In post 365, OkaPoka wrote:i thought luke and mom's interactions were "obv mason" (oops) and then i thought mom and jessica's lack of interactions but still cross townreading each other was mason indicative
i tried really hard to not masontell by just minimizing my interactions and coming to best conclusions i could and either nakedvote or just case at people and not actally generate associateives
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 365, OkaPoka wrote:i thought luke and mom's interactions were "obv mason" (oops) and then i thought mom and jessica's lack of interactions but still cross townreading each other was mason indicative
i tried really hard to not masontell by just minimizing my interactions and coming to best conclusions i could and either nakedvote or just case at people and not actally generate associateives
You were the mason I was least confident in, and the slot that I was worried we might have wrong. So, you did a good job hiding it
In post 365, OkaPoka wrote:i thought luke and mom's interactions were "obv mason" (oops) and then i thought mom and jessica's lack of interactions but still cross townreading each other was mason indicative
Idk why you thought that when Luke was so low in my reads list and I was soft pushing him in thread
Needing to strike a balance between hiding the mason associatives and actually being an active force in this game was hard.
I needed to find reasons in game to town read my mason buddies so it wouldn't be obvious and I didnt want to push on a buddy hard in a way that they could be in danger of garnering suspicion.
Watching Oka say "i know who the masons are" then subsequently pushing them both was like...
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
In post 375, Lukewarm wrote:If I was town, I would have voted you in a minute.
And my only real regret this game, is not trying to push you sooner tbh
You very obviously have terrible reads in that case. Trying to find out why someone trs another slot is very clearly NOT mason hunting.
In most set ups that is true.
But in this set up, when someone gives a town read that they don't explain, pointing it out and asking them about it can only lead to an answer that would help the scum team deduce if they were mason partners or not
You were the person that I very much thought was not a mason, but my partners kept saying they thought you were. So it seemed fitting to go out purposefully misfiring on you lol
You were the person that I very much thought was not a mason, but my partners kept saying they thought you were. So it seemed fitting to go out purposefully misfiring on you lol
What’s the difference between conceding and getting yourself killed?
I think that the speed of the game probably works against scum activating their dayvigges. I think it maybe not being nightless would probably have made it more balanced and I probably really didn’t fully grasp the setup or I wouldn’t have hesitated on putting T3 at e-1, so I understand why that looked bad because normally it wouldn’t.
Scum!T3 submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the hammer already happened
Scum!Shelby submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the hammer already happened
Scum!Luke submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the concede had already happened
Scum!T3 submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the hammer already happened
Scum!Shelby submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the hammer already happened
Scum!Luke submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the concede had already happened
Yeah, that was kind of my point. Scum doesn’t want to risk being wrong unless dying, which creates that scenario.
Well, except of course wrt to the concede obviously. So, I think if scum could have night vigs instead, they would have had a much better chance of winning this.
Scum!T3 submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the hammer already happened
Scum!Shelby submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the hammer already happened
Scum!Luke submitted a vig shot, but it failed because the concede had already happened
Yeah, that was kind of my point. Scum doesn’t want to risk being wrong unless dying, which creates that scenario.
Well, except of course wrt to the concede obviously. So, I think if scum could have night vigs instead, they would have had a much better chance of winning this.
I actually think that the only reason we lost was due to the timing. T3 was getting ran up when he was not online. Shelby was drawing suspicions while he was at work.
We had the right answer, so we could have won. But the timing was just bad