In post 894, Shrek wrote:actually wait what am i saying t3 is just lurking out of pressure which is his classic scumtell
VOTE: T3
This is very valid. Add to it this:
In post 167, Roden wrote: In post 131, T3 wrote: In post 58, Roden wrote:That does nothing to convince me you're making actual reads lol
VOTE: Roden
From an objective standpoint what mastina is doing makes no sense. The way you're gunning for mastina feels like you want to get an ez mislim.
You've seen my scum games more than anyone else, you should know I don't push ez mis-elims D1, I save them for later lol.
In post 168, Roden wrote: In post 145, T3 wrote:The way Roden is playing rn and actively gunning for people for shit reasons means he's probably scum. I also get why mastina says Roden feels different to Yakra.
You're playing
very
differently this game.
In post 268, Roden wrote:I'm fairly certain my tone is very different since I'm way more reckless and aggressive as town, while more passive and pocket happy as scum. It's why I'm also heavily suspicious of T3 since he knows this yet thinks scum!me openly and pointlessly puts a target on my back early Day 1.
In post 472, Roden wrote: In post 469, Roden wrote: In post 420, T3 wrote:Roden's claim feels believable? But also he's such a minor character, I could see that as one of scum's fakeclaims.
This is such a confusing line of posts? You think I could be fake claiming because my role is a minor character, yet you're claiming Norm who has zero plot relevance? Mine actually has plot relevance in the first episode and could easily be Masons with the character who plays his wife, so it would be so unnecessarily risky to fake claim this guy.
I have no idea why you still want to elim me here if you believe my claim anyway.
To add to this, why haven't you tried to meta me yet? You usually love using meta and dumping meta analysis posts in the game.
In post 473, Roden wrote: In post 186, T3 wrote: In post 168, Roden wrote: In post 145, T3 wrote:The way Roden is playing rn and actively gunning for people for shit reasons means he's probably scum. I also get why mastina says Roden feels different to Yakra.
You're playing
very
differently this game.
I am.
These two posts feel a lot less congruent now that you're claiming VT.
In post 508, Roden wrote:T3 is playing super scummy, giving zero content, and refusing to use meta even though he always does that as town, also no outrageous gambits either. His partner probably threatened to bus him if he tried to pull any dumb stunts.
In post 540, Roden wrote: In post 536, T3 wrote: In post 528, CheekyTeeky wrote:I would advise to shoot me later in the game. If it doesn't end the day then it may be best to shoot lurking slots like Enchant or Zyla so we don't have to waste lims on people scum won't shoot. I get full credit if T3 flips scum BTW
VOTE: T3
you are scumreading me because 'i have no fire'
what a dumb case
Aren't you scum reading me because I didn't get mad and throw a fit on page 2?
In post 291, Guillotina wrote:T3 could be scum, you cant scum read someone arriving at the same conclusion that you did, about the same player, when that someone concluded it before you. It does not make sense, it's a fake push.
On top of this, you've got even more, too.
T3's play here has been incredibly lackluster even when present and not been very solvey.
But beyond that, there's also the fact that T3 explicitly claimed VT on D1, but is trying, repeatedly, to backtrack out of that VT claim and claim a PR. This is the sort of thing I would, explicitly, expect him to pull as scum.