Drew's right that it feels artificial. Like they're posting out of obligation and not genuine takes
I think it's kind of funny to vote someone for posting out of obligation genuine takes... When this is just your second post, and it's agreeing with someone else?
Do you have any thoughts on the massclaiming talk?
In post 134, Aeronaut wrote:
Also drew, I gotta say, it kinda seems like nono's amount of content isn't the issue. Also... Saying "explain" does not strike me as a well thought out method of seeming productive
Please explain?
(Sorry, working on my ironic jokes lol)
It isn't the one word posts, or I would be tunneling Gamma into oblivion lol.
The explain post and vote on you seemed like fake fluff, as I did just voice my opinion on.
I don’t post walls but I also very much don’t post one word at a time
In post 134, Aeronaut wrote:
Also drew, I gotta say, it kinda seems like nono's amount of content isn't the issue. Also... Saying "explain" does not strike me as a well thought out method of seeming productive
Please explain?
(Sorry, working on my ironic jokes lol)
It isn't the one word posts, or I would be tunneling Gamma into oblivion lol.
The explain post and vote on you seemed like fake fluff, as I did just voice my opinion on.
I don’t post walls but I also very much don’t post one word at a time
Also, wut
Which vote you calling as on LHF there? Can you quote it?
PEdit: nvm
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Hey looker could you give us some context here? Posting a person's ISO and then voting for them is nice and all, but I'd like to hear where you head is at
My head is in my ass. Also, Gamma clearly lied and it was pointed out by the person leading the largest wagon on a different person. Seems suspicious to me. Thank you for your skepticism.
In post 121, MegAzumarill wrote:
I mean if it's a fakeclaim it's basically saying he was betting his life on there being 0 roles that either give or produce feedback at night so I'm liable to believe he is in fact a 1 shot global roleblocker.
being honest, don’t understand the above,, “betting his life on 0 feedback roles”,, you saying the existence of the role is only not valid if there is no point for it?? setup spec? first counterclaim; this is grand idea lol!!
just thinking,, whether true claim or not isn’t important,, the contents of the role is easy to excuse anyway
e.g “sorry my shot missed!” or “sorry was saving my shot”
in saying so, claiming early is not a big disadvantage for scum,, therefore stance of “towniness” is void)
There may be something I'd want to say about this, but first I need you to clarify something up which I realized I may have been reading incorrectly.
In post 56, Nono wrote:
more serious note, agree fast claim is towny,,
no time to think, meaning as non-advantageous as scum
brain off type play, imo, is town
,, i know, i'm town too kek xD
By this you meant that furtive specifically fast-claiming is town, or that in general enacting a policy to fast-claim en masse is +EV for town? I rekon that you may have recanted that opinion, but I need clarity on what that opinion was
In post 213, MegAzumarill wrote:
Feels different from citadel but mainly moving because I'm liking Aero's posta so far
Don't worry, sure I will make a boneheaded play sooner or later here haha.
Confess what Nono?
'dREW DID IT BETTER' - T-Bone
'doctor drew our hero' - Shiki
'I love playing with him, he's got an amazing presence to him that just feels like the game is lacking something when he's not there' - JacksonVirgo
'dREW DID IT BETTER' - T-Bone
'doctor drew our hero' - Shiki
'I love playing with him, he's got an amazing presence to him that just feels like the game is lacking something when he's not there' - JacksonVirgo
