia', not evaluating her.
what's your experience with skitter? how familiar are you with her play? do you think i should have picked up on this and townread her? i don't understand your conclusion at all
other than you, i am the most familiar with skitter from this playerlist. we previously played together in newbie 1992 and mystery box of silver gnine and i have read many of her games outside of that. her play in jazz mafia is one of the reasons i joined the site. i do not think you would have had to have individually picked up on what i did in order to townread her because you asked me to elaborate on my read of skitter, a read you said you then accepted, so i would have expected you to weigh the information i presented against the information that was informing your read of skitter which you had not yet presented.
In post 968, Kanna wrote:yes? i think i'm playing pretty normally, although thinking back, i did post a readlist which i don't normally do which i feel like most of this is based on. what do you think if i told you i just felt like posting one this time?
it isn't simply that you posted a readslist - you had done this at a similar point in one of your newbie games as well - but that the readslist this game contained a poe which you then solely worked from, which i do not believe is pretty normal or even something you've ever done before, and in general creating a limited subset to scumhunt within is scum indicative. maybe i am explaining this very poorly (since morning tweet also seemed to think the 'mechanical' read was based solely on the readslist) so i will try again:
you present a readslist. at the bottom of this readslist is a five person poe: skitter, lilith, raven branwen, nahdia, me.
you then ask me to elaborate on my read of skitter and the open question previously discussed.
you then ask nahdia about their read of beeboy (and beeboy about something nahdia pointed out in the same post) and lilith why she says she is out of her scumrange.
you then ask skitter a couple questions and respond to raven branwen asking you to elaborate on your readlist.
you then say you like raven branwen and vote skitter.
this sort of 'mechanical' 'following a checklist' (sorry i really don't know how to else to describe it. like you thought of where you were going, drew a map to get there, and followed it.) seems very scummy to me.
In post 968, Kanna wrote: In post 865, drusilla wrote:i do not have one unified theory but rather various thoughts to weigh against eachother. post 622 is + partner equity for you/beeboy because it stands out from your other elaborations. and if beeboy and nahdia are partners, it makes sense for nahdia to say you are town because of your townread of beeboy because then you are more likely to defend him in this situation as well. and if you and nahdia are partners, it makes sense for nahdia to say you are town because of your townread of beeboy because then beeboy is more likely to defend you. it doesn't seem all that likely that all three of you are mafia, but it seems extremely coincidental that nahdia's response to my scumread of you and beeboy was to say you are town because of your townread of beeboy, especially since that didn't seem like an excessively towny post to me.
this could be me being dumb but i still don't know why that means anything. in my question, i wanted you to explain what your theory was when you said it "stood out" - do you think in this situation all three of us are mafia? one? two? and why do you think the actions taken would make sense in that situation?
post
622 stands out because you presented it separately from your other elaborations:
clover is towny because .., morning/votato/tux are towny because .., dunnstral/clover/midway are towny because .., everyone else i haven't found a reason to townread.
next post: oh i forgot beeboy. beeboy is town because ...
so the most memorable of your reads is naturally beeboy is town.
it seems unlikely to me that all three of you are mafia, as i said in the post you quoted. it is most likely that only one of you are mafia, but quite possible that two of you are as well. i also explained why the actions taken would make sense in the post you quoted.
as i tried to explain to beeboy, it means something because nahdia's post seems unlikely to happen organically. i said beeboy and you are scummy. nahdia then said you are towny because of your townread of beeboy. maybe it doesn't make sense to ask you, but does
622 feel super towny to you? like if you had to pick one of your posts to say this is why i'm town so far would that have been the one? it seems more chosen because of the surrounding events than a real read to me.
In post 971, Kanna wrote: In post 869, drusilla wrote:that post by nahdia seems so unlikely to just happen to happen to me. like i know going down this road has caused me problems before but if you said skitter and i were mafia right now, and nahdia replied that she thought skitter was towny for her townread of me, what would you think?
by "going down this road," i'm assuming you mean conspiracy theories, right? and if so, why are you choosing to go down this road?
from memory, i think you stepped away from these and focused on more grounded theories for scumhunting - would you agree?
i think you are (potentially intentionally) conflating two somewhat related but disconnected things, at least in my mind. the 'conspiracy theories' (example:
viewtopic.php?p=11740253#p11740253 ) are something i have stepped away from for the most part. you know why i stopped playing on team rocket queen (as i explained it to your hydra in hungarian music 2) and the 'conspiracy theories' create the same associations with me. i still chase the thoughts that would lead me there (this quote from the opening flavour:
In post 0, Hectic wrote:You see, people have been dropping dead like it's the Black Death all over again.
paired with this image from shortly thereafter:
In post 2, Hectic wrote:The eccentric man wielding the Top Hat - which you must admit is quite magnificent - leads you through the streets of Lunacy. They are barren and there is not a person in sight.
which leads to 'the plague days' when reverse image searched makes it pretty unlikely that the first reference was a turn of phrase and thus rather likely that there is some sort of infection-related mechanic)
but i no longer present these in the same way because of the effect they have on the game. like 'town if she derails the game' is undesirable to me.
by 'going down this road' i simply meant noting what seems like a very unlikely coincidence. i have a somewhat shaky trackrecord with regards to this, as micro blitz iii or the aforementioned hungarian music would show, but if i believed more in myself and my thoughts in mystery box of silver gnine (that it was very unlikely that bugspray would have wholly invented the knife; which i noted but did not push extensively) town might have won. i was saying i am aware of the mistakes i have previously made in the realm of strange coincidences but even having considered that this still stands out to me.
In post 998, Kanna wrote:went through shiki's meta and i think i'm scumleaning her now. as town, she has more good faith takes and is more at the forefront of the game, while as scum, she does more background solving. she's also a bit agenda-y in pushing someone with reasons that are ok, but not the most *likely* (like doctorpepper in that gacha game). i feel like she might be doing that to me now actually; if she has to come up with conspiracy style reasoning for a scumread + draw a connections, she might not believe in it. it's like she saw the opportunity first and made a case around that, i think
also, i think i should be able to understand more of these theories if it came from a good place. in CoC, i remember i didn't mindmeld on anything as well. shiki, are you trying to mislynch me? it kinda hurts...
i can think of a handful of games i was at the forefront of as town and just as many if not more that i was not. the 'conspiracy style reasoning' was based on a thought i had about a single post made by nahdia that you asked me to elaborate on, not the basis for my scumread, as it came after.
i think you know i'm not. even this feels manipulative because you know how much i dislike upsetting people by incorrectly scumreading them (most notably datisi is newbie 1992, morning tweet in mystery box hate).