then we all vote that person.
If that person is bad - yay win!
If that person is good, we all fear-target whoever was wrong about that person originally.
do you want to use the sword?In post 301, Random Canadian wrote:Well I feel that's a better plan than by vote counts.
Not really but if I did right now it would towards you as you are the top of my list. Not sure enough to use the sword thoughIn post 305, Kerset wrote:do you want to use the sword?In post 301, Random Canadian wrote:Well I feel that's a better plan than by vote counts.
I'm just acknowledging the post p muchIn post 260, Lost wrote:Huh?In post 249, Gamma Emerald wrote:HuhIn post 239, Lost wrote:scum have daychat, he would boop in thereIn post 227, Gamma Emerald wrote:I like this idea but it's also a good cover if scum to set up quickhammers in ExLoIn post 217, Sirius9121 wrote:FYI ‘boop’ is declaring my presence so people who have questions directed at me can ask
Is there any way to insulate for that possibility?
In post 276, Donempire wrote:Just modkill scum pls
that thing about the first post seems sensibleIn post 279, Donempire wrote:I'll try.
Spoiler: kerset
First post of his is a one liner taking a jab at how we're solving. I dont think scum has this mindset, and scum!kerset would definitely want to keep us running in circleswhen it came to mechanics instead of abruptly telling everyone to get their act together.
The second post is a fluff post and the third a response to sirius, done in quick succession, and i want to point this out as an example of his tone in the game rather than use these quotes at face value. The way he goes about approaching the game care freely as evident by his contentless posts sometimes but still moving the game forward when he sees fit gives me soft town vibes.
Thats all. Probably a bit weak, but so is my read so i'd be content if you can only understand my perspective even if you dont end up tring kerset.
Umlaut, are you okay with lynching in my proposed 3?
this just feels like a shortcut to eliminating 2 townsIn post 300, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:someone who feels SUPER SURE that someone else is bad does
SWORD OF DESTINY: ___
then we all vote that person.
If that person is bad - yay win!
If that person is good, we all fear-target whoever was wrong about that person originally.
just get it right thenIn post 315, Gamma Emerald wrote:yeah and scum very likely aren't going to be the ones to submit, so that means unless we want 2 town to die the one submitting has to get it right
It's like you're in my head :OIn post 320, Random Canadian wrote:Ari- Don't have much to say about Ari. Most of his posts don't add much, but I think this comes from him being more busy outside of the game than trying to lurk. I think they were really interested in the fear aspect of this setup but was disappointed that our group was not as into speculating on fears as the last group was, which may have helped him check out of this game.
Because here donge was asking what Umlaut what they thought about the three that he had made a case on. I've been having a hard time reading people this game so have a set three seemed less daunting to look through at the moment.In post 279, Donempire wrote:Umlaut, are you okay with lynching in my proposed 3?