[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 12652681 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1000: Names on the List v1.01 [game over!] - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #81 (isolation #1) » Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:09 am
Postby Ythan »
In post 32, mozamis wrote:Soft town read on DKK, based on her posting quite freely and seemingly without fear. But yeah, this early on I'd rather lynch anyone outside of Moz, Dunn, Dkk.
The geriatric ruleset is not a ruleset I am familiar without, and one I believe I should not fall foul of regardless. I am familiar with the Not_Mafia ruleset, however, and that E-2 should be considered NM-1
While I would be more than happy to invite The White Rabbit to the party, I do believe that you are running late. VOTE: mozamis
I townread mozamis but Hatter's vote is the only one that strikes me as scummy
So you do care to elaborate, just not to myself. The Hatter will remember this.
Interesting that you're familiar with N_M, yet two out of your three posts are simply asking him if he "cares to elaborate", do you have any other thoughts on the game so far?
-Jimothy
I fear your mathematical skills are skewed. I have made 1 post asking for explanation, not two, and N_M will elaborate and enlighten on occasion if their read is significant enough to warrant it. As it stands, it was not.
My thoughts on the game so far are few, the post restriction mechanic is an interesting one that appears to have evoked several differing playstyles and I am eager to see where this will turn the game. The negative reads upon me amuse me, but do not concern me. That Mozamies considers me nervous is far from the truth, as I am nothing less than indifferent at this time. The he considers me contrived, is quite the accurate estimation given the language, structure and tone of the posts I create. Anyone who has entered into a game with myself prior to this will affirm this is NAI, and simply my standard methodology.
I do wish to challenge anyone whom believes they are capable of mimicking my verbosity and lingual tomfoolery - without sounding contrived - to certainly attempt so.
32 doesn't feel like a natural thought to me and 33 is jumpy. But then Hatter made a big fluffy 39 and jumped on the Moz wagon in a way I didn't like, then made another big fluffy and very self focused 70 I didn't like either.
32 doesn't feel like a natural thought to me and 33 is jumpy. But then Hatter made a big fluffy 39 and jumped on the Moz wagon in a way I didn't like, then made another big fluffy and very self focused 70 I didn't like either.
did your early ping on hatter influence your moz read?
I would say muddied. The fact that part of the Hatter read is for a questionable vote on Moz.
Post
Post #117 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 15, 2021 6:58 pm
Postby Ythan »
In post 116, Michael Scott wrote:@Ythan: have you checked Koba's link? Does that influence your read anyhow?
I have not. I don't enjoy reading through games I'm not playing it. Since it's in relation to a playstyle thing though I will get around to it eventually.
Would still eliminate Hatter too but I'll take either.
Thanks for the devastating analysis. Any reasons?
I've been scumreading you since post 32 as I pointed out in post 81 and explained in post 109. You've spent a week since then posting fluff. Hatter wagon isn't going anywhere right now.
Post
Post #239 (isolation #15) » Sat Mar 20, 2021 5:08 pm
Postby Ythan »
In post 237, DkKoba wrote:hi sorry, epicmafia literally dissolved today(the site doesnt exist) and I have a whole community to help restructure on the forum maf side so i will not be active much for the next 48 hours
Oh wow I'm surprised I didn't hear anything on our discussion side.
In post 243, Ythan wrote:It is unfortunate that you have turned on Hatter right as I shifted my vote to you while still agitating for their elimination.
You did make me think about Hatter.
You up for a Hatter elim? I'm certainly up for getting something going, no one seems interested in your elim. VOTE: MAD HATTERS TEA PARTY
Feel bad, 'cos I like his style, but ultimately very little content from him and a LOT of evasive answers.
Post
Post #248 (isolation #18) » Sat Mar 20, 2021 9:23 pm
Postby Ythan »
Like when I said "it is unfortunate" I meant it looked scummy but you don't seem to have picked up on that and just jumped in headfirst. You had Hatter in your town bloc ~13 hours ago what suddenly flipped that?
Post
Post #282 (isolation #23) » Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:13 pm
Postby Ythan »
In post 279, Rathe wrote:y do u care u wanted to vote mad hatter what about my other reasons
I was about to drop it but the fuck? I'm not gonna just ignore everything you do because you're voting one of my scumreads. You know better than that I think.
Post
Post #287 (isolation #24) » Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:35 pm
Postby Ythan »
In post 279, Rathe wrote:y do u care u wanted to vote mad hatter what about my other reasons
I took a breath here's a different answer.
I don't think they're scum together and I think Moz is worse, so I'd prefer to dangle Moz. I say this before digesting those four new Moz posts though.
Post
Post #354 (isolation #33) » Fri Mar 26, 2021 8:16 am
Postby Ythan »
The way I see it I have a 50/50 chance of hitting scum on the list but I'm still more confident just voting you. I intend to review Michael and Rathe though before I do that.
Post
Post #461 (isolation #42) » Thu Apr 01, 2021 10:07 am
Postby Ythan »
Okay so I've actually continued to have a very busy week but I'm finally off today and will have some time at some point to do something other than just unwind from work ie I need to read the off-list Hatter alternatives and I think I also got asked another question or two at some point.
Post
Post #540 (isolation #50) » Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:14 pm
Postby Ythan »
I looked at Michael (having earlier reviewed Hatter) and Hatter is scummier than Michael. That leaves Rathe. I also intend to do another skim of Hatter after learning their secret identity.
