In post 1372, Aureal wrote:
Cool, I love being performative.
In post 1368, usesPython wrote:
In post 1366, Aureal wrote:
In post 1304, Radical Rat wrote:
We really should be voting for at least seven people, as that's the requirement for Normal Invention, which most everyone agrees is the best option
Oh, actually. We need to vote for at least four (because five is the minimum and Drew is already in) but I don't see why we can't do another proposal afterwards to add more people to get to seven. Since we seem to be struggling to get a consensus after the first few consensus townreads, it might be easier to work with that way- get more consensus people confirmed then scrap over the last couple.
I would rather have a 7-8 person proposal get passed through plurality rules just in case scum have a hammerer. Can we just pretend we passed a 5 person proposal without actually doing it?
Hmmm, not a bad point. Having pretend proposals sounds like all sorts of fun chaos. XD
How about if everyone makes a list sorting who they do/don't/maybe support to help figure out who's consensus/viable?
Yes: Radical Rat, Save the Dragons, usesPython, Abnegation, Titus, Kyoko Kirigiri, Aureal
Maybe: Dragoneater70, Morning Tweet, sheepsaysmeep, Random Nurse, KatyKimFanclub, Flea the Magician, camelCasedSnivy
No: Ranger, Rautherdir, WhemeStar, Merlyn
Just saw this, first of all Aureal's posts on that page are soooo townie. Second, here's my list (that's sorta merged with a readlist) if anyone cares:
Definitely yes: usesPython, Radical Rat, Ranger, DragonEater70, Aureal, Abnegation
Possibly: KKFC, sheep, Titus?
Meh: StD (I never have reads on StD D1), Flea, Wheme (feels like limbait more than scum)
I still don't have a read on them: Snivy, MT, Titus? (I vaguely remember having a slight townread on her but I don't even remember why so I'll have to reread)
No: Rauth (I see this lost momentum as a wagon so will look into it later), Merlyn, Nurse, Kyoko (explained above)