Mini Normal 2159 | Cinder Block Mafia | Game Over!


User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #1425 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:33 am

Post by Raya36 »

I also don't have a meta read on RCE
User avatar
geraintm
geraintm
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
geraintm
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5841
Joined: March 9, 2006
Location: Wales

Post Post #1426 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:14 am

Post by geraintm »

In post 1416, Looker wrote:Why would you assume your reasoning is different from everyone else's? How willing would you be to eliminate Raya
i usually take an odd look at games. the way i get reads on people is usually from a different direction to mostpeople

i did look at raya in my post 1037. they looked suspicious, but from a point of view of looking for them to be scum. i havent done a full depth dive at everything raya has posted yet. i wouldnt vote for them yet, i dont want to move my vote right now
User avatar
Frogsterking
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6935
Joined: June 20, 2011
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Pond

Post Post #1427 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:20 am

Post by Frogsterking »

In post 1423, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1402, callforjudgement wrote:I'm not defending Frogster to get towncred on myself. In fact, I knew when I made the post that I might get scumread for it. I don't care, though; this looks like the sort of game that will get solved by PoE, and being able to remove one player from the PoE will be helpful for that, even if they are being worse than useless at the moment.

I don't believe Frogster (or anyone else) is capable of faking Frogster's play this game when scum. That sort of violent self-destructive tunnelling is just not something someone can do without truly believing in it. (I appreciate that this argument is more convincing to me than it is to other people, because a hypothetical scum!Frogster could truly believe that a hypothetical scum!me is scum. But if you have an argument that needs me to be scum to be correct, it makes more sense to focus on me first.)

I think it's very unlikely that this setup is 9:4. (This is partially due to reviewer meta. Talking only about completed games only because I don't know the setup of ongoing games and can't talk about them anyway, the last time mastina reviewed a 9:4, there was a lot of discussion in the review thread about whether the game could be Normal; this ended up dominating discussion, and mastina accidentally entirely forgot to do a balance review. The game turned out to be very scumsided (it would have been scumsided even as a 10:3), mastina got called out on it in the Normal Review Group forums, and apologised. Given what happened last time, I think that it's basically impossible that she makes such a mistake again, and it's almost impossible to cram enough roles into a 9:4 with a normal day/night cycle to balance it,
especially
if you're letting the scum multitask by default). Incidentally, in the very unlikely situation that the setup
is
9:4, this almost guarantees that Walter is scum because otherwise it would have been almost trivially easy for scum to redirect the day 1 deadline wagon without looking overly suspicious.
The last 9-4 I was in had a like 8 person neighborhood, a traitor, a cop, an IC, a babysitter, and an informed goon. Scum won easily and that was with elimming traitor day 1.
That sounds unbalanced. Surely there can be a way to balance a 9-4.
In post 1424, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1421, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1419, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 1413, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1410, Frogsterking wrote:I believe Raya has maybe played with some other players here before?
Yes I've played with a few people on the list before
Does that happen to be the players you're voting with?
Just RCE I believe?
Err before you ask I don't have any kind of meta read on Raya and I generally tend to scumread them.
In post 1425, Raya36 wrote:I also don't have a meta read on RCE
Okay thank you, that's what I was wondering.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
User avatar
RCEnigma
RCEnigma
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
RCEnigma
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12221
Joined: June 18, 2018

Post Post #1428 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:41 am

Post by RCEnigma »

In post 1427, Frogsterking wrote:That sounds unbalanced. Surely there can be a way to balance a 9-4.
There is. Make the setup 10-3.
User avatar
callforjudgement
callforjudgement
Microprocessor
User avatar
User avatar
callforjudgement
Microprocessor
Microprocessor
Posts: 3972
Joined: September 1, 2011

Post Post #1429 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:05 pm

Post by callforjudgement »

In post 1423, RCEnigma wrote:I think it's very unlikely that this setup is 9:4. (This is partially due to reviewer meta. Talking only about completed games only because I don't know the setup of ongoing games and can't talk about them anyway, the last time mastina reviewed a 9:4, there was a lot of discussion in the review thread about whether the game could be Normal; this ended up dominating discussion, and mastina accidentally entirely forgot to do a balance review. The game turned out to be very scumsided (it would have been scumsided even as a 10:3), mastina got called out on it in the Normal Review Group forums, and apologised. Given what happened last time, I think that it's basically impossible that she makes such a mistake again, and it's almost impossible to cram enough roles into a 9:4 with a normal day/night cycle to balance it,
especially
if you're letting the scum multitask by default). Incidentally, in the very unlikely situation that the setup
is
9:4, this almost guarantees that Walter is scum because otherwise it would have been almost trivially easy for scum to redirect the day 1 deadline wagon without looking overly suspicious.
The last 9-4 I was in had a like 8 person neighborhood, a traitor, a cop, an IC, a babysitter, and an informed goon. Scum won easily and that was with elimming traitor day 1.[/quote]
For the record, RCEnigma and I are talking about the same game, Mini Normal 2058.
scum
· scam · seam · team · term · tern · torn ·
town
User avatar
callforjudgement
callforjudgement
Microprocessor
User avatar
User avatar
callforjudgement
Microprocessor
Microprocessor
Posts: 3972
Joined: September 1, 2011

Post Post #1430 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 1:06 pm

Post by callforjudgement »

Also I messed up quote tags in the above, the bit that shows as being from RCEnigma was actually from me, the bit before the [/quote] is from RCEnigma.
scum
· scam · seam · team · term · tern · torn ·
town
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3193
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #1431 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:10 pm

Post by ItalianoVD »

For the record, between the two (Raya and CFJ) I am more willing to vote for CFJ than Raya.
User avatar
ItalianoVD
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
ItalianoVD
He
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3193
Joined: May 19, 2020
Pronoun: He
Location: Interregnum Multiverse

Post Post #1432 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:45 pm

Post by ItalianoVD »

In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1366, ItalianoVD wrote:@Raya: Your responses to my questions seem very townie looking at face value. I can’t know if this is your meta or not. Why do you feel it was okay to sacrifice shelly?
I feel like from my perspective I usually come across quite townie when I actually try as town. I wish I could give this game that effort right now. As scum I tend to be pretty obvious, I come across as unnatural and it's easy to see through my plans. Of course scum always feel like their scummy so maybe I'm not as bad at scum as I think?
Without knowing how you actually play as both alignments it’s hard to know what you mean by “obvious” and “unnatural”. What differences are there or can be seen when you are “trying as town” as opposed to not trying?
In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:I don't remember saying I was okay with sacrificing Shelly but there was a lot of suspicion on that slot so even if I read it as town I'd have been fine with the elimination. I did consistently read her as scummy-appearing town. It's still interesting how easy that elimination went through when there wasn't much of a push.
It may go against the grain, but I like this response. I was asking Raya this question as if she was scum sacrificing her scumbuddy and she answered it oblivious to the reasoning behind the question. If you are faking this response Raya, then kudos to you.
In post 1408, Frogsterking wrote:Yes Raya and Italiano are both motivated by fear of being incorrect.

Italiano is more specific in that his fear is in being incorrect about his scum reads, which is causing him to double take his reads continuously. Raya also appears to fear being incorrect about her scum read on Walter, with the opposite reaction of doubling down under pressure.

Raya, the issue I have with your slot is that you're not only absent from the game, you also appear significantly guarded in your thoughts and feelings. Being busy explains the absence but not necessarily the guardedness.

I think appearing guarded in this lobby is quite a feat, because I don't think this is the most trusting group of people in the world.
Fear of being incorrect is not it at all. I could be wrong, but that doesn’t motivate my actions. The evidence of the shelly wagon and the interactions everyone had with that slot is pretty telling. Shelly is a confirmed flip so I want to use that information as the foundation for where I go. I don’t want to speculate, because I don’t have to.
User avatar
Frogsterking
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6935
Joined: June 20, 2011
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Pond

Post Post #1433 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 3:45 pm

Post by Frogsterking »

I'm fine with a CFJ or Gamma BW.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #1434 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 5:09 pm

Post by Raya36 »

In post 1432, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1366, ItalianoVD wrote:@Raya: Your responses to my questions seem very townie looking at face value. I can’t know if this is your meta or not. Why do you feel it was okay to sacrifice shelly?
I feel like from my perspective I usually come across quite townie when I actually try as town. I wish I could give this game that effort right now. As scum I tend to be pretty obvious, I come across as unnatural and it's easy to see through my plans. Of course scum always feel like their scummy so maybe I'm not as bad at scum as I think?
Without knowing how you actually play as both alignments it’s hard to know what you mean by “obvious” and “unnatural”. What differences are there or can be seen when you are “trying as town” as opposed to not trying?
Honestly I'm not too sure but when I was more active over the summer I noticed that I was getting correctly townread quite a bit and they were usually voiced to be strong townreads. I think a part of it is as town I'll be very transparent, ask players lots of questions, genuinely try to be engaged and post lots. I'm much less open as scum and I'm always worried about what I'm saying being scummy whereas as town I don't really care as much if I sound scummy. And also as scum I struggle to come up with my own pushes and sometimes and I think it shows.
In post 1432, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:I don't remember saying I was okay with sacrificing Shelly but there was a lot of suspicion on that slot so even if I read it as town I'd have been fine with the elimination. I did consistently read her as scummy-appearing town. It's still interesting how easy that elimination went through when there wasn't much of a push.
It may go against the grain, but I like this response. I was asking Raya this question as if she was scum sacrificing her scumbuddy and she answered it oblivious to the reasoning behind the question. If you are faking this response Raya, then kudos to you.
Oh I thought you meant sacrifice as in eliminate since I had a townread on her.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1435 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 5:37 pm

Post by Looker »

  • Is Nosferatu still here?

In post 1420, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1327, Looker wrote:
In post 1307, Raya36 wrote: Those were two different situations though. I didn't think what Walter was pushing at the time was PR fishing and his pushed were weak. This is a completely difference instant.
I'm getting things confused. Which post numbers were for which instances?
So this is what Walter was pushing as PR fishing: . It was just a joke, not PR pushing at all. And I think it was scummy of Walter to push it as PR fishing.
This is RCE's fakeclaim that I'm scumreading: .
  • Where was Walter pushing this?
  • Post 192 is a Gamma Emerald post, not a fakeclaim from RCE
In post 1426, geraintm wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 1416, Looker wrote:Why would you assume your reasoning is different from everyone else's? How willing would you be to eliminate Raya


i usually take an odd look at games. the way i get reads on people is usually from a different direction to mostpeople

i did look at raya in my post 1037. they looked suspicious, but from a point of view of looking for them to be scum. i havent done a full depth dive at everything raya has posted yet. i wouldnt vote for them yet, i dont want to move my vote right now
How close to deadline are you willing to wait before the move? What are your opinions on Gamma Emerald's, ItalianoVD's, and Frogsterking's votes?
User avatar
Tayl0r Swift
Tayl0r Swift
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Tayl0r Swift
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4639
Joined: August 27, 2020

Post Post #1436 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 5:48 pm

Post by Tayl0r Swift »

In post 1434, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1432, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1366, ItalianoVD wrote:@Raya: Your responses to my questions seem very townie looking at face value. I can’t know if this is your meta or not. Why do you feel it was okay to sacrifice shelly?
I feel like from my perspective I usually come across quite townie when I actually try as town. I wish I could give this game that effort right now. As scum I tend to be pretty obvious, I come across as unnatural and it's easy to see through my plans. Of course scum always feel like their scummy so maybe I'm not as bad at scum as I think?
Without knowing how you actually play as both alignments it’s hard to know what you mean by “obvious” and “unnatural”. What differences are there or can be seen when you are “trying as town” as opposed to not trying?
Honestly I'm not too sure but when I was more active over the summer I noticed that I was getting correctly townread quite a bit and they were usually voiced to be strong townreads. I think a part of it is as town I'll be very transparent, ask players lots of questions, genuinely try to be engaged and post lots. I'm much less open as scum and I'm always worried about what I'm saying being scummy whereas as town I don't really care as much if I sound scummy. And also as scum I struggle to come up with my own pushes and sometimes and I think it shows.
In post 1432, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:I don't remember saying I was okay with sacrificing Shelly but there was a lot of suspicion on that slot so even if I read it as town I'd have been fine with the elimination. I did consistently read her as scummy-appearing town. It's still interesting how easy that elimination went through when there wasn't much of a push.
It may go against the grain, but I like this response. I was asking Raya this question as if she was scum sacrificing her scumbuddy and she answered it oblivious to the reasoning behind the question. If you are faking this response Raya, then kudos to you.
Oh I thought you meant sacrifice as in eliminate since I had a townread on her.
i read over a couple of your towngames, and i have to say that this feels different than those other games. youve been pretty absent here and havent committed to any pushes.
User avatar
Nosferatu
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Nosferatu
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7726
Joined: June 23, 2015
Location: Geek U.S.A.

Post Post #1437 (ISO) » Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:37 pm

Post by Nosferatu »

In post 1435, Looker wrote:Is Nosferatu still here?
a little bored but still here
BRASIL BRASIL BRASIL BRRRRR
last.fm
gtkas
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #1438 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 12:53 am

Post by Raya36 »

In post 1435, Looker wrote:
In post 1420, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1327, Looker wrote:
In post 1307, Raya36 wrote: Those were two different situations though. I didn't think what Walter was pushing at the time was PR fishing and his pushed were weak. This is a completely difference instant.
I'm getting things confused. Which post numbers were for which instances?
So this is what Walter was pushing as PR fishing: . It was just a joke, not PR pushing at all. And I think it was scummy of Walter to push it as PR fishing.
This is RCE's fakeclaim that I'm scumreading: .
  • Where was Walter pushing this?
  • Post 192 is a Gamma Emerald post, not a fakeclaim from RCE
Oops

Looks like we both got confused. This was the fake claim he pushes. It was clearly fake and a joke because Nos just asked for someone to fake a guilty since they were bored. Then Walter quickly backs off when some of us disagree.


For Walter: , ,
User avatar
Raya36
Raya36
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Raya36
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4661
Joined: May 22, 2017

Post Post #1439 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 12:57 am

Post by Raya36 »

In post 1436, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 1434, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1432, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:
In post 1366, ItalianoVD wrote:@Raya: Your responses to my questions seem very townie looking at face value. I can’t know if this is your meta or not. Why do you feel it was okay to sacrifice shelly?
I feel like from my perspective I usually come across quite townie when I actually try as town. I wish I could give this game that effort right now. As scum I tend to be pretty obvious, I come across as unnatural and it's easy to see through my plans. Of course scum always feel like their scummy so maybe I'm not as bad at scum as I think?
Without knowing how you actually play as both alignments it’s hard to know what you mean by “obvious” and “unnatural”. What differences are there or can be seen when you are “trying as town” as opposed to not trying?
Honestly I'm not too sure but when I was more active over the summer I noticed that I was getting correctly townread quite a bit and they were usually voiced to be strong townreads. I think a part of it is as town I'll be very transparent, ask players lots of questions, genuinely try to be engaged and post lots. I'm much less open as scum and I'm always worried about what I'm saying being scummy whereas as town I don't really care as much if I sound scummy. And also as scum I struggle to come up with my own pushes and sometimes and I think it shows.
In post 1432, ItalianoVD wrote:
In post 1405, Raya36 wrote:I don't remember saying I was okay with sacrificing Shelly but there was a lot of suspicion on that slot so even if I read it as town I'd have been fine with the elimination. I did consistently read her as scummy-appearing town. It's still interesting how easy that elimination went through when there wasn't much of a push.
It may go against the grain, but I like this response. I was asking Raya this question as if she was scum sacrificing her scumbuddy and she answered it oblivious to the reasoning behind the question. If you are faking this response Raya, then kudos to you.
Oh I thought you meant sacrifice as in eliminate since I had a townread on her.
i read over a couple of your towngames, and i have to say that this feels different than those other games. youve been pretty absent here and havent committed to any pushes.
I definitely agree that my play is very different this game and honestly more reflective of my scum game than my town game but it's not because I'm scum. Univeriery just started and it's all online (I'm in 7 courses) which I'm not used to so I needed to adjust to that the first couple weeks but now that I'm more adjusted I'm finding a bit more time to post. So hopefully that explains why I'm a bit more detached than usual.
User avatar
GeorgeBailey
GeorgeBailey
He/Him
GeorgeBailey
User avatar
User avatar
GeorgeBailey
He/Him
GeorgeBailey
GeorgeBailey
Posts: 3431
Joined: September 23, 2019
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: GeorgeBailey

Post Post #1440 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:21 am

Post by GeorgeBailey »

Votecount 2.11

RCEnigma(4)
~ (63), (39), (88), (51)

Raya36(4)
~ (52), (28), (34), (23)
Looker(1)
~ (45)
Frogsterking(1)
~ (71)
callforjudgement(1)
~ (72)


Not Voting (0):

With 11 alive it takes 6 to eliminate.

Day 2 deadline is in (expired on 2020-09-22 17:44:55)
GeorgeBailey
User avatar
Frogsterking
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6935
Joined: June 20, 2011
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Pond

Post Post #1441 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:18 am

Post by Frogsterking »

In post 1428, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1427, Frogsterking wrote:That sounds unbalanced. Surely there can be a way to balance a 9-4.
There is. Make the setup 10-3.
I was thinking a vig, a couple different investigatives, a watcher or a doctor or both, additionally some kind of alternative pr like a day messager, vs a role blocker and three goons. Something like that.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
User avatar
Frogsterking
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6935
Joined: June 20, 2011
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Pond

Post Post #1442 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:22 am

Post by Frogsterking »

Also I feel like it's getting close to time for Raya to claim.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
User avatar
callforjudgement
callforjudgement
Microprocessor
User avatar
User avatar
callforjudgement
Microprocessor
Microprocessor
Posts: 3972
Joined: September 1, 2011

Post Post #1443 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:27 am

Post by callforjudgement »

In post 1441, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 1428, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1427, Frogsterking wrote:That sounds unbalanced. Surely there can be a way to balance a 9-4.
There is. Make the setup 10-3.
I was thinking a vig, a couple different investigatives, a watcher or a doctor or both, additionally some kind of alternative pr like a day messager, vs a role blocker and three goons. Something like that.
You can create a setup that's win/loss balanced along those lines, but it'd be no fun to play. Either you get saved by the power roles and town wins, or you don't and scum wins. A VT would have very little influence over how the game went.
scum
· scam · seam · team · term · tern · torn ·
town
User avatar
WaltertheDunce10
WaltertheDunce10
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WaltertheDunce10
Goon
Goon
Posts: 798
Joined: June 13, 2020
Location: Redneck California

Post Post #1444 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:18 am

Post by WaltertheDunce10 »

In post 1437, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 1435, Looker wrote:Is Nosferatu still here?
a little bored but still here
Alive
User avatar
Frogsterking
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6935
Joined: June 20, 2011
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Pond

Post Post #1445 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:30 am

Post by Frogsterking »

In post 1443, callforjudgement wrote:
In post 1441, Frogsterking wrote:
In post 1428, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1427, Frogsterking wrote:That sounds unbalanced. Surely there can be a way to balance a 9-4.
There is. Make the setup 10-3.
I was thinking a vig, a couple different investigatives, a watcher or a doctor or both, additionally some kind of alternative pr like a day messager, vs a role blocker and three goons. Something like that.
You can create a setup that's win/loss balanced along those lines, but it'd be no fun to play. Either you get saved by the power roles and town wins, or you don't and scum wins. A VT would have very little influence over how the game went.
I was thinking that as well.

To be fun and balanced the best try seems no VTs, 4-5 power roles, 4-5 unusual and impactful town roles (like the day messager), vs a power scum and three goons.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
User avatar
Frogsterking
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Frogsterking
He/him
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6935
Joined: June 20, 2011
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Pond

Post Post #1446 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:44 am

Post by Frogsterking »

Also I read through that 9-4 game and I can see how it left a bad taste in everyone's mouth.
Bruce: Terry. I've been thinking about something you once told me... and you were wrong. It's not Batman that makes you worthwhile; it's the other way around. Never tell yourself anything different.
Terry: ...Thanks.
User avatar
WaltertheDunce10
WaltertheDunce10
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
WaltertheDunce10
Goon
Goon
Posts: 798
Joined: June 13, 2020
Location: Redneck California

Post Post #1447 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 6:45 am

Post by WaltertheDunce10 »

K so pretty much has to be a 10-3
RCe why are you still selfvoting?
User avatar
Tayl0r Swift
Tayl0r Swift
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Tayl0r Swift
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4639
Joined: August 27, 2020

Post Post #1448 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 7:33 am

Post by Tayl0r Swift »

In post 1442, Frogsterking wrote:Also I feel like it's getting close to time for Raya to claim.
you arent even on the wagon and it isnt at L-1....
User avatar
geraintm
geraintm
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
geraintm
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5841
Joined: March 9, 2006
Location: Wales

Post Post #1449 (ISO) » Sun Sep 20, 2020 8:33 am

Post by geraintm »

In post 1448, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 1442, Frogsterking wrote:Also I feel like it's getting close to time for Raya to claim.
you arent even on the wagon and it isnt at L-1....[/quote

]
I said something similar a few days ago. I didn't say claim, I just said that the day seems to be drifting towards their lynch and they should probably try and alter the course if they didn't want to get killed.

Don't think you hassled me over my post though :/

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”