freelo?In post 460, yessiree wrote: why wouldn't scum do something to be in the best position possible? especially when it was freelo
what kinda question is this?
I'm writing a novel about a boy stranded in the wilderness after an airplane crash?In post 461, Flavor Leaf wrote: Lol, Aureal is Hatcheting me hardcore
I don't see what you're seeing but if I am, great? Townreads should be protected, shouldn't they?In post 462, Flavor Leaf wrote: The way Aureal is playing is protecting Python. They're chop chop chopping at me.
In post 463, usesPython wrote: Those aren't mutually exclusive thing you know, having meta on someone means they're probably not gonna be a null for you. For players with less scum experience no meta is better since they're still at the skill level where they need to focus on not getting caught. For players with more scum experience meta is better since it lets them leverage those relationships to control the game
-A
???In post 471, Save The Dragons wrote: but if you really want a reason, go back and look at what aureal has done to try and sort me
Ask?In post 474, Merlyn wrote: Are we not the only people in big hood to ask to sort big hood?
In post 475, usesPython wrote:If we can get a consensus read on anyone in the small hood (whether a TR or an SR) then I'd prefer to lim in the big hood todayIn post 473, usesPython wrote: Mechanically speaking we should only be limming big hood day 1 if we've got someone in the small hood locktown/lockscum, otherwise we risk losing a mislim compared to just limming in small hood until we hit scum to guarantee at least getting to 3p ELO
-A
-A
I don't feel the same. I have three scumreads and one townread in big hood.In post 488, SirCakez wrote: I kinda want to lim in the big hood today actually
I feel we have a good shot there compared to little hood
Sorry, I was having a rough day and it felt like basically everything was trying to shit on me. Thanks for the explanation.
BTW, can you explain this further? Where have you gotten much in the way of being scumread for playstyle?In post 384, usesPython wrote:Fine I'll respond to this shitpush, we get scumread all the time for our playstyle and I see the same thing happening here
-A
Uh, I literally just responded to your posts which had nothing in the way of answers to me. You claimed I was (I guess) trying to attack you to somehow defend Python?? But you didn't respond to anything I said. You already had the chance to answer, the posts are still there to answer, why are you trying to push it back at me to say things again?In post 509, Flavor Leaf wrote: @Aureal - what are the reasons you have “issues” with my play?
Give me a bullet point list.
I feel like my posts would have answered them, but give me the low down
Again, you're just attempting to discredit rather than interact.In post 510, Flavor Leaf wrote: Also, the OMGUS is hilarious.
Is this all it is?In post 457, Aureal wrote:In post 405, Flavor Leaf wrote: I forgot STD in the big hood thing, but they’re in a similar situation as AD for me, while they could be scum, but I have some reasonings to believe they’re town, so it made sense to pressure Aureal slot to see and feel if I was off on my reads or not.
You forgot, huh. What exactly are these "some reasonings to believe they're town" then?
I'm attacking you without posting about you now? You were just so certain I was attacking you with my posts and now you can't find them? lolwutIn post 517, Flavor Leaf wrote: What posts were directed towards me that you stated?
In post 446, Aureal wrote:Momentum shifting? I have a hard time feeling like anything that early can really have momentum.In post 253, Flavor Leaf wrote: Merlyn vote on Yessiree is a momentum shifting vote. Wanting to note it because it clashes with where I was here, but it was their entrance really, so not overly scummy, but worth noting.
Ah yes, this is where my brain broke earlier. The idea of Python "subtly" controlling the game. I don't think Python really doesBoth Invisibility and Python are subtly controlling this game. On the surface, it looks like Invisibility, but I can see it being Python just letting it flow, but their change onto Yess was an action that I didn't like at all. If the sole purpose for not scum reading Yess was because they put them into the neighborhood, yet they acted like the neighborhood was 'random choosing', that's just a poor reason because it's not 'random' It's the order of the sign-ups, which has a reason. And even if so, scum actively had to choose to do so still, and didn't have to commit to it.subtle.
Thinking something is currently cool is definitely something people can do. I recently considered replacing into a game in elo and read a little bit of it, came up with two theories on who the scum team was, and eventually didn't pull the trigger on joining the game partly because I was worried it was a doomed scum slot and I didn't want to mess up my incredible Mafia win rate on a game I barely even was in.Python's Zero% Lim is rough because they brought it up themselves, like that's a built in defense for why they wouldnt put themselves in small hood, which is why theyd put themselves in small hood. But it's not the best defense either way, and don't think it helps, just kind of rough they said it. Like a little extra sprinkle for presentation. Do they even care about it in the long run or is it just something they think is currently cool? Idk.
What is this garbage take, lol. I think it's incredibly obvious that Dragons got some pushback because he said "let's pay attention to big hood, uh no I don't have any attention of my own to give big hood but I'll tell other people to do it" which is pretty silly.Absolutely think the STD hops are gross. People targeted him because he thought we should target in big hood, which is like, eh, don't necessarily agree, but I think it's fair for people to be sick of small hood stuff and find a reason to move away from it.
Nope, still makes negative sense. I had already pivoted to big hood with a Cakez vote even before poking at Dragons. Why are you trying to paint the exact opposite picture of what actually was happening?GOing after STD the way people did for that is just reinforcing any thought outside of small hood is negative.
In post 447, Aureal wrote:Negative sense continues to be made by Flavor Leaf. Are you partners with Invis?In post 255, Flavor Leaf wrote:I like this reasoning for why you don't like the read.In post 252, Invisibility wrote: it's so weak cuz the read is based off the idea that Cakez would be difficult to fake a mindmeld with AD, which is true, but since AD didn't share these ideas beforehand that the only way Cakez would be able to fake this would be if he could read minds. Maybe terrible is too strong a word, but it's very very weird to me that he would even mention the unlikelihood of Cakez faking mindmeldable stuff as a townread reason cuz it's so beyond the realm of possibility that it's not even worth mentioning. Is the read otherwise much different than a regular mindmeld read? Not really! But the weird logic used makes me suspicious.
In post 449, Aureal wrote:The mind boggles. Dan's on the top of my big hood pile.In post 284, Flavor Leaf wrote: ActionDan is a hard one to truly town read here, but I get why he was town reading Cakez.
But Aureal was skirting around. I need to look back at them more.
@Python - you talked about Aureal a little bit before, do you scum read them?
What the hell game are you reading? "Skirting around"? What does that even mean? It sounds like you're trying to say I'm not doing anything, but I think I've been one of if not the most active big hood player. Even having dropped off somewhat for a few days because I've been hella busy and couldn't focus on this.
Okay, so you just wanna argue instead of showing them to me?In post 521, Aureal wrote:I'm attacking you without posting about you now? You were just so certain I was attacking you with my posts and now you can't find them? lolwutIn post 517, Flavor Leaf wrote: What posts were directed towards me that you stated?
