In post 344, Fenchurch wrote:Wenna is super wishy-washy and reluctant to commit to saying that anyone is more likely scum than anyone else
I was in the process of responding to this when Menno was executed.
I got a few reads earlier in this game, and have stuck to them. Postie/Fenchurch and CES. The cpol/Menno mess has been confusing but I was playing devil's advocate to both. (RE possible baddy vendor, and Menno being "zooted"). Just because I have openly declared that I cannot give concrete evidence does not make me wishy-washy. I have not been flip-flopping or vague, I have been clear, but also honest about the reliability of my feelings - as forum mafia is completely out of my comfort zone. Of course I can't make the same tells as usual, they are 99% body language and tone, 1% words and mechanics. However, I have said on several occasions that certain players do seem more scummy, in no uncertain terms:
"Whatever Menno is, I think even they would admit they've played it poorly on day one. So they could be either baddy or goody. Even though I have more feelings about CES, and also Postie, for whatever stupid reasons, being baddies, I feel like it would solve some mysteries to execute cpol or Menno. But at the same time, isn't that playing into what the baddies want?
So I'm conflicted. I feel like because of the hammer and potato stuff, the baddies may have just been able to sit and chill...? (Poro, Klick, Primate...)? [Note: I meant Nexus here, not Klick, who had been trying to get a potato vendor to speak up].
Saying that - if it's on 5/6 at ~11am tomorrow I will change my vote for an execution. On CES, cpol or Menno. I won't let my indecision stop the town from making a play."
This not wishy-washy, I am just not happy stating things like fact when they are subjective observations, hypotheses, or weak suppositions. I will reword it into statements: I have reads on CES/Postie. There have been strange mechanics RE cpol/Menno but it does not mean they are bad - this could have been created by the baddies to make town kill each other/waste time on it. There have been players that could have been using this confusion/paranoia to their advantage: Poro, Primate, Nexus.
After Menno's execution, Fenchurch said that:
In post 358, Fenchurch wrote:Wenna and Nexus have both done very little that makes them seem like town.
I don't know about Nexus, but I was willing to vote for a player that I did not want to execute (Menno, for reasons quoted above) just to ensure town got a kill.
It is things like this that are making me feel like Fenchurch is bad.
Also still have feelings on Postie, CES and obviously the aforementioned "lurkers" but for entirely different reasons.
I have only really had any bad feelings about anyone all game: Postie, Fenchurch and CES.