Newbie 656 Game Over!

[RandomGem]

I think I'm going to put Drifter at L-2. Not only his "The mafia don't know if I'm a power-role" backtracking after claiming vanilla borders on fishing, his general unhelpfulness and lack of scumhunting rivals that of RandomGem.

That's hurtful.

[lifeofpie]

Random hasn't been that bad...


Random at least seems to put in some readable, understandable comments.

[Drifter]

I think I'm going to put Drifter at L-2. Not only his "The mafia don't know if I'm a power-role" backtracking after claiming vanilla borders on fishing, his general unhelpfulness and lack of scumhunting rivals that of RandomGem.

Unvote; vote Drifter

Some questions for Drifter:
1. Why did you ask about a deadline in 134, when you were already told the answer in 75?
2. Who do you find most suspcious? Why?
3. What is the meaning/purpose of your 192? The only thing I see coming out it is major WIFOM.

ah not the deadline thing again, from what I can remember I wasn't given a clear answer the first time. I was told that there MAY be a deadline so excuse me for wanting to have all the information.

As I have said I suspect life of pie for IMMEDIATELY starting a bandwagon on me. So as I used the wrong word last time:

vote life of pie

As for people being sus of Fenchurch, wel I understand 'trust nobody' but tbh I'm not really sus of her. In fact I would say she is the closest to a confirmed innocent we have.

Your complaining about my play, wel choose who you want to vote off and we will see who has been more useful for the townies when I end up lynching a mafia and all of you end up voting off an innocent (which will happen if you vote me off). Then I will be able to complain about your poor play. Why not take it just a little less seriously tho, it is supposed to be fun amirite?

[RandomGem]

Random hasn't been that bad...


Random at least seems to put in some readable, understandable comments.

Buddying up?

Mallick has replaced Sion. But I haven't seen him post. So I'm gonna vote for him.

Vote: Mallick

Unofficial

Vote Count as of Post 202

Drifter (3):

lifeofpie, ShadowLurker, Artem

thinktank (1):

Fenchurch

Fenchurch (1):

Chapter 5

lifeofpie (1):

Drifter

Mallick (1):

RandomGem

Not voting (2)

thinktank, Mallick

[RandomGem]

EBWOP: Silly me, that unofficial votecount goes to post 203.

[thinktank]

Fenchruch, I become increasingly more suspicious of you especially as you have a tendency to distort what people say and make it sound scummy. For example, I don't know how you got "Verbose posts are a scum tell" from my post. I said verbose posts under pressure are often times a bad thing because it comes of as defensive. Not that all verbose posts are bad. What you've stated is a gross distortion of my statement and thats a scum tell.

FoS: Fenchurch

[Fenchurch]

I said verbose posts under pressure are often times a bad thing because it comes of as defensive.

Your choice of wording is still fuzzy and ambiguous to me. Does your opinion differ from Artem's (post 185), and if so, how?
Do you maintain that being defensive is a scumtell?

And "tendency" is a bit strong; this if the first time that I have tried to look for other meanings in what a player has said.

[lifeofpie]

As I have said I suspect life of pie for IMMEDIATELY starting a bandwagon on me. So as I used the wrong word last time:

vote life of pie

I have already addressed this (I think).

Random hasn't been that bad...


Random at least seems to put in some readable, understandable comments.

Buddying up?

Not you too?! I am merely posting my own, not-so professional opinion. Shut up. Your posts suck, everything you post is scummy, (especially that votecount) and your grammer would kill your mother if she ever saw such filth.

Mallick has replaced Sion. But I haven't seen him post. So I'm gonna vote for him.

Vote: Mallick

Um, why again? Since when is that a reason? We should only go after lurkers (we don't even know if he might be having computer problems) if we really have nothing else to go on.

[shaft.ed]

Vote Count as of Post 207

Drifter (3):

lifeofpie, ShadowLurker, Artem

thinktank (1):

Fenchurch

Fenchurch (1):

Chapter 5

lifeofpie (1):

Drifter

Mallick (1):

RandomGem

Not voting (2)

thinktank, Mallick

[lifeofpie]

Think, shouldn't you be using your power of vote?

[RandomGem]

Random hasn't been that bad...


Random at least seems to put in some readable, understandable comments.

Buddying up?

Not you too?! I am merely posting my own, not-so professional opinion. Shut up. Your posts suck, everything you post is scummy, (especially that votecount) and your grammer would kill your mother if she ever saw such filth.

Only kidding...

Mallick has replaced Sion. But I haven't seen him post. So I'm gonna vote for him.

Vote: Mallick

Um, why again? Since when is that a reason? We should only go after lurkers (we don't even know if he might be having computer problems) if we really have nothing else to go on.

I'm not trying to lynch him. I'm just trying to put some pressure on him to get him to post.

[chapter 5]

I'm having second thoughts about Fenchurch, but I'm going to keep my vote on for now. I just can't read the other players with enough tenacity yet -- give me a little while longer to root through some posts.

[lifeofpie]

Random hasn't been that bad...


Random at least seems to put in some readable, understandable comments.

Buddying up?

Not you too?! I am merely posting my own, not-so professional opinion. Shut up. Your posts suck, everything you post is scummy, (especially that votecount) and your grammer would kill your mother if she ever saw such filth.

Only kidding...

Me too.

Mallick has replaced Sion. But I haven't seen him post. So I'm gonna vote for him.

Vote: Mallick

Um, why again? Since when is that a reason? We should only go after lurkers (we don't even know if he might be having computer problems) if we really have nothing else to go on.

I'm not trying to lynch him. I'm just trying to put some pressure on him to get him to post.

Eh, I really don't have faith in this system. One vote doesn't really do much in this situation, plus we don't even know if he has access to the boards.

[lifeofpie]

EBWOP: Wheeeeeeeeee! Quotefest!

[ShadowLurker]

shaft,ed any news on a replacement for Mallick?

Artem putting his vote on Drifter is very interesting for me, as they're both in my top three for scum (the last one, Mallick, not being here)

[Artem]

Artem putting his vote on Drifter is very interesting for me, as they're both in my top three for scum (the last one, Mallick, not being here)

I'm not too fond of players that say "This is interesting..." because it's an attempt to fabricate suspicion without explicit listing of reasons.

If you find me voting Drifter suspicious, then please explain why and address my reasons for voting and Drifter's responses.

@Drifter: Why do you think fenchurch is the closest to a confirmed townie we have?

[NabakovNabakov]

Hey everybody, I'm back. Big round of applause for Shaft.ed!

[ShadowLurker]

Artem putting his vote on Drifter is very interesting for me, as they're both in my top three for scum (the last one, Mallick, not being here)

I'm not too fond of players that say "This is interesting..." because it's an attempt to fabricate suspicion without explicit listing of reasons.

If you find me voting Drifter suspicious, then please explain why and address my reasons for voting and Drifter's responses.

Way to put words in my mouth.

[Artem]

Artem putting his vote on Drifter is very interesting for me, as they're both in my top three for scum (the last one, Mallick, not being here)

I'm not too fond of players that say "This is interesting..." because it's an attempt to fabricate suspicion without explicit listing of reasons.

If you find me voting Drifter suspicious, then please explain why and address my reasons for voting and Drifter's responses.

Way to put words in my mouth.

All the more reason behind why you shouldn't be making such open-ended statements such as "<This and this> is interesting...".

In my (somewhat limited) experience, players use such phrases to cast suspicion on other players without providing any reason behind the suspicion itself.

If your interest is not suspicion, then please elaborate also.

[Fenchurch]

Welcome back NabNab, and thanks shaft.ed for covering

. It has been a week since Mallick replaced in and he still hasn't posted anything, could we get an update on his status, possibly another replacement? I know shaft.ed mentioned sending out a prod, was this picked up?

[Fenchurch]

@Fenchurch: Buddying up? If you don't like compliments, I'll change my tune.
Your avatar sucks horribly. The angle of it is all wrong, plus I hate that hat. Also, your long posts are exceedingly annoying.

Not you too?! I am merely posting my own, not-so professional opinion. Shut up. Your posts suck, everything you post is scummy, (especially that votecount) and your grammer would kill your mother if she ever saw such filth.

I don't know whether to read much into it.. but lifeofpie's reaction to the buddying up suggestion seems a little over-the-top to me. My initial accusation was a weak one, and I think a response of "I was just being friendly" would have sufficed. But this switch to posting insults looks a little like trying to cover up the previous behaviour.
At any rate, the "joke" response to RandomGem is rude and inappropriate, not especially funny.

[shaft.ed]

shaft,ed any news on a replacement for Mallick?

Mallick picked up his prod the day I sent it. Thanks for the thanks NabNab

[chapter 5]

Welcome back NabNab, and thanks shaft.ed for covering

. It has been a week since Mallick replaced in and he still hasn't posted anything, could we get an update on his status, possibly another replacement? I know shaft.ed mentioned sending out a prod, was this picked up?

Totally agree with this.

[NabakovNabakov]

Vote Count as of Post 222

Drifter (3):

lifeofpie, ShadowLurker, Artem

thinktank (1):

Fenchurch

Fenchurch (1):

Chapter 5

lifeofpie (1):

Drifter

Mallick (1):

RandomGem

Not voting (2)

thinktank, Mallick

Mallick is receiving his final warning.

[ShadowLurker]

Artem putting his vote on Drifter is very interesting for me, as they're both in my top three for scum (the last one, Mallick, not being here)

I'm not too fond of players that say "This is interesting..." because it's an attempt to fabricate suspicion without explicit listing of reasons.

If you find me voting Drifter suspicious, then please explain why and address my reasons for voting and Drifter's responses.

Way to put words in my mouth.

All the more reason behind why you shouldn't be making such open-ended statements such as "<This and this> is interesting...".

In my (somewhat limited) experience, players use such phrases to cast suspicion on other players without providing any reason behind the suspicion itself.

If your interest is not suspicion, then please elaborate also.

It's exactly what I said it was. It's interesting, not suspicious or townie, something to revisit once we have more information.

@Fenchurch: Buddying up? If you don't like compliments, I'll change my tune.
Your avatar sucks horribly. The angle of it is all wrong, plus I hate that hat. Also, your long posts are exceedingly annoying.

Not you too?! I am merely posting my own, not-so professional opinion. Shut up. Your posts suck, everything you post is scummy, (especially that votecount) and your grammer would kill your mother if she ever saw such filth.

I don't know whether to read much into it.. but lifeofpie's reaction to the buddying up suggestion seems a little over-the-top to me. My initial accusation was a weak one, and I think a response of "I was just being friendly" would have sufficed. But this switch to posting insults looks a little like trying to cover up the previous behaviour.
At any rate, the "joke" response to RandomGem is rude and inappropriate, not especially funny.

lifeofpie was obviously distancing.