I'd like to hear from the rest of you about the whole purposely entering MeLo thing.
I know a couple of you have said no, but why? Is it just a reflex against voting Town, or have you actually thought it through and found fault with the proposed plan?
Maybe the real Mafia was the friends we made along the way
In post 450, Radical Rat wrote:I'd like to hear from the rest of you about the whole purposely entering MeLo thing.
I know a couple of you have said no, but why? Is it just a reflex against voting Town, or have you actually thought it through and found fault with the proposed plan?
I skimmed past it, to. be honest. And honestly, it is mainly a reflex for me not to vote Galron.
In post 450, Radical Rat wrote:I'd like to hear from the rest of you about the whole purposely entering MeLo thing.
I know a couple of you have said no, but why? Is it just a reflex against voting Town, or have you actually thought it through and found fault with the proposed plan?
I skimmed past it, to. be honest. And honestly, it is mainly a reflex for me not to vote Galron.
In post 450, Radical Rat wrote:I'd like to hear from the rest of you about the whole purposely entering MeLo thing.
I know a couple of you have said no, but why? Is it just a reflex against voting Town, or have you actually thought it through and found fault with the proposed plan?
It's grown on me since but there's better ways to do it than eliminating galron. Opening the chance to hang scum instead is always better and keeps a confirmed Town alive
oh wow i missed that. no, that isn't a good idea. confirmed townies are wildly +ev for town in nightless games. if you're worried about jesters scumsiding, you can execute a mafia and then let the jesters scumside & magically get town executions through, and then we're in a better position overall and we can check out who made a 180 after the mafia execution. this is assuming for the sake of argument that jesters will behave in this cookie cutter way which is also barely believable. that seems like a caricature of an idea someone would put forward to seem like a jester
In post 362, Radical Rat wrote:So we have Jesters forced into Townsiding while we hopefully find the scumteam, and though by the same token the Jesters must Scumside after the first Mafia is hit, the change in behavior should be noticeable enough to avoid eliminating them.
ok, so this is an idea i also had except in reverse.
In post 454, schadd_ wrote:oh wow i missed that. no, that isn't a good idea. confirmed townies are wildly +ev for town in nightless games. if you're worried about jesters scumsiding, you can execute a mafia and then let the jesters scumside & magically get town executions through, and then we're in a better position overall and we can check out who made a 180 after the mafia execution. this is assuming for the sake of argument that jesters will behave in this cookie cutter way which is also barely believable. that seems like a caricature of an idea someone would put forward to seem like a jester
In post 362, Radical Rat wrote:So we have Jesters forced into Townsiding while we hopefully find the scumteam, and though by the same token the Jesters must Scumside after the first Mafia is hit, the change in behavior should be noticeable enough to avoid eliminating them.
ok, so this is an idea i also had except in reverse.
my immediate inclination would be to think that it comea from mafia, especially since if the idea gains trqction the primary purpose it qould serve would be to contribute to the mafia win condition. but i hesitate to try to make anything of it like that
In post 362, Radical Rat wrote:So we have Jesters forced into Townsiding while we hopefully find the scumteam, and though by the same token the Jesters must Scumside after the first Mafia is hit, the change in behavior should be noticeable enough to avoid eliminating them.
ok, so this is an idea i also had except in reverse.
I like your idea more than RR's, honestly.
you mean like the idea of just tryinf to execute mafia? hell yeah brother
entering melo is a fucking stupid idea why would we get into a situation where it's easier to lose instead of a situation where it's easier to win
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
like if jesters change playstyle when town is one good yeet away from winning then they have self outed and that gives us a better poe pool
whoever suggested that im gonna vote
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
I feel confused. There doesn't seem to be much cohesion between the heads. I would expect that one head tell the other what is going on but it seems both heads have their own schedules.
In post 454, schadd_ wrote:oh wow i missed that. no, that isn't a good idea. confirmed townies are wildly +ev for town in nightless games. if you're worried about jesters scumsiding, you can execute a mafia and then let the jesters scumside & magically get town executions through, and then we're in a better position overall and we can check out who made a 180 after the mafia execution. this is assuming for the sake of argument that jesters will behave in this cookie cutter way which is also barely believable. that seems like a caricature of an idea someone would put forward to seem like a jester
This is for their really conspicuous ideas, right?
The ones you called 'stupid', which I disagree on. RR might not share your logic but this doesn't mean that their ideas are 'stupid' They could just be misguided.
In post 443, AtE wrote:Okay, we’ll get our signatures straight.
~At
I’ll make them sign with tE okay?
I did tell them to do that on discord but then they started doing the “head” thing, so I went along with it but I’ll talk to them. You’re not fun anymore. :/
So which head wrote which posts?
Or should I pretend that tE wrote most of them?
Actually At was the more active, better, smarter and funnier head but tE might challenge that assertion.