Micro 1040: Shirley, You Blitz!

[Galron]

VOTE: meg
radical rat

[Radical Rat]

I want RH9 as my new hydra partner. What do you say Jingle? They aren’t cooperating with me. :/

Works for me. Radical Rat, wanna be my new hydra partner?

-tE

Sure thing, what alignment are we now?

[Radical Rat]

Mental load? As town you could post freely, as jester all the more, as scum it's important not to get sent to college - resulting in more boring-looking posting styles.

-tE

This is a very interesting point, however I don't think it necessarily applies here. For one, I don't actually think Meg's ISO is boring. Push on bugspray, easy though it may have been, is something I agreed with, obviously, and the fact that she actually gave thought to my intentional MeLo idea and offered legitimate criticism beyond "No that's stupid," is interesting to me, though perhaps my personal involvement biases me somewhat.

However, there's also the fact that the existence of Jesters is public. If I were scum, my goal would be to look like a Jester, which would involve Not being boring. Though of course, each individual would likely have a different approach, and I'm not good enough at meta reads, or confident enough in my knowledge of any of these players regardless. Except maybe N_M, but he's dead already so.

[Radical Rat]

VOTE: meg
radical rat

Is there any particular reason you scumread us?

[schadd_]

I wonder if N_M still thinks Meg and RH9.

me tooooooo

[Radical Rat]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

[Jingle]

Vote Count 4.1

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to send someone to Clown College.

MegAzumaril (2 votes til Clown Town): schadd_ , Galron
Radical Rat (2 votes til Clown Town): schadd_ , Galron
AtE (3 votes til Clown Town): schadd_
WINfried (4 votes til Clown Town):
schadd_ (4 votes til Clown Town):
RH9 (4 votes til Clown Town):
Galron (4 votes til Clown Town):

Deadline for Day 4 is in (expired on 2022-01-12 14:39:20).

[Galron]

Actually

VOTE: schadd

That hammer came after not saying anything about bugsy

Also not liking schadds last post

[schadd_]

i hadn't felt inspired by the bugspray vote (seemed like a jester, would be hard to get associatives), but they also just didnt seem like someone that had a high probability of being town. i didn't say anything abt bugsy, but i also had already stated two townreads on people who weren't bugsy which i think makes it fairly clear that they would have been in my poe. i forgot that there was the deadline threshhold thing at deadline & i thought that it was just chosen randomly among people who had the most votes; in the couple hours left in the day, there wasn't really enough time for another good faith wagon (maybe somebody decides on a whim to vote megaz? but i also didn't really mind keeping them in the game) but there would be a theoretical possibility of mafia/jesters piling onto someone randomly. so i just voted bugspray. i don't think that this really changed any outcomes.

with regards to 554: i mean i have been thinking that. i think nm's reads are decent and i'd think he was telling the truth. idk what to tell you.

theoretically i might get pissed at you for not like trying to talk to me about those things before voting me except i think i've barely been doing that with anyone else. but also keep in mind i will be trying to get you to townread me bc thats something that would nearly win us the game (with respect to mafia) if that happens

[Galron]

That's fair. The thought just kinda occurred to me and I knee jerked voted. I should have said something first. You're probably right about that.

[Galron]

But really I'm not feeling all that optimistic. We seen to be in mad max mode and I don't really like it.

[Galron]

And no one voting.

I'm going to ask for another vote on Meg.

[schadd_]

VOTE: megazumarill

[Galron]

Lol

[RH9]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

[RH9]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

I missed his Jester claim.

[Radical Rat]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

I missed his Jester claim.

Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???

[RH9]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

I missed his Jester claim.

Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???

Because he wanted to annoy me?

[RH9]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

I missed his Jester claim.

Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???

Because he wanted to annoy me?

I mean at least N_M is happy now.

[MegAzumarill]

Still thinking we should vote winfried here

[MegAzumarill]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

I missed his Jester claim.

Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???

Because he wanted to annoy me?

Who would want to annoy you so you vote for them?
This should've been an instant red flag

[MegAzumarill]

Why do you think it's me galron?

[RH9]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

I missed his Jester claim.

Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???

Because he wanted to annoy me?

Who would want to annoy you so you vote for them?
This should've been an instant red flag

I thought that this was N_M's playstyle.

[RH9]

What do YOU think we should do?
Why must it be others who decide your actions?

Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will answer this.
I think that we should discuss more before voting because we can't unvote.
I don't mean to act too passively but it has been my general stance in this game after the N_M incident that I ask other people before I perform drastic actions so that everybody has forthcoming knowledge of my intended actions.

And what drastic actions would you be considering?

Also, regarding the N_M incident...
Although I disagreed, the prevailing attitude seemed to be that eliminating a claimed Jester was the wrong play. A sentiment you seemed to agree with, since me having bad logic "eased your anxiety on me being Mafia."

So, I believe you thought it was actually E-1. But E-1 is essentially a hammer for a Jester. Though in this case Not_Mafia had already voted himself and couldn't have self-hammered, clearly you didn't check the VC before voting, so was N_M being moderately annoying really enough to make you okay with a "wrong" elimination?

I am considering voting a nullread. I skimmed past the VC by accident. And yes, N_M was quite annoying.

I missed his Jester claim.

Why did you think he was begging you to vote him???

Because he wanted to annoy me?

Who would want to annoy you so you vote for them?
This should've been an instant red flag

I thought that this was N_M's playstyle.

Sorry.

[MegAzumarill]

Rh9 who is scum?