Open 840 - Guardians of the Fortress [Game Over]

implosion · Post Post #1850 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 9:52 am

In post 1848, Tanner wrote:if implo hammers that i am going to scream

but hrrm you tempt me

VP Baltar · Post Post #1851 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 9:55 am

Fascinating development from all the hemming and hawing.

Tanner · Post Post #1852 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:00 am

implo, you don't slowroll this yeah?

Tanner · Post Post #1853 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:01 am

In post 1851, VP Baltar wrote:Fascinating development from all the hemming and hawing.

when gate was supposed to be the first shit to flip but the ic is a coward so everything else is getting resolved first

imaginality · Post Post #1854 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:01 am

In post 1852, Tanner wrote:implo, you don't slowroll this yeah?

He does it he wants you to mislim me before he flips scum proving my theory about VP and him to be true

imaginality · Post Post #1855 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:02 am

VP Baltar · Post Post #1856 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:05 am

Hammer imaginality, be a hero

imaginality · Post Post #1857 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:06 am

In post 1819, VP Baltar wrote:
In post 1808, imaginality wrote:If I were scum Luke wouldn't throw Keep because he sees it's likely I lose Gate. Luke wins Keep, I probably go down against you at Gate, and then it's down to my buddy at Wall. And who's my buddy? I don't have one, I'm town. I already told Tanner who I think yours is, I don't need to tell you who it is because you can just look at your role PM to see.
I thought you said Luke couldn't win the keep?

VP is flat out lying about what I said, not for the first time.

url=viewtopic.php?p=13192279#p13192279]post 1650[/url]

Hammer VP, be a hero!

imaginality · Post Post #1858 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:08 am

post 1650

RH9 please unvote because if Tanner mislims me implosion is gonna insta-hammer numberQ and win for scum. I don't want to risk the game on the smaller chance numberQ is the scum.

imaginality · Post Post #1859 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:09 am

Tanner you can hammer VP now without risk, but please don't hammer me until RH9 unvotes (or Wall gets resolved)

VP Baltar · Post Post #1860 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:12 am

My man out here sweating hard.

Tanner · Post Post #1861 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:12 am

i mean... that assumes that i actually agree with your theory

ISO · Post Post #1862 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:14 am

In post 1858, imaginality wrote:post 1650

RH9 please unvote because if Tanner mislims me implosion is gonna insta-hammer numberQ and win for scum. I don't want to risk the game on the smaller chance numberQ is the scum.

What if Baltar is right about you being scum with numberQ or you know that if Wall flips before Gate, Tanner will look for associatives? I think that you're just scared because if anybody but implosion flips scum in the Wall, you will be incriminated. What makes you think that implosion doesn't have the possibility to be Town and that he's going to win for Town. I think that my vote on numberQ definitely got reactions from everybody but numberQ. Once I get his reaction, which I can use to sort him, then maybe just maybe I will unvote. However, for now, I'm going to wait.

imaginality · Post Post #1863 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:14 am

In post 1861, Tanner wrote:i mean... that assumes that i actually agree with your theory

No, even if I were scum you could still hammer VP and win at the Wall. Because no way is implosion scum if I'm scum, so he won't autohammer.

Whereas when I flip town, implosion is in ideal position right now to win at Wall.

Tanner · Post Post #1864 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:16 am

In post 1862, RH9 wrote:I think that my vote on numberQ definitely got reactions from everybody but numberQ. Once I get his reaction, which I can use to sort him, then maybe just maybe I will unvote.

rh9 really out here using a 3p-lylo vote as a "reaction test" my god

implosion · Post Post #1865 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:20 am

there is a significant part of me that wants to just hammer lol

and tbh i would probably slowroll here as scum

Tanner · Post Post #1866 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:20 am

In post 1863, imaginality wrote:
In post 1861, Tanner wrote:i mean... that assumes that i actually agree with your theory
No, even if I were scum you could still hammer VP and win at the Wall. Because no way is implosion scum if I'm scum, so he won't autohammer.

Whereas when I flip town, implosion is in ideal position right now to win at Wall.

i think i missed the memo on why implosion and you cannot be scum together. because even if i were to agree with your theory of "luke lowered his chance of winning keep because he's certain in the other two games, and implo is in best standing at the wall", that doesn't mean you can't be partners?

Tanner · Post Post #1867 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:22 am

In post 1865, implosion wrote:and tbh i would probably slowroll here as scum

yeah, i realized there is some value in this game to slowrolling, as opposed to the usual "just being an asshole"

which kinda sucks, i just came up with a theory on why it could be rh9, but i keep thinking his posts are just too wild to be scum lmao

ISO · Post Post #1868 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:25 am

implosion, follow your heart.

imaginality · Post Post #1869 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:26 am

In post 1866, Tanner wrote:
In post 1863, imaginality wrote:
In post 1861, Tanner wrote:i mean... that assumes that i actually agree with your theory
No, even if I were scum you could still hammer VP and win at the Wall. Because no way is implosion scum if I'm scum, so he won't autohammer.

Whereas when I flip town, implosion is in ideal position right now to win at Wall.
i think i missed the memo on why implosion and you cannot be scum together. because even if i were to agree with your theory of "luke lowered his chance of winning keep because he's certain in the other two games, and implo is in best standing at the wall", that doesn't mean you can't be partners?

If you agree with that theory: Would Luke feel certain I was going to win Gate? Nope. So it's VP plus someone they're confident will win Wall, which is very likely implosion.

ISO · Post Post #1870 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:28 am

And Tanner, may we read your theory? Maybe it is worthwhile for everybody to read. And am I really that wild?

Tanner · Post Post #1871 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 10:30 am

i already explained it. you enter the game, start calling luke scum for absolutely nonsense reasons, luke 180's his read on you and starts calling you scum, and then accelerates the keep flip. it doesn't feel natural at all.

you just claimed that you're using a 3p-lylo vote as a reason test. i don't think anything more needs to be said.

VP Baltar · Post Post #1872 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 1:56 pm

In post 1869, imaginality wrote:If you agree with that theory: Would Luke feel certain I was going to win Gate? Nope. So it's VP plus someone they're confident will win Wall, which is very likely implosion.

You still have not explained why hypo-scum me wouldn't just have Luke win at Keep and me at Gate. This is the fundamental nonsense to what you're saying.

Tanner · Post Post #1873 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 2:39 pm

baltar, could you point me in the direction of the immense grillings that luke was giving you over whatever shit it was? i don't feel like reading through either of your 200+ post isos to find it and i wanted to at least look at that today

VP Baltar · Post Post #1874 (ISO) » Sat Jan 01, 2022 2:48 pm

In post 1873, Tanner wrote:baltar, could you point me in the direction of the immense grillings that luke was giving you over whatever shit it was? i don't feel like reading through either of your 200+ post isos to find it and i wanted to at least look at that today

Not immense grilling, just like repeated questioning and clearly indicating he found me "scummy". I think I cited some of this when I reread him. Standby.