In post 71, furtiveglance wrote:I can see why certain pairs which trust each other might not want to challenge as well which makes it difficult.
Can you explain your thought process here to me?
I can see why certain pairs, trusting each other, would rather put pressure on 2 other pairs to challenge, than add themselves to a small votepool by challenging.
It would be really cool if everyone could state a read on their hood partner with reasons.
She asked me to ask the question in my last post for her because she felt that Furtive was associating her with Cephrir and I find that suspicious. Sorry Em. <3
why you booing me I'm right
like, I was correct in my intuition that furtive was sussing me in connection to cephrir. How is it suspect that I correctly figured out how someone was reading me and opted to have someone else inquire into that topic?
When Cephrir said that the Yume/Nancy exchange about the emoji was towny, that could have influenced my similar thinking
this is a total nothingburger response. I'll home in on my critique here: why and how does your scumread impacting your reads matter?
At the time that I wrote that, Cephrir was more of a null read, and quite frankly still is (or is at the moment). The suggestion that their read could have influenced mine was not based on the sometimes-used strategy of trusting a townread's reads, it was based on people's general tendency to be influenced by other people's ideas.
In post 288, MegAzumarill wrote:People really wantiing to dig into my page 5 posts while missing the context it's page 5. (furtive)
But words are cheap of course I'll have a proper catchup tomorrow for the recent explosion of posts.
In post 71, furtiveglance wrote:I can see why certain pairs which trust each other might not want to challenge as well which makes it difficult.
Can you explain your thought process here to me?
I can see why certain pairs, trusting each other, would rather put pressure on 2 other pairs to challenge, than add themselves to a small votepool by challenging.
Thing for me is unless you can godread your buddy you should be solving them actively.
I cant godread Nancy, not yet :p but I feel im damned good at reading her still. A votepool of 4 is dangerous territory to be in, as you know, and best way to avoid that is to be able to read your buddy for better and for worse. To me this reads as you want to avoid being in that situation at all.
Would love to know your thinking on the challenge you suggested.
Whatever the chains placed upon me
Whatever the prison, my soul has the key
No money can buy, no power can still
No burden can break the unshakeable strength of my will
In post 276, Gamma Emerald wrote:well I’ll wait for him to explicitly ask me before engaging that.
I am baffled by furtive's choice to not acknowledge this exchange
Like, gamma is supposedly one of your top suspects because of this unexplained action; I have set up an alley oop for you to get answers, and you're standing there checking out the bleachers
In post 276, Gamma Emerald wrote:well I’ll wait for him to explicitly ask me before engaging that.
I am baffled by furtive's choice to not acknowledge this exchange
Like, gamma is supposedly one of your top suspects because of this unexplained action; I have set up an alley oop for you to get answers, and you're standing there checking out the bleachers
Ok sure I will now formally ask Gamma Emerald why I was sus and not you all those pages ago, because apparently the onus is on me now
In post 276, Gamma Emerald wrote:well I’ll wait for him to explicitly ask me before engaging that.
I am baffled by furtive's choice to not acknowledge this exchange
Like, gamma is supposedly one of your top suspects because of this unexplained action; I have set up an alley oop for you to get answers, and you're standing there checking out the bleachers
Ok sure I will now formally ask Gamma Emerald why I was sus and not you all those pages ago, because apparently the onus is on me now
I mean yes I don't know why she chose to not just answer the question but,
In post 312, furtiveglance wrote:Bit more background to that is my experience on mafia.gg where sometimes mafia decide to just meme instead of saying anything game related
Why are some memes more scummy than others?
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
Flea, is this a fair summary of your thoughts of furtive?
You note that furtive had talked a bit about everyone except me. This intrigued you because you think it is important to sort one's teammate. You also note that furtive expresses himself in short sentences, almost as if he didn't want to elaborate, both in general and specifically when question about his read on me.
One idea you are considering is that furtive and I are scum together.
You note that I assumed you thought furtive not trying to sort me was scum-indicative, though you never said so. I am defending furtive both actively and indirectly. There's also something about my posting style (that I don't completely understand). Think makes me a bit suspicious in your eyes.
----
Additionally, do you or do you not think that furtive not attempting to sort me (at the time this discussion started etc etc) is AI?
In post 317, Save The Dragons wrote:i feel like furative's posts lack emotion and i don't know if that's just playstyle
Not sure who you mean by furative
FurAtive’s the zombie cousin to Etchan, furtive otoh is fine.
Current top reads are Yume, furtive, Mastina, Flea, Ythan. No confident srs yet but have some suspicion that fur
A
tive secretly harbours a scarlet letter A and that his real name is Hester Prynne.
***
We just need to tread carefully because if you slip up around her as scum she notices and will tear your spine out and slap you to death with it. (I'm slightly scared of Nancy)
~the worst
*******
Nancy is pretty heavenly ngl
~CheekyTeeky
*******
Nancy-scum feels like a hot knife slicing through butter. Nancy-town feels like a magnifying glass in the sun glaring down at an insect.
Yes, not yet but was and is an option for consideration at some point soon.
You made several assumptions which is NAI for someone who hasnt played with me oreviously. I am happy to give a better breakdown of your posting and how im reading it when im not on mobile.
In post 222, Flea The Magician wrote:And with your team. It's possible for both members of the team to be scumbuddies and generally an early tactic is often to not bring any light onto your buddies. The absence of you from his ISO screams louder than anything else there, and it caught my attention.
i was going to say something like "surely there are other pairs who aren't focused on each other" but then i realized there actually aren't
aisa's defense comes off townie but it's curious that it was posted from a motivation standpoint. why not let furtive fight his own battles
Would love to hear what you think the motivation might be
I'll be back later with chunkier thoughts
Still curious. I contemplated letting this go but then realised I'd look like a fool if I asked a bunch of questions without others answering them and since my primary motivator in life is avoiding embarrassment at all costs, well