I don’t know? I have a general vibe I answered but I don’t have much more than that.In post 647, Save The Dragons wrote:ok mathblade, who's number 3 in terms of scumminess
You’re still not giving reads so *shrug*
I don’t know? I have a general vibe I answered but I don’t have much more than that.In post 647, Save The Dragons wrote:ok mathblade, who's number 3 in terms of scumminess
People have you in their coalition simply due to RVS /first impressionsIn post 648, Save The Dragons wrote:i would also argue that this is untrue given that people have me in the coalitionIn post 644, MathBlade wrote:You haven’t provided any thing to read you on and still haven’t.
As I said earlier StD pinged me and in the context of the post I pinged makes sense with Cyrus.In post 649, Nathann wrote:Is there any reason Save The Dragons is Scum other than apparently not providing things to be read on?In post 644, MathBlade wrote:You haven’t provided any thing to read you on and still haven’t.
Partly because I am lazy. Mostly because your style of catching up and commenting on thibgs leaves a lot of noise for me to fig through to find that one post that mentions your read. And even if I find it, it doesn't actually explain anything, because all you're basing things on is vibes and pings. And I don't have anything against gutreads, don't get me wrong, but when you keep refusing to give out any substance of the reads, I'm going to start to think there actually isn't any.In post 652, MathBlade wrote:Why aren’t you looking back at that section instead of asking me the same question ten times in 10 different ways?
Here, I looked back and found the post. It is hot air and explains absolutely nothing. I also checked your ISO, no explanation anywhere. So.In post 585, MathBlade wrote:Need more from STD. Cyrus +STD top theory atmIn post 94, Save The Dragons wrote:Theres not enough information to get a read on me
It’s right there.In post 657, Nathann wrote:Here, I looked back and found the post. It is hot air and explains absolutely nothing. I also checked your ISO, no explanation anywhere. So.In post 585, MathBlade wrote:Need more from STD. Cyrus +STD top theory atmIn post 94, Save The Dragons wrote:Theres not enough information to get a read on me
In post 655, Save The Dragons wrote:can you really not figure out why nathann and i are asking you to clarify your scum read on me?
It’s you calling it noise.In post 656, Nathann wrote:Partly because I am lazy. Mostly because your style of catching up and commenting on thibgs leaves a lot of noise for me to fig through to find that one post that mentions your read. And even if I find it, it doesn't actually explain anything, because all you're basing things on is vibes and pings. And I don't have anything against gutreads, don't get me wrong, but when you keep refusing to give out any substance of the reads, I'm going to start to think there actually isn't any.In post 652, MathBlade wrote:Why aren’t you looking back at that section instead of asking me the same question ten times in 10 different ways?
Not really no.In post 659, Save The Dragons wrote:In post 655, Save The Dragons wrote:can you really not figure out why nathann and i are asking you to clarify your scum read on me?
At the time, Kyouko had posted literally nothing game related, so did you magically know you were going to mindmeld with her later on so that you don't Scumread her for the lack of content?In post 658, MathBlade wrote:Std hasn’t given anything to read him by where as I have and others have.
The explanation is in the quote.
not only that but apparently at post 94 i was being scumread but since then i've posted a lot more and it's not changed your view?In post 662, Save The Dragons wrote:and you think that post is enough to explain a scumread on me
Again when I got to Kyo’s post I melded with her mechanics.In post 663, Nathann wrote:At the time, Kyouko had posted literally nothing game related, so did you magically know you were going to mindmeld with her later on so that you don't Scumread her for the lack of content?In post 658, MathBlade wrote:Std hasn’t given anything to read him by where as I have and others have.
The explanation is in the quote.
And Save The Dragons has had reads. You keep kind of evading that.
give examplesIn post 665, MathBlade wrote:In contrast StD posted memorable filler to be liked
The only thing memorable is you pushed meIn post 664, Save The Dragons wrote:not only that but apparently at post 94 i was being scumread but since then i've posted a lot more and it's not changed your view?In post 662, Save The Dragons wrote:and you think that post is enough to explain a scumread on me
this sounds like you're making it up and trying to justify a bad read tbh
In post 71, Save The Dragons wrote:you don't trust me? :crying:
In post 94, Save The Dragons wrote:Theres not enough information to get a read on me
In post 118, Save The Dragons wrote:i believe this gif speaks for itselfIn post 104, Farren wrote:Wanting to see if Save The Dragons reacts to a blatant disagreement of his statement, and if so, how.
Spoiler:
In post 156, Save The Dragons wrote:*a choir of angels starts to sing through a hole in the clouds which is pretty neat considering i'm agnostic*
In post 168, Save The Dragons wrote:You're hot then you're cold
You're yes then you're no
You're in then you're out
You're up then you're down
ExamplesIn post 171, Save The Dragons wrote:You dont have to just assume I'm town
Correct only after I pushed you.In post 668, Save The Dragons wrote:i've barely pushed you until 5 minutes ago
Your other posts are naked one linersIn post 670, Save The Dragons wrote:okay what about my other posts
because your read of me sucks and when pressed on it you were like "why don't people understand?"In post 671, MathBlade wrote:Correct only after I pushed you.In post 668, Save The Dragons wrote:i've barely pushed you until 5 minutes ago
I know there’s omgus somewhere it’s a matter of where