And considering you were actually the mod that game, you should have seen his reasoning as wrong. So I'm not quite sure how I see this vote as well.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
In post 124, Kokichi Oma wrote:
The game you're referring to, I vote TL and pushed him all of day 1. Never tried to buddy him as well. I was the MAIN factor as to why TL was the day 1 vote.
more importantly than me being wrong about your behaviour in that game, is how can you possibly townread me for 'voting you back' and how could you phrase that as your vote being some sort of reaction test. I don't see the townhunting in this? also in ab:loaf at least I voted you first.
you did the same kind of superficial fake solving reasoning with STD. 'i thought you were scummy the other game so maybe now you're town' is another example of you having tired reads in page 2-3 or whatever. that's why HPE thinks your posts are boring.
I think these two posts are particularly scummy, just so we're clear:
You did the same thing there and you were town and I tunneled you all game. Also the other game I thought you were town you were scum now that I think about it.
In the 2 games I've played with you, every time I voted you, you voted me back. You were town those games so I wanted to see if you would do the same here. Good work
In post 131, Gimli wrote:
more importantly than me being wrong about your behaviour in that game,
So you admit your reasoning was wrong, but you think that I was trying to buddy both of you. I was going to vote StD until he reminded me I did that in Haunted, you were there that game so you should know I tunneled him all day 1 when we were both town. As for you, I don't townread you, I was just seeing if you'd do the same thing you always do.
You did this when I voted you when we were both town, so I wanted to see if you had the same reaction. Not if I was automatically going to think you were town for it.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
Actually, never mind. I remembered that game wrong. I thought you voted me for suspecting you.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
Yeah, I suspected you after for something different and then you suspected me. It was not in the same line that I thought it went.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
Either way, i think Gimli is just hyper focused on me cause I had him completely fooled last game, or that could be just a facade. Not important right now.
VOTE: Azu
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
okay so we're both using wrong meta to identify things. to me the important thing is that I don't believe you have a townhunting attitude wrt me and STD. but if I'm wrong, maybe in time I'll find you in this game. I don't expect you to townread me for voting you, and I don't expect you to townread STD for posting a jokey entrance just because he did the same thing in haunted village.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
Let's all play a game. Which person do you think is most likely NOT to be Kira as of right now and why?
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
vanderscamp is the towniest player I think. lorne trolled a bit too much to be kira. but the one player with nearly no kira equity is hopefully meg. cause of that thing meg posted. I don't really wanna talk about it too much, but I feel that meg might have openclaimed kira alignment, and it's still not a good flip because we should be focused solely on kira hunting.
In post 140, Gimli wrote:
but I feel that meg might have openclaimed kira alignment, and it's still not a good flip because we should be focused solely on kira hunting.
Why? If we get to day 3 and there are 2 followers left. They could basically pretend to be Kira and get voted out until it's day 5 and they win automatically. We should be still getting rid of his followers too early rather than late.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
I guess the not showing information changes things. But, I still feel like anyone that could potentially help Kira should be eliminated.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
My thought is that if it's day 3 and there are 6 people left. 2 followers, Kira and 3 of us. It's game over for us.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
let's say we follow a plan that kills indiscriminately between kira and followers.
say we use that plan to get 'wolfy people' and people who are openly talking to kira in thread like meg
say we kill them and the game doesn't end
the problem we have is that we don't know what we killed. we might have killed a townie instead. we need some sort of strong evidence to kill based off things that aren't specifically kira hunting, which is hunting for a mastermind serial killer, and normal scumhunting tools might as well be a bunch of ass. so we need to kill off based on a 'could this player easily be kira?' type of mindset first. if we get followers, that's good. but it should be secundary and accidental when we do it imo.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.