So you're saying you think my reactions are weird but you don't know if it's actually scum indicative?
I like that train of thought, hard to fake as scum.
Vanderscamp - Bugspray are town to me so far.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
I don't think I've ever played with anybody in this game except Farren, so I have no clue, but I tend to agree.
Posts like this:
In post 173, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Mystic Bear, an player i do not trust to be town, asks me to sheep them on an townblock i do not understand.
I know i am town so that means for their stated townblock to succeed it must have exactly the 2 scum that aren't me outside of the block.
Which are logical but also completely unhelpful just strike me as content for the sake of trying to look analytical.
If Norwegian plays like this as town though, please let me know since that's useful info!
Replace out one of those useless inactive noobs in the proposed townblock of Bear with Bugspray and i might gradually warm up to it.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 176, Vanderscamp wrote:Which are logical but also completely unhelpful just strike me as content for the sake of trying to look analytical.
If Norwegian plays like this as town though, please let me know since that's useful info!
I do play like this as town.
Sorry, i'd let Pooky answer, but he doesn't want anything that proves i'm not scum to leak out into the press.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 175, NorwegianboyEE wrote:So you're saying you think my reactions are weird but you don't know if it's actually scum indicative?
I like that train of thought, hard to fake as scum.
Vanderscamp - Bugspray are town to me so far.
No, sorry for the misunderstanding, I think your posts have been very scum indicative, unless this turns out to actually be your style as both alignments (which I think is likely not the case)
I very rarely get reads this strong this early on D1 but I think you've been extremely scummy so far.
how is bugspray town when they havent even posted game related things yet but u still cant properly sort us?
retired
"1 thing I will give you Dk, I think you are very good at manipulating. I don't mean that in a bad way, I just think you [have] this way with yourself. You know what to say and when to say [it]." ~VFP
"Koba doesn't really have a scumrange/townrange, Koba will kill your pet cat to win a game" ~Pooky
My scum indicative play is to just not play.
It's the opposite of what i'm doing here.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 180, DkKoba wrote:how is bugspray town when they havent even posted game related things yet but u still cant properly sort us?
Because you still haven't linked me that game.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
I originally just put MB in my coalition as a positive retaliation for doing it for me, but I actually have a light town read there even barring the associative read of MB being very likely town if Norwegian is scum.
In post 181, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My scum indicative play is to just not play.
It's the opposite of what i'm doing here.
imagine wanting to get townread for
playing the game
smh
It's true though, if i had rolled scum here i probably would have just lurked it out because it's taxing.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Norwegian, I like your reactions to me more than your reactions to MB.
What would help me is if you explained why you would care in the slightest what MB's "reasoning" for the initial coalition was, when I feel like it's pretty obvious that there was no real reasoning.
In post 190, Vanderscamp wrote:Norwegian, I like your reactions to me more than your reactions to MB.
What would help me is if you explained why you would care in the slightest what MB's "reasoning" for the initial coalition was, when I feel like it's pretty obvious that there was no real reasoning.
In post 190, Vanderscamp wrote:Norwegian, I like your reactions to me more than your reactions to MB.
What would help me is if you explained why you would care in the slightest what MB's "reasoning" for the initial coalition was, when I feel like it's pretty obvious that there was no real reasoning.
Also, can you link me your most recent town game?
If there's "no reasoning" behind their coalition then i do not understand what the point is. It's like going for a random elimination in day 1. Just why?
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 190, Vanderscamp wrote:Norwegian, I like your reactions to me more than your reactions to MB.
What would help me is if you explained why you would care in the slightest what MB's "reasoning" for the initial coalition was, when I feel like it's pretty obvious that there was no real reasoning.
Thanks MB!
I don't think Norwee sounds remotely as awkward in that game as he does here.
Obviously I know his alignment in that one but it seems very different, the stuff I'm seeing and not liking doesn't seem to be there, at all.
Not that Norwee was particularly unserious in that game, but this game he's ramped the seriousness up to 11.
It's a no brainer that suggesting and pushing a solve based on nothing is a bad idea, and i think if they are town they would have realized that.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 190, Vanderscamp wrote:Norwegian, I like your reactions to me more than your reactions to MB.
What would help me is if you explained why you would care in the slightest what MB's "reasoning" for the initial coalition was, when I feel like it's pretty obvious that there was no real reasoning.
Thanks MB!
I don't think Norwee sounds remotely as awkward in that game as he does here.
Obviously I know his alignment in that one but it seems very different, the stuff I'm seeing and not liking doesn't seem to be there, at all.
Not that Norwee was particularly unserious in that game, but this game he's ramped the seriousness up to 11.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 190, Vanderscamp wrote:Norwegian, I like your reactions to me more than your reactions to MB.
What would help me is if you explained why you would care in the slightest what MB's "reasoning" for the initial coalition was, when I feel like it's pretty obvious that there was no real reasoning.
Also, can you link me your most recent town game?
If there's "no reasoning" behind their coalition then i do not understand what the point is. It's like going for a random elimination in day 1. Just why?
Why not?
I'm not sure what meta votes are called on this site, but surely they exist. It's the same as that concept.
And even if you genuinely don't understand why anyone would do it, I still have issues with you trying to get to the bottom of the clearly non-existent reasoning for it.