"Let us say that you are right and there are two worlds. How much, then, is this 'other world' worth to you? What do you have there that you do not have here? Money? Power? Something worth causing the prince so much pain for?'"
"Well, I..."
"What? Nothing? You would make the prince suffer over... nothing?"
In post 3401, Noraa wrote:Italicizing is not necessary. I would argue the asterisks however, definitely are.
So says the precedent for leaving formatting in the hands of the recipient
Edit: This is entirely inaccurate. The precedent is actually that multiple good suggestions lead to mastina offering all of them and was set with monty, although mastina did say if someone asked for a capitalization based title change she would likely grant it in reference to Noraa's title.
Last edited by Jingle on Thu Mar 25, 2021 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In post 3401, Noraa wrote:Italicizing is not necessary. I would argue the asterisks however, definitely are.
So says the precedent for leaving formatting in the hands of the recipient
Edit: This is entirely inaccurate. The precedent is actually that multiple good suggestions lead to mastina offering all of them and was set with monty, although mastina did say if someone asked for a capitalization based title change she would likely grant it in reference to Noraa's title.
Don't trust Jingle, he's a lyre.
I've only made one good post, and don't you dare accuse me of doing it again.
In post 3401, Noraa wrote:Italicizing is not necessary. I would argue the asterisks however, definitely are.
So says the precedent for leaving formatting in the hands of the recipient
Edit: This is entirely inaccurate. The precedent is actually that multiple good suggestions lead to mastina offering all of them and was set with monty, although mastina did say if someone asked for a capitalization based title change she would likely grant it in reference to Noraa's title.
Don't trust Jingle, he's a lyre.
We didn't make the lyre
It was always singing since the strings were ringing
I've consistently seen solid setups come from Gypyx, but they all have one thing in common. They're all super complicated. Even operating within the bounds of 'Normal' Gypyx routinely pushes the line and does things no one expects. Also, something something Draft Mafia.
I've consistently seen solid setups come from Gypyx, but they all have one thing in common. They're all super complicated. Even operating within the bounds of 'Normal' Gypyx routinely pushes the line and does things no one expects. Also, something something Draft Mafia.
That isnt really unique to them per se. For example I have also been borderlining the normap guidelines for my setups.
"Am I a ghost like you, caught between the seams of two intertwining melodies?"
Sure. So did skygazer, and a bunch of other people.
But I think Complex Draft is a title that IS unique to Gypyx because of both his propensity to complex setup design and his work with the drafting mechanic for his game and wouldn't fit you or skygazer or whoever else because of that. It's the overlapping of the two that made me want to nom him for it.
