In post 1742, Val89 wrote:I'm not sure I understand Cephrir. SirCakez said the locking of the thread was a bit of trolling, presumably to lend a bit of credibility to the idea LLD had legitimately dayvigged the bears. The other post wasn't mentioned, and would not do that. I assume therefore, that was legitimate and intended.
Why was this your focus on conversation? Anyway, if you want my take on it (which you probably don't but are getting anyway), I would presume that SirCakez made the first post when he unlocked the thread after locking it so people knew that he had seen the fake day vig shot. The latter post was meant to reinforce that it wasn't a real day vig, and he was simply trolling.
In post 1831, The Three Bears wrote:ok im finally here but i dont feel like reading up so i'll just try to keep up from here (PROBABLY WONT HAPPEN) but i'll try.
ALSO HECK YES for dunnstral repping in on main. i'll have a read on that slot soon i think
I have to ask, how does this change things for your ability to read the slot? My impression has been that Dunnstral made the majority of posts prior, so I don't see how Dunnstral replacing on his main changes things.
In post 1834, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:also, 1) irchers play is crap, 2) the reads are crap, 3) the scumhunting isnt fuckin there, the 4) wagon fucking keeps stalling despite no apparent resistance right at 5-6 votes, etc...
1) You should elaborate. We've (and by we, I mean the rest of the thread) already established that my quote walls style is NAI.
2) Okay, sure. I haven't presented much in terms of reads. Who would you like me to elaborate on?
3) Provide evidence.
4) This isn't a reason to scum read a player. Voting is way too volatile for this to be reliable.
And how does that mean anything? I already laid out how one of your arguments for scum me was completely flawed. You've been stuck on this one read since pregame, and everything you've done has been in relation to it. You aren't scumhunting. You are cruising on an early read that you have failed (and continue to fail) to elaborate on substantively. The only reason I'm not voting you right now is that there is zero interest (which astounds me).
I've noticed this, and I think it's scum indicative for you. You seem much less engaged than when you are town.
In post 1868, Roden wrote:Ircher- I haven't liked any of his posts. For the most part my eyes just glaze over when trying to read them, long wall posts segmented by quotes from multiple people just comes off as muddling to me.
This is not a legitimate reason to scum read me.
In post 1868, Roden wrote:The shade towards me for defending myself reads as a soft defense for himself for not engaging with people who are scum casing him.
I wasn't scum reading you for defending yourself; I was scum reading you for defending yourself at the exclusion of pretty much everything else. That point still hasn't changed.
In post 1868, Roden wrote:However I will add that his recent attempt to discredit the town reads on LLD weirdly coincides with Ircher's attempt to do the same.
Citation needed. I've been mildly town reading Lambdadelta for the majority of the game. Granted, I haven't expressed that too explicitly, but I don't recall expressing the opposite either (except perhaps very early game when MUSH and Lambdadelta were pushing Cephrir).
Read to bottom of
page 75.
