ok hm.... i guess thats like a fairly narrow and unconvincing pool of fun car folks to think that scum exists fully within. and well i also had the thought earlier that, based on how any day 1s in other games anecdotally play out and how town is generally (in my experience) pretty bad at finding correct full solutions this early on in the game, any winning coalition probably has to take some successful gambles on limbait -- except i dont really know if there have come to be any of those in this game, it seems like everyone's got advocates to some degreeIn post 1699, Aristeia wrote: hellbooks how do you feel about the coalition <tris, sheep, thestatusquo, skitter, fireisredsir> rn
i guess when it comes to the general philosophy of "maximizing odds", the proposed coal seems to somewhat accurately reflect the group of people with the most consensus. i think my one big problem with that is with a "coalition of least resistance" such as this, if there arent voices significantly shouting against it, then the very simple conclusion to draw is that scum is fine with it. but of coruse maybe it IS a winning game of coal and scum is playing a game of chicken, like we haven't adequately threatened to make it a reality so they're holding firm and silent (and maybe in order to advance that threat i should instead be going like "yeah full steam ahead lets blast this coal into reality" and i honestly am at a baseline of 20 per cent wanting to say that about literally any proposed coal at this point). or maybe they're kind of trying to softly sow dissent against the coal like um. you are doing now maybe. except i kind of do want you in the coal so. at least more than like 3 or 4 of those people. i guess youre the person that id like to gamble on. lets bet on this. let bet on this shit. reference to my former avatar that was adam sandler of uncut gems and i might change it back in the spirit of things