In post 553, Menalque wrote:
man it's so hard to get into games when nobody is ever live with me
I'm curious where this came from. The game has been going for 6 days and you have been V/LA for like half of this time.
(If you're town I'm sure your feelings are valid!! But it's like :hmm: how did you come to the conclusion that nobody is ever online at your same time)
No I haven't looked back at Andante yet yes that's next on my list
note: not "into this game" but "into games". it's just that I have fairly limited time for MS (I like to play but it's p close to last on list of priorities) and feel I'm much more productive both at producing and at deducing when I'm interacting either live or close to it. I used to have a v bad habit of sitting around for ages refreshing (or playing 4-5 games at a time so at least one would have content) -- anyway if I log in and post and don't see a reply within like 5 mins then I'm likely to go do something else even if I'm free to be around and play, and that makes it hard to get into games. I think nobody was around right after my brief catch up posts for instance, even though I could have played longer potentially at that point
In post 574, implosion wrote:
Enchant has now been here 24 hours without giving a single statement of any import whatsoever.
This isn't what Enchant town rep-in looks like. Here is the canonical Enchant town rep-in. He immediately starts talking about the game, giving thoughts on game-relevant stuff, is easy to read almost immediately off this.
Compare this scum rep-in; he posts game-relevant stuff a bit under a day later rather than immediately.
Compare this scum game (not a replace-in) where I had Enchant dead to rights d1:
I, from that game, wrote:Enchant's 2 posts so far ring much truer to what I know of his scum game than his town game; at least, to my memory, I've seen him actually play the game as town and decidedly not play the game as scum (though I'm probably going to over-weight that scum game in my mind because I knew he was scum all game).
Wagon Enchant *at least* until they do something. Anything. Please.
you have experience with enchant right? I think wagoning enchant is similar to wagoning N_M -- often a good idea, but unlikely to lead to anything very telling from him
like: if enchant is scum, cool, partners might bus or might just stall out plus I'm not likely to get anything from him. if enchant is town, cool, scum might back the wagon or they might let it stall out because they want to keep him around as a later game lim instead of burning the lim D1
this is not me shitting on enchant but again, similar to N_M, he's limbait and regardless of alignment I don't think the wagons on him are likely to be that productive or to spur other people into having interesting reactions or to do things that are revealing of alignment whereas a wagon elsewhere is more likely to lead to those things imo
Ok but drew was kinda scummy and enchant is actually capable of providing content. He's just lolcatting now
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
can you tell me why you decided to claim PR when you had 4 votes on you?
In post 452, Andante wrote:
and whoever is my counterwagon is probably a powerful scum, Idk what wagon is
The largest wagon at the time was Drew and there was a VC on the previous page. You even posted on that same page. I'm not saying it's impossible for someone to be posting yet unaware of certain things in a game, but, idk, can you say a few words about this
In post 113, sheepsaysmeep wrote:
it's a light thing cuz I like to force out nonzero reads rn lol
like I wouldnt even try to convince other people of it or anything
"writing off as town" is a bit strong
well you're obviously saying that right now, you think I'm more likely to be town than scum, and you're just going "cause meta"
so I asked for the clarification, like what specific posts, what exactly it was I did, and you're just like "I didn't write you off as town" ok, I know we all have different definitions of tr/whatnot, but you are saying I'm out of null, and leaning town... and now you can't point it out?
I am the worst player to only read off meta. so I want to know what meta you're confident in here to not SR me, but instead have me leaning towards being town
In post 118, Andante wrote:
sorry I'm just like, people saying I'm town and meta in the same sentence? I'm calling it out cause you can literally find any kind of game from me to prove whatever "meta" you're trying to prove.. plus I'm like obviously town here so... no free passes to tr me!
This said, I looked at Andante's ISO, and what a baffling hill to die on as scum.
-sighs softly-
