i guess if i have to be the one to say it.In post 1048, Sigmund wrote:why not sang froid?
moon seems to have indicated that sang froid is her partner.
i guess if i have to be the one to say it.In post 1048, Sigmund wrote:why not sang froid?
I will be online before deadline to move vote if we need itIn post 900, Datisi wrote:9 hours, 18 minutes.
i consider it a towntell (i.e. more likely to come from town than scum), but here's the key point: thereIn post 1053, Moongrass wrote:Like what do you think I was doing?
I don't think that was meant as a crumb of sang-slot being the partner. Seems pretty foolhardy from Moongrass to out their partner that obviously.In post 1050, northsidegal wrote:i guess if i have to be the one to say it.In post 1048, Sigmund wrote:why not sang froid?
moon seems to have indicated that sang froid is her partner.
So the play makes no sense. it doesn't mean I'm scum, my actions weren't sensical as any alignment. I was trying to test two things - if you'd catch it and what you did either way. I then picked you for scum because you didn't seem to get it or read me based on it, and then I left it to pursue other people because you weren't a D1 lim anyway.In post 1054, northsidegal wrote:i consider it a towntell (i.e. more likely to come from town than scum), but here's the key point: thereIn post 1053, Moongrass wrote:Like what do you think I was doing?areplausible narratives for doing what you did as scum, but idon'treally see a plausible narrative for doing what you did if there was any chance you thought that i was scum.
if something has a non-plausible explanation as town and a plausible explanation as scum, it makes sense to treat it as a scumtell. i don't know what else to say about that. i even like to think that i consider a lot of possibilities and keep my mind pretty open to plausible explanations for things from other people's perspectives.In post 1059, Moongrass wrote:So the play makes no sense. it doesn't mean I'm scum, my actions weren't sensical as any alignment. I was trying to test two things - if you'd catch it and what you did either way. I then picked you for scum because you didn't seem to get it or read me based on it, and then I left it to pursue other people because you weren't a D1 lim anyway.In post 1054, northsidegal wrote:i consider it a towntell (i.e. more likely to come from town than scum), but here's the key point: thereIn post 1053, Moongrass wrote:Like what do you think I was doing?areplausible narratives for doing what you did as scum, but idon'treally see a plausible narrative for doing what you did if there was any chance you thought that i was scum.
you're not.In post 1061, Moongrass wrote:Fake claiming mason. I mean really? I'm going to be really annoyed if I was right and you all made me change my mind.
It didn't have a plausible explanation as scum.In post 1062, northsidegal wrote:a plausible explanation as scum, it makes sense to treat it as a scumtell
It wasIn post 1063, Moongrass wrote:No I claimed to stop you trying to sell me as scum for having info on town roles. You literally challenged me to lim you, I made my case for you over Andre based on mechanics and now you're upset I tried as if I did it for no reason whatsoever. I still don't understand your townread on Andre or why you were determined I was scum the whole day.
plausible explanations: you, being scum and looking out for crumbs, notice the crumb. in an effort to remain natural and play to your towngame, you point it out as a reason for a townread, with the thought that this is what you'd do if you were town. after all, it doesn't really harm you that much to reveal it to a townie. alternatively, you want to be able to point back to it the next day and say "i noticed this and this was why i townread that player".In post 1064, Moongrass wrote:It didn't have a plausible explanation as scum.In post 1062, northsidegal wrote:a plausible explanation as scum, it makes sense to treat it as a scumtell
That's an exaggeration, you've said one post was weird and then asked me about my progression.In post 1065, northsidegal wrote:have been explaining my scumread on you the entire day.
fair, it's an exaggeration to say that i've been explaining it the entire day, but it has been explained in a decently detailed manner, i'd say, if you would read some of my more recent posts.In post 1066, Moongrass wrote:That's an exaggeration, you've said one post was weird and then asked me about my progression.In post 1065, northsidegal wrote:have been explaining my scumread on you the entire day.
i wouldn't say that i'm mad. it always bothers me to be scumread for no real reason. the RC comment was to say that i still genuinely can see a world in which you're scum, but on principle i'm not voting you and there's something of a bad feeling in that. it has nothing to do with "policy", i always play to wincon.Why do you seem mad enough that you wish you were RC to policy lim me? Like I'm not intentionally throwing the game for lols. I'm doing my best to work it out. It's actually fortunate you aren't RC for your sake, not mine.
Going to need more of an explanation here.In post 1071, sang froid wrote:Also not caught up but that seems to be what’s happened here
neighbors are not effectively masons.In post 1072, VFP wrote:Yeah there's no reason for us to vote outside of the neibours with a Mason claim. Otherwise town effectively have 2 sets of masons, which I don't buy.