In post 1811, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Porkens: *Does nothing except tunnel the same read for an eternity. Never explaining much other than that he "feels" this is scum*
In post 1716, BananaCucho wrote:@Jackelgator, when you are back can you answer me a question please? Could you explain your vote on me? I shrugged if off earlier, but when I was going through your ISO I found these posts:
In post 1071, Starbuck wrote:I'm also concerned that Jackal jumped aboard that because I try to think the best of folks when there are longer than usual absences, which is why I stood up for her when folks went after her for the same thing yesterday. I also think androgybee's late entrance to Day 2 and shade of me (when they haven't even tried to be around) is hypocritical.
For the record, I don't think you're scum; I was just confused by Porkens thinking I had a TR on you. You're mostly null? I generally agree with your reads, and you don't mesh well with my top SRs. I just agreed that lurking can be a good strategy for scum to fly under the radar.
In post 1073, BananaCucho wrote:I can't remember who said it day 1, but eventually we're just gonna have to get some courage to vote a less active player, unless you want to vote an active player. Which imo is a bad idea right now because literally all scum has to do this game is target the rest of the active players at night and lurk the game into a victory, because after finding out Bell is a fruit vendor I'm not voting them and
I highly doubt that both DD+Norwee are scum
Why? Is it more that you townread them independently (so you think it's statistically unlikely that both would flip town), or that you have a specific reason for you thinking that those two wouldn't be scum together?\
In post 1097, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It's starting to feel really scummy how people like Jackel and Starbuck are scumread for bad content/bad posts yet they keep framing it as if they're being pushed for "inactivity" (even though that is also a point against them) and trying to vote active players.
Do you think only inactive players should be pushed right now? Also, that's not my main reason for SRing you. It's that I can't find any substance beyond the inactivity behind your reads, and you haven't responded once when I asked for some.
Not really, tbh? I tried to work it out, but it was just a mass of WIFOM. Like, I scumread NEE. I can build a narrative in my head for why NEE would kill Joey (lock in Joey's TR on him, throw suspicion on his SRs), but that's really just confirmation bias.
BananaCucho wrote:And I only have 1 corruption rn, if I get a 2nd corruption I won't die. I was able to cancel my self harm action with Dunn.
I mean, it'd probably be better for a generally scumread person to take it, especially one who doesn't have any corruption yet, imo?
From what I can see, you seemed to show concern for me taking the fruit from Bell again, assuming that I would die, and that that would be a bad thing. So I just need to clear up this point, thanks
I think I should ISO myself and see what questions I've asked people that they haven't answered -_- I'm sure there's 100+ for Porkens alone
Fine. In the first quote, I was saying that, assuming you were dying anyways, it would be a bad strategy. I also thought you had used your ability and had two corruption, not one, so the one fruit would kill you. I thought scum would just get a free kill.
In the second quote, I think it's pretty obvious that I was suggesting that I get the fruit. Since we've claimed, I can say that I am a VT, so I don't have as much utility besides being a corruption sponge, tbh. Granted, having seen how the scums' corruption works, this looks sus in retrospect.
The third quote was shortly after I'd seen Norwee's claim and decided you might be better statistically. I'd had suspicions you were a 3p, and the cleric claim lessened my suspicions of him in the moment. However, the Bell flip and the showing of how his corruption worked, plus his consume corruption ability, was enough to tip it back to NEE. You're still on my radar, though. I find it really weird that you didn't read your role all the way through, considering it seems pretty neat, and asking for corruption while you already have one corruption
and
have a PR power that gives corruption to yourself seems suspicious imo.
Jackel, why are you voting Norwee over Redtea? I've seen both you and Redtea ask about "safeclaims" but I finally google'd that - from the mafiascum wiki it seems that safeclaims aren't cc'd by town. So if its a safeclaim, it's one that both Redtea+Norwee are taking advantage of. Plus Redtea claimed after Norwee did, so logically shouldn't your vote be on Redtea?
I don't scum read your logic for this post, I think its very good just the vote is in the wrong place
Finally, as far as your concerns about me asking for corruption, that's fair - however 1st, I have an ability that I can use multiple times a day, and it extends the day, to receive corruption. If I was team demon and simply wanted corruption and didn't die from it, I would have used it multiple times by now.
Lastly, I ask your patience, for after I (likely) die, it will make sense. And if I don't die... trust me it will eventually make sense lol
I thought I said this before the quote, but I guess I forgot to:
"Okay, I went back and reread this post by Jackel, and I'm against her elimination today again. In fact, I think that Norwee/Redtea should target someone else if Porkens flips scum, but not sure who that is yet" - Banana
In post 1902, BananaCucho wrote:"Okay, I went back and reread this post by Jackel, and I'm against her elimination today again. In fact, I think that Norwee/Redtea should target someone else if Porkens flips scum, but not sure who that is yet" - Banana
DD then?
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 1902, BananaCucho wrote:"Okay, I went back and reread this post by Jackel, and I'm against her elimination today again. In fact, I think that Norwee/Redtea should target someone else if Porkens flips scum, but not sure who that is yet" - Banana
In post 1911, Porkens wrote:I don’t give a shit about claims this is the correct read based on play.
Lel
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
I'd retort more cleverly, but it might make Starbuck cry.
So i'll leave it at that.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
If Porkens is town and ignoring claims like they don't matter they're basically just gamethrowing anyway.
Either we get scum or we cut off a weak link that's just holding us back.
It's like there's nothing to lose.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Hey Catboi, if Starbuck is ready i don't mind if you hammer now.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
