In post 510, Mystik Spiral wrote:i’ve already answered your question twice now. if you are mafia, you know i’m not your buddy. therefore you know i have to be either town or jester.
That just means I'm guilty until proven innocent. I'm Mafia so I know you are not Mafia because I'm Mafia. It's a circular argument.
Not
EBWOP
your certainly on my being jester and not considering that i could be town. that’s definitely what you were doing last night, was it not?
it just feels like you KNOW i can’t be scum.
Yes, that was before I knew what your main was like via Wisdom. I had a valid read, but somehow everything I say confirms I am Mafia to you.
it’s hard not to think that after the way you treated me yesterday and i’m pretty damned certain that the converse would also hold if i had done that to you.
I didn't want to respond to everything you said to me because frankly, I find you annoying.
that’s something scum often says to me when i’m town.
In post 486, Wisdom wrote:No it points to her knowing both are non-scum
What?
It points to not knowing if either is jester, if anything, and even then only loosely. It doesn't slip notscum knowledge so much as not S/S knowledge, which is aptly explained either by Clem being town or Meg being town. Or both.
In post 510, Mystik Spiral wrote:i’ve already answered your question twice now. if you are mafia, you know i’m not your buddy. therefore you know i have to be either town or jester.
That just means I'm guilty until proven innocent. I'm Mafia so I know you are Mafia because I'm Mafia. It's a circular argument.
wut
IF
you’re mafia, you obviously know i’m not. if you’re goal is to cause me to have a headache, it’s working.
How do you know I am Mafia?
Everything you have said about me recently is that I am Mafia. Yes, clearly I was jumping to conclusions there. /s
so why quote a post, where I clearly said “if” then?
Are you even reading what I am saying to you? You are literally voting me because you think I am Mafia. Your read on me is that I am Mafia. Just because you frame the statement as "If" doesn't mean you have a very strong read that I am Mafia. You can say "If" but if you really mean you are so sure I am Mafia, then you use "If" for very little reason.
How about this, how sure are you I am Mafia on a scale of 1-10 where 10 is totally sure and 1 is seeing no possibility of it?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Well, you are annoying. And again, somehow everything I do confirms I am Mafia to you. You could not be any more biased than you already are, and that's why you are annoying.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 486, Wisdom wrote:No it points to her knowing both are non-scum
What?
It points to not knowing if either is jester, if anything, and even then only loosely. It doesn't slip notscum knowledge so much as not S/S knowledge, which is aptly explained either by Clem being town or Meg being town. Or both.
I have no clue what youre saying
Increased chances of someone being jester only occur if youre scum and know they arent scum
In post 468, Wisdom wrote:Like its another thing discussing the setup in mafia discussion and going "oh, 3-3 tie close to deadline is bad because jester will vote and get the lim"
and another to actually be a player in the game with reads and encourage LQ to hammer Cakez because of said theory
?
It's not a theory thing.
If Clem and Cakez are tied at 3 votes at deadline and EITHER of them is jester, town loses the game. It makes total sense to argue for a hammer on the player you think is less likely to be jester. It makes just as much sense to argue for a vote to break the deadlock if you're unsure which is jester. Risking the game on one player will always be better than risking the game on two players.
In post 510, Mystik Spiral wrote:i’ve already answered your question twice now. if you are mafia, you know i’m not your buddy. therefore you know i have to be either town or jester.
That just means I'm guilty until proven innocent. I'm Mafia so I know you are Mafia because I'm Mafia. It's a circular argument.
wut
IF
you’re mafia, you obviously know i’m not. if you’re goal is to cause me to have a headache, it’s working.
How do you know I am Mafia?
Everything you have said about me recently is that I am Mafia. Yes, clearly I was jumping to conclusions there. /s
so why quote a post, where I clearly said “if” then?
Are you even reading what I am saying to you? You are literally voting me because you think I am Mafia. Your read on me is that I am Mafia. Just because you frame the statement as "If" doesn't mean you have a very strong read that I am Mafia. You can say "If" but if you really mean you are so sure I am Mafia, then you use "If" for very little reason.
How about this, how sure are you I am Mafia on a scale of 1-10 where 10 is totally sure and 1 is seeing no possibility of it?
the fact that you keep deflecting here and ignoring what i just said about the extremely scummy way you interacted with me yesterday speaks volumes and your only response is a lame-ass you find me “annoying”? do you think i care if the obectively scummiest slot to interact with me finds me annoying? no i honestly don’t gaf.
i think based off of both your play and Bingle’s case on you, you have the highest scum equity to me in this game. and unlike imaginality who had some takes i could possibly see as townie, i’m still waiting to see that from you. if i’m wrong here, then it’s on you for not doing anything to make me think i’m wrong on you.
In post 510, Mystik Spiral wrote:i’ve already answered your question twice now. if you are mafia, you know i’m not your buddy. therefore you know i have to be either town or jester.
That just means I'm guilty until proven innocent. I'm Mafia so I know you are Mafia because I'm Mafia. It's a circular argument.
wut
IF
you’re mafia, you obviously know i’m not. if you’re goal is to cause me to have a headache, it’s working.
How do you know I am Mafia?
Everything you have said about me recently is that I am Mafia. Yes, clearly I was jumping to conclusions there. /s
so why quote a post, where I clearly said “if” then?
Are you even reading what I am saying to you? You are literally voting me because you think I am Mafia. Your read on me is that I am Mafia. Just because you frame the statement as "If" doesn't mean you have a very strong read that I am Mafia. You can say "If" but if you really mean you are so sure I am Mafia, then you use "If" for very little reason.
How about this, how sure are you I am Mafia on a scale of 1-10 where 10 is totally sure and 1 is seeing no possibility of it?
the fact that you keep deflecting here and ignoring what i just said about the extremely scummy way you interacted with me yesterday speaks volumes and your only response is a lame-ass you find me “annoying”? do you think i care if the obectively scummiest slot to interact with me finds me annoying? no i honestly don’t gaf.
i think based off of both your play and Bingle’s case on you, you have the highest scum equity to me in this game. and unlike imaginality who had some takes i could possibly see as townie, i’m still waiting to see that from you. if i’m wrong here, then it’s on you for not doing anything to make me think i’m wrong on you.
Fine. Then when I flip Town you can eat sour grapes.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Well, you are annoying. And again, somehow everything I do confirms I am Mafia to you. You could not be any more biased than you already are, and that's why you are annoying.
whstever you are here, your arrogance and hypocrisy is astounding.
In post 468, Wisdom wrote:Like its another thing discussing the setup in mafia discussion and going "oh, 3-3 tie close to deadline is bad because jester will vote and get the lim"
and another to actually be a player in the game with reads and encourage LQ to hammer Cakez because of said theory
?
It's not a theory thing.
If Clem and Cakez are tied at 3 votes at deadline and EITHER of them is jester, town loses the game. It makes total sense to argue for a hammer on the player you think is less likely to be jester. It makes just as much sense to argue for a vote to break the deadlock if you're unsure which is jester. Risking the game on one player will always be better than risking the game on two players.
the obvious problem with that theory, is the exact same thing is also true for scum, so all this telling me is that she can’t be jester not why she’s town?
I said I would follow my policy [of quickhammering anyone at E1] especially if Meg and I were S/S. But keep pretending to read my posts, it makes the scumclaims so much harder to see. /s
