In post 49, Andante wrote:
also, the votes flying my way has me thinking we're a T/T pair cause if yall think about it, scum know their lover, and they know their partner's lover. scum will want to vote in any of the 4 that aren't a scum pairing to get 2 town out... just saying
You have two votes.
Do you really think that's enough to be relevant at this stage of the game?
Didn't really register with me that this is a mini game so that would put Vander at L-3 already.
Gonna:
VOTE: Andante
I'm torn on the idea of openly discussing theory like that. On the one hand the Mafia inherently has an information edge in general, but in this game there may be some edge the mafia can gain if everything's out in the open.
This kind of post seems indicative to me that Bub is trying to put on the appearance of looking pro-town rather than actually being pro-town.
L-3 is like nothing. Like how can you even apply pressure if you're too scared to put on a second vote. I feel like Bub worrying about putting a player at L-3 by adding *just* a second vote shows he's worried about optics here.
And I think schadd_ once said "first unvote is always a wolf."
From this it looks like Vander is your lover, you may want to correct me if that's not the case. Otherwise voting/unvoting your lover, with no valid reasons attached to the unvote, looks very bad. It looks like you want to put on a show that you are considering wagoning your lover, which would be -EV for scum to do, while arbitrarily not actually doing it
In post 49, Andante wrote:
also, the votes flying my way has me thinking we're a T/T pair cause if yall think about it, scum know their lover, and they know their partner's lover. scum will want to vote in any of the 4 that aren't a scum pairing to get 2 town out... just saying
You have two votes.
Do you really think that's enough to be relevant at this stage of the game?
Quoting this just because it would be hilarious if both votes are from scum
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
Didn't really register with me that this is a mini game so that would put Vander at L-3 already.
Gonna:
VOTE: Andante
I'm torn on the idea of openly discussing theory like that. On the one hand the Mafia inherently has an information edge in general, but in this game there may be some edge the mafia can gain if everything's out in the open.
This kind of post seems indicative to me that Bub is trying to put on the appearance of looking pro-town rather than actually being pro-town.
L-3 is like nothing. Like how can you even apply pressure if you're too scared to put on a second vote. I feel like Bub worrying about putting a player at L-3 by adding *just* a second vote shows he's worried about optics here.
And I think schadd_ once said "first unvote is always a wolf."
VOTE: Bub Bidderskins
Still early so all these reads are flimsy, but this is a decent town tell for Chad in my book for trying to move out of RVS into actual discussion.
biancospino jumping onto the wagon at the easiest point, but it's productive to get a wagon going this early and I don't think the scum are naive enough to think this wagon is close to escape velocity this early on.
That's a really weak reason to townread someone. We were hardly in RVS to begin with.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
I mean sure, but even by those standards this is weak. It doesn't make sense since we were already having real discussion as of like #24. You yourself were already making a somewhat serious vote in #39.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
I'm more interested in reading you specifically since you're the wagon of the hour, so specifically I'm trying to figure out how legitimate your townread is.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
I said "specifically" twice which is kind of awkward, oh well
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
From this it looks like Vander is your lover, you may want to correct me if that's not the case. Otherwise voting/unvoting your lover, with no valid reasons attached to the unvote, looks very bad. It looks like you want to put on a show that you are considering wagoning your lover, which would be -EV for scum to do, while arbitrarily not actually doing it
In post 57, Bub Bidderskins wrote:
biancospino jumping onto the wagon at the easiest point, but it's productive to get a wagon going this early and I don't think the scum are naive enough to think this wagon is close to escape velocity this early on.
What's your opinion on Andante analyzing her votes?
