Something like this always pings me a bit. Because I know we're playing a game on "mafia" scum - and generally the opposing team to town is "mafia" but Mod never mentioned "mafia" in their opening posts. They referred to the opposing faction as "scum".In post 124, Clone wrote:I believe Crescent should have voted me by now, the excessive analyzation and a delay to vote comes off asMafia. Their posts tend to indicate that they know I'm not actuallyMafia(as they areMafia)
Also, it's not like they've been doing this the whole game. They are mostly referring to scum as scum. Except in this long post.In post 177, Kowahbunga wrote:Something like this always pings me a bit. Because I know we're playing a game on "mafia" scum - and generally the opposing team to town is "mafia" but Mod never mentioned "mafia" in their opening posts. They referred to the opposing faction as "scum".In post 124, Clone wrote:I believe Crescent should have voted me by now, the excessive analyzation and a delay to vote comes off asMafia. Their posts tend to indicate that they know I'm not actuallyMafia(as they areMafia)
The first person to mention "mafia" this game? Well that was me, but in reference to the name of the game.
Others have also mentioned "mafia" in reference to the game.
Clone though, they have actually used the term "mafia" like there are mafia in the game. Likelihood of that being the case? I assume pretty good. But this is something that sticks out to me.
Yes and 124 looks like multiple posts which were written independently and later edited together.In post 178, Kowahbunga wrote: Also, it's not like they've been doing this the whole game. They are mostly referring to scum as scum. Except in this long post.
This is just blantatly false. I have said that BBT could maybe be scum, but have mostly said that he is town-siding and that his vote against me was natural. I only called you scum and brought up 1 point that you could be taken advantage of BBTs vote, possibly making you a team. But then I guess you don't have to be a team to do that. I didn't see any coordination between BBT and Crescent. But did ask Crescent to give a read on BBT. BBT is the only person that has talked that Crescent did not give an analysis on. Which also leads me to believe that one of the silent players is also most likely scum.In post 163, Crescent wrote: and he immediately calls both BBT and myself scum with far more certainly I ever called him scum.
Don't really see whats the problem with one shit post. People could still get a read out of that, even if it seems like a useless postIn post 185, Kowahbunga wrote: @BBT
Not important to the game.
I'm sat here wearing a red hoodie that I bet you would just love.
Don't see it.In post 182, Frogsterking wrote: My Kowahbunga read can be condensed into a single word:
Spoiler: spoilered to avoid biasing Crescent before they post their own read
Is this VC correct?In post 175, T3 wrote:
VC 1.5
Clone (2): BlueBloodedToffee, redFF, geraintm
Cephrir (1): Kowahbunga
Elements (1): Cephrir
Kowahbunga (1): biancospino
Crescent (1): Elements
JacksonVirgo (1): Frogsterking
Not voting (5): nepenthe, JacksonVirgo, Herta, Crescent, Clone
Day 1 will end in (expired on 2023-02-26 21:03:00)
I'm guessing based on your name and location you're an Everton supporter?In post 189, BlueBloodedToffee wrote: Clone, where do you feel like Frog was setting up to vote you?
Kowah, tell me more!!
Well would probably be worth a discussion if one of those three can't have their vote counted or something.In post 191, Crescent wrote: It shows 3 people on Clone but Clone having only two votes, but I believe it is correct otherwise.
I'm pretty sure such a role would be banned in normals so Occam's razor says host error.In post 193, Kowahbunga wrote:Well would probably be worth a discussion if one of those three can't have their vote counted or something.In post 191, Crescent wrote: It shows 3 people on Clone but Clone having only two votes, but I believe it is correct otherwise.
I assume you mean post #186 and #187.#187 and #188 are about as useless as posts pretending to be content get. It basically just invents a semantical reason to throw shade on the leading vote. I see little similarity between what I've seen of him this game and the game you linked to earlier.
His questioning my experience on Mafia and trying to get an idea of my meta plays seem a bit shady. Feels like a false attempt to start an analysis. From his perspective, it seems inevitable that I will get voted. He leads into a minor accusation (as hes done already), which would then progress as I get pushed.Clone, where do you feel like Frog was setting up to vote you?
Apparently I listed the wrong numbers in my original post. That was directed at Kow's "argument" against you.In post 195, Clone wrote:I assume you mean post #186 and #187.#187 and #188 are about as useless as posts pretending to be content get. It basically just invents a semantical reason to throw shade on the leading vote. I see little similarity between what I've seen of him this game and the game you linked to earlier.
Post #186 was just calling you out on your false accusation about me instantly calling BBT scum; when I was targetting you and not them.
Post #187 does not in anyway throw shade on a vote.
His questioning my experience on Mafia and trying to get an idea of my meta plays seem a bit shady. Feels like a false attempt to start an analysis. From his perspective, it seems inevitable that I will get voted. He leads into a minor accusation (as hes done already), which would then progress as I get pushed.Clone, where do you feel like Frog was setting up to vote you?
It just pings me. Cool with your input on it and happy if it doesn't ping others. Just sticks out to me because subconscious slips are a thing. They've happened before, they'll happen again. Just because you can mention one game where it was wrong to follow this logic, doesn't mean all games and situations will always be just like that.In post 196, Crescent wrote: Oh and to further the point about #177 and #178, perspective slips don't really exist when it comes to nouns and pronouns. I once saw a town throw a game at lylo because someone accidentally referred to the scum team as "we" and was voted off strictly for that.
Couldn't care less that there's four interchangeable terms for not-town and he decided to use the one that people generally haven't been using this game so far.
It actually kind of bugs me a bit that FK didn't call this out because I believe he's a player that should know how meaningless the argument was.